TypeSystemClang::CreateTypedef was creating a typedef in the right
DeclContext, but it was not actually adding it as a child of the
context. The resulting inconsistent state meant that we would be unable
to reference the typedef from an expression directly, but we could use
them if they end up being pulled in by some previous subexpression
(because the ASTImporter will set up the correct links in the expression
ast).
This patch adds the typedef to the decl context it is created in.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86140
Rename the existing expectedFailure to expectedFailureIfFn to better
describe its purpose and provide an overload for
unittest2.expectedFailure in decorators.py.
Like the other type sugar removed by RemoveWrappingTypes, SubstTemplateTypeParm
is just pure sugar that should be ignored. If we don't ignore it (as we do now),
LLDB will fail to read values from record fields that have a
SubstTemplateTypeParm type.
Only way to produce such a type in LLDB is to either use the `import-std-module`
setting to get a template into the expression parser or just create your own
template directly in the expression parser which is what we do in the test.
Reviewed By: jarin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85132
Template specializations are not handled in many of the
TypeSystemClang methods. For example, GetNumChildren does not handle
the TemplateSpecialization type class, so template specializations
always look like empty objects.
This patch just desugars template specializations in the existing
RemoveWrappingTypes desugaring helper.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83858
Summary:
Currently expect_expr will not run the expression if no target is selected. This
patch changes this behavior so that expect_expr will instead fall back to the
dummy target similar to what the `expression` command is doing. This way we
don't have to compile an empty executable to be able to use `expect_expr` (which
is a waste of resources for tests that just test generic type system features).
As a test I modernized the TestTypeOfDeclTypeExpr into a Python test +
expect_expr (as it relied on the dummy target fallback of the expression
command).
Reviewers: labath, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: abidh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83388
Currently the ItaniumRecordLayoutBuilder when laying out base classes has the virtual
and non-virtual bases mixed up when pulling the base class layouts from the external source.
This came up in an LLDB bug where on arm64 because of differences in how it deals with
tail padding would layout the bases differently without the correct layout from the
external source (LLDB). This would result in some fields being off by 4 bytes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83008
After this patch all remaining tests should pass on macOS when replayed
from a reproducer.
To capture the reproducers:
./bin/llvm-lit ../llvm-project/lldb/test/ --param lldb-run-with-repro=capture
To replay the reproducers:
./bin/llvm-lit ../llvm-project/lldb/test/ --param lldb-run-with-repro=replay
Many tests use (commented out) print statement for debugging the test
itself. This patch adds a new trace method to lldbtest to reuse the
existing tracing infrastructure and replace these print statements.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80448
This reverts commit 5f88f39ab8. It broke these
three tests on the Window bot:
lldb-api :: commands/expression/completion/TestExprCompletion.py
lldb-api :: lang/cpp/scope/TestCppScope.py
lldb-api :: lang/cpp/standards/cpp11/TestCPP11Standard.py
Summary:
Currently we never enable C++14 in the expression evaluator. This enables it when the language of the program is C++14.
It seems C++17 and so on isn't yet in any of the language enums (and the DWARF standard it seems), so C++17 support will be a follow up patch.
Reviewers: labath, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: labath, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80308
The overloaded new operator in TestCppOperators.py are working by accident because of how
we currently deal with artificial methods.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79251
Summary:
Sometimes a result variable of some expression can be presented as an elaborated
type. In this case the methods `IsTypedefType()` and `GetTypedefedType()` of
`SBType` didn't work. This patch fixes that.
I didn't find the test for these API methods, so I added a basic test for this
too.
Reviewers: aprantl, teemperor, labath, leonid.mashinskiy
Reviewed By: teemperor
Subscribers: labath, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78697
This is a regression since:
[lldb][NFC] Modernize lang/cpp/scope test
acb0b99c8e
rGacb0b99c8e4f
File "/home/jkratoch/redhat/llvm-monorepo/lldb/test/API/lang/cpp/scope/TestCppScope.py", line 19, in test
self.assertEqual(global_var_names, expected_var_names)
AssertionError: Lists differ: ['C::a', 'A::a', 'B::a', '::a'... != ['A::a', 'B::a', 'C::a', '::a'...
First differing element 0:
C::a
A::a
- ['C::a', 'A::a', 'B::a', '::a']
+ ['A::a', 'B::a', 'C::a', '::a']
ManualDWARFIndex using NameToDIE does not sort alphabetically:
// This is only for uniqueness, not lexicographical ordering, so we can
// just compare pointers.
return uintptr_t(lhs.GetCString()) < uintptr_t(rhs.GetCString());
Summary:
D73024 seems to have fixed one set crash, but it introduced another.
Namely, if a class contains a covariant method returning itself, the
logic in MaybeCompleteReturnType could cause us to attempt a recursive
import, which would result in an assertion failure in
clang::DeclContext::removeDecl.
For some reason, this only manifested itself if the class contained at
least two member variables, and the class itself was imported as a
result of a recursive covariant import.
This patch fixes the crash by not attempting to import classes which are
already completed in MaybeCompleteReturnType. However, it's not clear to
me if this is the right fix, or if this should be handled automatically
by functions lower in the stack.
Reviewers: teemperor, shafik
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76840
When parsing DWARF and laying out bit-fields we currently don't take into account whether we have a base class or not.
Currently if the first field is a bit-field but the bit offset is due a field we inherit from a base class we currently
treat it as an unnamed bit-field and therefore add an extra field.
This fix will not check if we have a base class and assume that this offset is due to members we are inheriting from the base.
We are currently seeing asserts during codegen when debugging clang::DiagnosticOptions.
This assumption will fail in the case where the first field in the derived class in an unnamed bit-field. Fixing the first field
being an unnamed bit-field looks like it will require a larger change since we will need a way to track or discover the last field offset of the bases(s).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76808
It was an inline test before. Clang stopped emitting line information
for the TLS initialization and the inline test didn't have a way to
break before it anymore.
This rewrites the test as a full-fldeged python test and improves the
checking of the error case to verify that the failure we are looking
for is related to the TLS setup not being complete.
Fix to get the AST we generate for function templates closer to what clang generates and expects.
We fix which FuntionDecl we are passing to CreateFunctionTemplateSpecializationInfo and we strip
template parameters from the name when creating the FunctionDecl and FunctionTemplateDecl.
These two fixes together fix asserts and ambiguous lookup issues for several cases which are added to the already existing small function template test.
This fixes issues with overloads, overloads and ADL, variadic function templates and templated operator overloads.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75761