Commit Graph

45 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Raphael Isemann 203a8adb65 [lldb] Add option to retry Fix-Its multiple times to failed expressions
Summary:
Usually when Clang emits an error Fix-It it does two things. It emits the diagnostic and then it fixes the
currently generated AST to reflect the applied Fix-It. While emitting the diagnostic is easy to implement,
fixing the currently generated AST is often tricky. That causes that some Fix-Its just keep the AST as-is or
abort the parsing process entirely. Once the parser stopped, any Fix-Its for the rest of the expression are
not detected and when the user manually applies the Fix-It, the next expression will just produce a new
Fix-It.

This is often occurring with quickly made Fix-Its that are just used to bridge temporary API changes
and that often are not worth implementing a proper API fixup in addition to the diagnostic. To still
give some kind of reasonable user-experience for users that have these Fix-Its and rely on them to
fix their expressions, this patch adds the ability to retry parsing with applied Fix-Its multiple time to
give the normal Fix-It experience where things Clang knows how to fix are not causing actual expression
error (at least when automatically applying Fix-Its is activated).

The way this is implemented is just by having another setting in the expression options that specify how
often we should try applying Fix-Its and then reparse the expression. The default setting is still 1 for everyone
so this should not affect the speed in which we fail to parse expressions.

Reviewers: jingham, JDevlieghere, friss, shafik

Reviewed By: shafik

Subscribers: shafik, abidh

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77214
2020-04-06 11:25:36 +02:00
Raphael Isemann 50f1985353 [lldb][NFC] Delete the original UserExpression before trying to reparse it with FixIts.
Currently when an expression fails to parse and we have a FixIt, we keep
the failed UserExpression around while trying to parse the expression with
applied fixits. This means that we have this rather confusing control flow:

1. Original expression created and parsing attempted.
2. Expression with applied FixIts is created and parsing attempted.
3. Original expression is destroyed and parser deconstructed.
4. Expression with applied FixIts is destroyed and parser deconstructed.

This patch just deletes the original expression so that step 2 and 3 are
swapped and the whole process looks more like just sequentially parsing two
expressions (which is what we actually do here).

Doesn't fix anything just makes the code less fragile.
2020-03-19 18:10:57 +01:00
Raphael Isemann 0ab109d43d [lldb][NFC] Modernize logging UserExpression 2020-03-04 09:04:54 -08:00
Raphael Isemann 642bc15dd7 [lldb][NFC] Remove several inefficient ConstString -> const char * -> StringRef conversions
StringRef will call strlen on the C string which is inefficient (as ConstString already
knows the string lenght and so does StringRef). This patch replaces all those calls
with GetStringRef() which doesn't recompute the length.
2020-02-11 09:14:41 +01:00
Alex Langford 381e81a048 [lldb][NFCI] Remove UserExpression::GetJITModule
UserExpression::GetJITModule was used to support an option in
UserExpression::Evaluate that let you hold onto the JIT Module used during
the expression evaluation. This was only actually used in one spot --
REPL::IOHandlerInputComplete. That method didn't actually take use the
JIT module it got back, so this feature was not used in practice.
This means that we can delete the support in UserExpression::Evaluate
and delete the UserExpression::GetJITModule method entirely.
2020-01-30 23:20:19 -08:00
Benjamin Kramer adcd026838 Make llvm::StringRef to std::string conversions explicit.
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.

This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.

This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
2020-01-28 23:25:25 +01:00
Raphael Isemann 808142876c [lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers
Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).

This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).

Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
2020-01-24 08:52:55 +01:00
Adrian Prantl e9331a56fe Add missing nullptr checks.
GetPersistentExpressionStateForLanguage() can return a nullptr if it
cannot construct a typesystem. This patch adds missing nullptr checks
at all uses.

Inspired by rdar://problem/58317195

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72413
2020-01-10 08:52:46 -08:00
Davide Italiano 6c87623615 [UserExpression] Clean up return after else. 2020-01-03 16:52:10 -08:00
Raphael Isemann 52f3a2faf9 [lldb][NFC] Move LLVM RTTI implementation from enum to static ID variable
Summary:
swift-lldb currently has to patch the ExpressionKind enum to add support for Swift expressions. If we implement LLVM's RTTI
with a static ID variable instead of a centralised enum we can drop that patch.

