mirror of
https://github.com/encounter/adk-python.git
synced 2026-07-09 18:19:28 -07:00
fix: Annotate response type as None for transfer_to_agent tool and set empty Schema as response schema when tool has no response annotation
1. if a function has no return type annotation, we should treat it as returning any type 2. we use empty schema (with `type` as None) to indicate no type constraints and this is already supported by model server PiperOrigin-RevId: 789808104
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Copybara-Service
parent
faadef167e
commit
86a44873e9
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ def test_auto_to_single():
|
||||
('sub_agent_1', 'response1'),
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
# root_agent should still be the current agent, becaues sub_agent_1 is single.
|
||||
# root_agent should still be the current agent, because sub_agent_1 is single.
|
||||
assert testing_utils.simplify_events(runner.run('test2')) == [
|
||||
('root_agent', 'response2'),
|
||||
]
|
||||
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ def test_auto_to_auto_to_single():
|
||||
def test_auto_to_sequential():
|
||||
response = [
|
||||
transfer_call_part('sub_agent_1'),
|
||||
# sub_agent_1 responds directly instead of transfering.
|
||||
# sub_agent_1 responds directly instead of transferring.
|
||||
'response1',
|
||||
'response2',
|
||||
'response3',
|
||||
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ def test_auto_to_sequential():
|
||||
def test_auto_to_sequential_to_auto():
|
||||
response = [
|
||||
transfer_call_part('sub_agent_1'),
|
||||
# sub_agent_1 responds directly instead of transfering.
|
||||
# sub_agent_1 responds directly instead of transferring.
|
||||
'response1',
|
||||
transfer_call_part('sub_agent_1_2_1'),
|
||||
'response2',
|
||||
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ def test_auto_to_sequential_to_auto():
|
||||
def test_auto_to_loop():
|
||||
response = [
|
||||
transfer_call_part('sub_agent_1'),
|
||||
# sub_agent_1 responds directly instead of transfering.
|
||||
# sub_agent_1 responds directly instead of transferring.
|
||||
'response1',
|
||||
'response2',
|
||||
'response3',
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user