Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).
This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).
Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
Summary:
Lldb's "format-independent" debug info made use of the fact that DWARF
(<=4) did not use the file index zero, and reused the support file index
zero for storing the compile unit name.
While this provided some convenience for DWARF<=4, it meant that the PDB
plugin needed to artificially remap file indices in order to free up
index 0. Furthermore, DWARF v5 make file index 0 legal, which meant that
similar remapping would be needed in the dwarf plugin too.
What this patch does instead is remove the requirement of having the
compile unit name in the index 0. It is not that useful since the name
can always be fetched from the CompileUnit object. Remapping code in the
pdb plugin(s) has been removed or simplified.
DWARF plugin has started inserting an empty FileSpec at index 0 to
ensure the indices keep matching up (in case of DWARF<=4). For DWARF5,
we insert the file 0 from the line table.
I add a test to ensure we can correctly lookup line table entries
referencing file 0, and in particular the case where the file 0 is also
duplicated in another file entry, as this is how clang produces line
tables in some circumstances (see pr44170). Though this is probably a
bug in clang, this is not forbidden by DWARF, and lldb already has
support for that in some (but not all) cases -- this adds a test for the
code path which was not fixed in this patch.
Reviewers: clayborg, JDevlieghere, jdoerfert
Subscribers: aprantl, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70954
Summary:
The FileSpec class is often used as a sort of a pattern -- one specifies
a bare file name to search, and we check if in matches the full file
name of an existing module (for example).
These comparisons used FileSpec::Equal, which had some support for it
(via the full=false argument), but it was not a good fit for this job.
For one, it did a symmetric comparison, which makes sense for a function
called "equal", but not for typical searches (when searching for
"/foo/bar.so", we don't want to find a module whose name is just
"bar.so"). This resulted in patterns like:
if (FileSpec::Equal(pattern, file, pattern.GetDirectory()))
which would request a "full" match only if the pattern really contained
a directory. This worked, but the intended behavior was very unobvious.
On top of that, a lot of the code wanted to handle the case of an
"empty" pattern, and treat it as matching everything. This resulted in
conditions like:
if (pattern && !FileSpec::Equal(pattern, file, pattern.GetDirectory())
which are nearly impossible to decipher.
This patch introduces a FileSpec::Match function, which does exactly
what most of FileSpec::Equal callers want, an asymmetric match between a
"pattern" FileSpec and a an actual FileSpec. Empty paterns match
everything, filename-only patterns match only the filename component.
I've tried to update all callers of FileSpec::Equal to use a simpler
interface. Those that hardcoded full=true have been changed to use
operator==. Those passing full=pattern.GetDirectory() have been changed
to use FileSpec::Match.
There was also a handful of places which hardcoded full=false. I've
changed these to use FileSpec::Match too. This is a slight change in
semantics, but it does not look like that was ever intended, and it was
more likely a result of a misunderstanding of the "proper" way to use
FileSpec::Equal.
[In an ideal world a "FileSpec" and a "FileSpec pattern" would be two
different types, but given how widespread FileSpec is, it is unlikely
we'll get there in one go. This at least provides a good starting point
by centralizing all matching behavior.]
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere, jdoerfert
Subscribers: emaste, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70851
Summary:
CompileUnit is a complicated class. Having it be implicitly convertible
to a FileSpec makes reasoning about it even harder.
This patch replaces the inheritance by a simple member and an accessor
function. This avoid the need for casting in places where one needed to
force a CompileUnit to be treated as a FileSpec, and does not add much
verbosity elsewhere.
It also fixes a bug where we were wrongly comparing CompileUnit& and a
CompileUnit*, which compiled due to a combination of this inheritance
and the FileSpec*->FileSpec implicit constructor.
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere, jdoerfert
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70827
Summary:
I found the above named method hard to read because it had
a) many nested blocks,
b) one return statement at the end with some logic involved,
c) a duplicated while-loop with just small differences in it.
I decided to refactor this function by employing an early exit strategy.
In order to capture the logic in the return statement and to not have it
repeated more than once I chose to implement a very small lamda function
that captures all the variables it needs.
I also replaced the two while-loops with just one.
This is a non-functional change (NFC).
Reviewers: jdoerfert, teemperor
Reviewed By: teemperor
Subscribers: labath, teemperor, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70774
Summary:
I found the above named method hard to read because it had
a) many nested blocks and
b) one return statement at the end with some logic involved.
I decided to refactor this function by employing an early exit strategy.
In order to capture the logic in the return statement and to not have it
repeated more than once I chose to implement a very small lamda function
that captures all the variables it needs.
This is a non-functional change (NFC).
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70774
I wanted to further simplify ParseTypeFromClangModule by replacing the
hand-rolled loop with ForEachExternalModule, and then realized that
ForEachExternalModule also had the problem of visiting the same leaf
node an exponential number of times in the worst-case. This adds a set
of searched_symbol_files set to the function as well as the ability to
early-exit from it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70215
Performance issues lead to the libc++ std::function formatter to be disabled. We addressed some of those performance issues by adding caching see D67111
This PR fixes the first lookup performance by not using FindSymbolsMatchingRegExAndType(...) and instead finding the compilation unit the std::function wrapped callable should be in and then searching for the callable directly in the CU.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69913
Summary:
At the moment, when trying to import the `std` module in LLDB, we look at the imported modules used in the compiled program
and try to infer the Clang configuration we need from the DWARF module-import. That was the initial idea but turned out to
cause a few problems or inconveniences:
* It requires that users compile their programs with C++ modules. Given how experimental C++ modules are makes this feature inaccessible
for many users. Also it means that people can't just get the benefits of this feature for free when we activate it by default
(and we can't just close all the associated bug reports).