Reviewers: labath, davide

Reviewed By: labath

Subscribers: JDevlieghere, lldb-commits

Tags: #upstreaming_lldb_s_downstream_patches, #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70070
2019-11-12 10:04:32 +01:00
Haibo Huang c6551bf013 Detect HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H in lldb
Summary:
After rL368069 I noticed that HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H is not defined in
Platform.h, or anywhere else in lldb. This change fixes that.

Reviewers: labath

Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65822

llvm-svn: 368125
2019-08-07 06:15:01 +00:00
Jonas Devlieghere 63e5fb76ec [Logging] Replace Log::Printf with LLDB_LOG macro (NFC)
This patch replaces explicit calls to log::Printf with the new LLDB_LOGF
macro. The macro is similar to LLDB_LOG but supports printf-style format
strings, instead of formatv-style format strings.

So instead of writing:

  if (log)
    log->Printf("%s\n", str);

You'd write:

  LLDB_LOG(log, "%s\n", str);

This change was done mechanically with the command below. I replaced the
spurious if-checks with vim, since I know how to do multi-line
replacements with it.

  find . -type f -name '*.cpp' -exec \
  sed -i '' -E 's/log->Printf\(/LLDB_LOGF\(log, /g' "{}" +

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65128

llvm-svn: 366936
2019-07-24 17:56:10 +00:00
Konrad Kleine 248a13057a [lldb] NFC modernize codebase with modernize-use-nullptr
Summary:
NFC = [[ https://llvm.org/docs/Lexicon.html#nfc | Non functional change ]]

This commit is the result of modernizing the LLDB codebase by using
`nullptr` instread of `0` or `NULL`. See
https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-nullptr.html
for more information.

This is the command I ran and I to fix and format the code base:

```
run-clang-tidy.py \
	-header-filter='.*' \
	-checks='-*,modernize-use-nullptr' \
	-fix ~/dev/llvm-project/lldb/.* \
	-format \
	-style LLVM \
	-p ~/llvm-builds/debug-ninja-gcc
```

NOTE: There were also changes to `llvm/utils/unittest` but I did not
include them because I felt that maybe this library shall be updated in
isolation somehow.

NOTE: I know this is a rather large commit but it is a nobrainer in most
parts.

Reviewers: martong, espindola, shafik, #lldb, JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Subscribers: arsenm, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, JDevlieghere, teemperor, rnkovacs, emaste, kubamracek, nemanjai, ki.stfu, javed.absar, arichardson, kbarton, jrtc27, MaskRay, atanasyan, dexonsmith, arphaman, jfb, jsji, jdoerfert, lldb-commits, llvm-commits

Tags: #lldb, #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61847

llvm-svn: 361484
2019-05-23 11:14:47 +00:00
Alex Langford 8b6071f561 [Expression] Remove unused dependency
lldbExpression was linking against lldbPluginExpressionParserClang, and
lldbPluginExpressionParserClang was linking against lldbExpression.
There's no reason lldbExpression should need anything from
lldbPluginExpressionParserClang, so let's remove that dependency.

llvm-svn: 360208
2019-05-07 23:11:05 +00:00
Adrian Prantl 7e34d78da1 Fix an invalid static cast in ClangExpressionParser.cpp
This was found by the green dragon sanitizer bot.

rdar://problem/48536644

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59314

llvm-svn: 356090
2019-03-13 19:46:30 +00:00
Jim Ingham ea401ec7f4 Factor the clang specific parts of ExpressionSourceCode.{h,cpp} into the clang plugin.
NFC

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59040

llvm-svn: 355560
2019-03-06 22:43:25 +00:00
Alex Langford 81dbc02671 [Expression] Remove unused parameter from Evaluate
llvm-svn: 355375
2019-03-05 03:33:34 +00:00
Aleksandr Urakov 40624a085c [Expressions] Add support of expressions evaluation in some object's context
Summary:
This patch adds support of expression evaluation in a context of some object.
Consider the following example:
```
struct S {
  int a = 11;
  int b = 12;
};

int main() {
  S s;
  int a = 1;
  int b = 2;
  // We have stopped here
  return 0;
}
```
This patch allows to do something like that:
```
lldb.frame.FindVariable("s").EvaluateExpression("a + b")
```
and the result will be `33` (not `3`) because fields `a` and `b` of `s` will be
used (not locals `a` and `b`).