* Relying on DWARF's imported module tags (that are only emitted by default on macOS) means this can only be used when using DWARF (and with -glldb on Linux).
* We essentially hardcoded the C standard library paths on some platforms (Linux) or just couldn't support this feature on other platforms (macOS).
This patch drops the whole idea of looking at the imported module DWARF tags and instead just uses the support files of the compilation unit.
If we look at the support files and see file paths that indicate where the C standard library and libc++ are, we can just create the module
configuration this information. This fixes all the problems above which means we can enable all the tests now on Linux, macOS and with other debug information
than what we currently had. The only debug information specific code is now the iteration over external type module when -gmodules is used (as `std` and also the
`Darwin` module are their own external type module with their own files).
The meat of this patch is the CppModuleConfiguration which looks at the file paths from the compilation unit and then figures out the include paths
based on those paths. It's quite conservative in that it only enables modules if we find a single C library and single libc++ library. It's still missing some
test mode where we try to compile an expression before we actually activate the config for the user (which probably also needs some caching mechanism),
but for now it works and makes the feature usable.
Reviewers: aprantl, shafik, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: mgorny, abidh, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #c_modules_in_lldb, #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67760
llvm-svn: 372716
The line number table header was substantially revised in DWARF 5 and is
not fully supported by LLDB's current debug line implementation.
This patch replaces the LLDB debug line parser with its counterpart in
LLVM. This was possible because of the limited contact surface between
the code to parse the DWARF debug line section and the rest of LLDB.
We pay a small cost in terms of performance and memory usage. This is
something we plan to address in the near future.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62570
llvm-svn: 368742
After the recent refactorings the SymbolVendor passthrough no longer
serve any purpose. This patch removes those methods, and updates all
callsites to go to the symbol file directly -- in most cases that just
means calling GetSymbolFile()->foo() instead of
GetSymbolVendor()->foo().
llvm-svn: 368001
There's no reason for anyone to modify a list from outside of a symbol
file (as that would break a lot of invariants that symbol files depend
on).
Make the function return a const FileSpecList and fix up a couple of
places that were needlessly binding non-const references to the result
of this function.
llvm-svn: 362069
A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.
Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the
lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are
omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit,
where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much.
Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks
particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the
impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.
I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between
comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a
great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for
the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the
inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508
llvm-svn: 358135
This patch properly extracts the full submodule path as well as its
search paths from DWARF import decls and passes it on to the
ClangModulesDeclVendor.
rdar://problem/47970144
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58090
llvm-svn: 353961
The `ap` suffix is a remnant of lldb's former use of auto pointers,
before they got deprecated. Although all their uses were replaced by
unique pointers, some variables still carried the suffix.
In r353795 I removed another auto_ptr remnant, namely redundant calls to
::get for unique_pointers. Jim justly noted that this is a good
opportunity to clean up the variable names as well.
I went over all the changes to ensure my find-and-replace didn't have
any undesired side-effects. I hope I didn't miss any, but if you end up
at this commit doing a git blame on a weirdly named variable, please
know that the change was unintentional.
llvm-svn: 353912
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Previously all of these functions accepted a SymbolContext&.
While a CompileUnit is one member of a SymbolContext, there
are also many others, and by passing such a monolithic parameter
in this way it makes the requirements and assumptions of the
API unclear for both callers as well as implementors.
All these methods need is a CompileUnit. By limiting the
parameter type in this way, we simplify the code as well as
make it self-documenting for both implementers and users.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56564
llvm-svn: 350943
LLVM added wrappers to std::sort (r327219) that randomly shuffle the
container before sorting. The goal is to uncover non-determinism due to
undefined sorting order of objects having the same key.
This can be enabled with -DLLVM_ENABLE_EXPENSIVE_CHECKS=ON.
llvm-svn: 350679
This patch simplifies boolean expressions acorss LLDB. It was generated
using clang-tidy with the following command:
run-clang-tidy.py -checks='-*,readability-simplify-boolean-expr' -format -fix $PWD
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55584
llvm-svn: 349215
This patch removes the logic for resolving paths out of FileSpec and
updates call sites to rely on the FileSystem class instead.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53915
llvm-svn: 345890
When we get the `resolve_scope` parameter from the SB API, it's a
`uint32_t`. We then pass it through all of LLDB this way, as a uint32.
This is unfortunate, because it means the user of an API never actually
knows what they're dealing with. We can call it something like
`resolve_scope` and have comments saying "this is a value from the
`SymbolContextItem` enumeration, but it makes more sense to just have it
actually *be* the correct type in the actual C++ type system to begin
with. This way the person reading the code just knows what it is.
The reason to use integers instead of enumerations for flags is because
when you do bitwise operations on enumerations they get promoted to
integers, so it makes it tedious to constantly be casting them back
to the enumeration types, so I've introduced a macro to make this
happen magically. By writing LLDB_MARK_AS_BITMASK_ENUM after defining
an enumeration, it will define overloaded operators so that the
returned type will be the original enum. This should address all
the mechanical issues surrounding using rich enum types directly.
This way, we get a better debugger experience, and new users to
the codebase can get more easily acquainted with the codebase because
their IDE features can help them understand what the types mean.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53597
llvm-svn: 345313
Summary:
Instead of iterating over our vector of functions, we might as well use a map here to
directly get the function we need.
Thanks to Vedant for pointing this out.
Reviewers: vsk
Reviewed By: vsk
Subscribers: mgrang, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50225
llvm-svn: 339504