This is achieved by replacing of `this` type and object for the expression. This
has some limitations: an expression can be evaluated only for values located in
the debuggee process memory (they must have an address of `eAddressTypeLoad`
type).

Reviewers: teemperor, clayborg, jingham, zturner, labath, davide, spyffe, serge-sans-paille

Reviewed By: jingham

Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits, leonid.mashinskiy

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55318

llvm-svn: 353149
2019-02-05 09:14:36 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 2946cd7010 Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636
2019-01-19 08:50:56 +00:00
Krasimir Georgiev a35912da9f Revert "Return a named error in the result object of an expression with no result"
This reverts commit r344647.
This causes build failures with [-Werror, -Wswitch]. Some cases where the newly
introduced enum value is not handled in particular are in:
  lldb/source/Expression/REPL.cpp:350
  lldb/source/Interpreter/CommandInterpreter.cpp:1529
(maybe there could be more)

As I don't understand lldb to make sure the likely trivial fixes are
correct and also as they might need additional tests, leaving to the
author to resolve.

llvm-svn: 344722
2018-10-18 03:10:43 +00:00
Jim Ingham b1ecc3cac2 Return a named error in the result object of an expression with no result
Before we returned an error that was not exposed in the SB API and no useful
error message.  This change returns eExpressionProducedNoResult and an
appropriate error string.

<rdar://problem/44539514>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53309

llvm-svn: 344647
2018-10-16 21:58:40 +00:00
Adrian Prantl 05097246f3 Reflow paragraphs in comments.
This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit
(r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment
paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read.

FYI, the script I used was:

import textwrap
import commands
import os
import sys
import re
tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1]
out = open(tmp, "w+")
with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f:
  header = ""
  text = ""
  comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$')
  special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$')
  for line in f:
      match = comment.match(line)
      if match and not special.match(match.group(2)):
          # skip intentionally short comments.
          if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40:
              out.write(line)
              continue

          if text:
              text += " " + match.group(2)
          else:
              header = match.group(1)
              text = match.group(2)

          continue

      if text:
          filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)),
                                 break_long_words=False)
          for l in filled:
              out.write(header+" "+l+'\n')
              text = ""

      out.write(line)

os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1])

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144

llvm-svn: 331197
2018-04-30 16:49:04 +00:00
Zachary Turner 97206d5727 Rename Error -> Status.
This renames the LLDB error class to Status, as discussed
on the lldb-dev mailing list.

A change of this magnitude cannot easily be done without
find and replace, but that has potential to catch unwanted
occurrences of common strings such as "Error".  Every effort
was made to find all the obvious things such as the word "Error"
appearing in a string, etc, but it's possible there are still
some lingering occurences left around.  Hopefully nothing too
serious.

llvm-svn: 302872
2017-05-12 04:51:55 +00:00
Zachary Turner 6f9e690199 Move Log from Core -> Utility.
All references to Host and Core have been removed, so this
class can now safely be lowered into Utility.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30559

llvm-svn: 296909
2017-03-03 20:56:28 +00:00
Zachary Turner bf9a77305f Move classes from Core -> Utility.
This moves the following classes from Core -> Utility.

ConstString
Error
RegularExpression
Stream
StreamString

The goal here is to get lldbUtility into a state where it has
no dependendencies except on itself and LLVM, so it can be the
starting point at which to start untangling LLDB's dependencies.
These are all low level and very widely used classes, and
previously lldbUtility had dependencies up to lldbCore in order
to use these classes.  So moving then down to lldbUtility makes
sense from both the short term and long term perspective in
solving this problem.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29427

llvm-svn: 293941
2017-02-02 21:39:50 +00:00