Commit Graph

137 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
b5c7d097ec man: link to freebsd.org for inetd(8) 2015-03-13 23:42:18 -04:00
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
3ba3a79df4 man: fix a bunch of links
All hail linkchecker!
2015-03-13 23:42:18 -04:00
David Herrmann
f407824d75 man: split paragraph
Explicitly put the "multiple EnvironmentFile=" description into its own
paragraph to make it much easier to find.
2015-03-12 12:48:22 +01:00
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
b975b0d514 man: boilerplate unification 2015-02-10 23:24:27 -05:00
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
798d3a524e Reindent man pages to 2ch 2015-02-03 23:11:35 -05:00
Lennart Poettering
c51cbfdcc7 man: document that ProtectSystem= also covers /boot 2015-01-27 02:19:33 +01:00
Ronny Chevalier
6067b34a1f man: document that we set both soft and hard limits for Limit directives
See
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/tree/src/core/load-fragment.c#n1100
2014-11-30 20:45:01 +01:00
Ronny Chevalier
536256fc91 man: fix typos 2014-11-30 20:20:59 +01:00
Ronny Chevalier
b8825fff7b man: document equivalence between Limit directives and ulimit
See https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80341
2014-11-30 20:17:00 +01:00
WaLyong Cho
2ca620c4ed smack: introduce new SmackProcessLabel option
In service file, if the file has some of special SMACK label in
ExecStart= and systemd has no permission for the special SMACK label
then permission error will occurred. To resolve this, systemd should
be able to set its SMACK label to something accessible of ExecStart=.
So introduce new SmackProcessLabel. If label is specified with
SmackProcessLabel= then the child systemd will set its label to
that. To successfully execute the ExecStart=, accessible label should
be specified with SmackProcessLabel=.
Additionally, by SMACK policy, if the file in ExecStart= has no
SMACK64EXEC then the executed process will have given label by
SmackProcessLabel=. But if the file has SMACK64EXEC then the
SMACK64EXEC label will be overridden.

[zj: reword man page]
2014-11-24 10:20:53 -05:00
Lennart Poettering
2134b5ef6b man: SyslogIdentifier= has an effect on journal logging too 2014-10-09 11:37:01 +02:00
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
e060073a8f man: say that SecureBits= are space separated 2014-10-03 21:06:52 -04:00
Michael Biebl
67826132ad man: fix references to systemctl man page which is now in section 1
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=760613
2014-09-06 13:45:18 +02:00
Ruben Kerkhof
06b643e7f5 Fix a few more typos 2014-08-30 13:46:07 -04:00
Ronny Chevalier
8257df2767 man: fix typo 2014-08-18 21:02:07 +02:00
Lennart Poettering
79c1afc67f man: improve documentation for StandardOutput= and StandardInput= 2014-08-11 19:29:25 +02:00
Ansgar Burchardt
ef392da6c5 Correct references to ProtectSystem and ProtectHome in documentation 2014-08-04 09:27:20 -04:00
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
8e8ba962c7 man: proper link for dmesg 2014-07-10 22:52:23 -04:00
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
5aded36978 man: add a mapping for external manpages
It is annoying when we have dead links on fd.o.

Add project='man-pages|die-net|archlinux' to <citerefentry>-ies.

In generated html, add external links to
http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man, http://linux.die.net/man/,
https://www.archlinux.org/.

By default, pages in sections 2 and 4 go to man7, since Michael
Kerrisk is the autorative source on kernel related stuff.

The rest of links goes to linux.die.net, because they have the
manpages.

Except for the pacman stuff, since it seems to be only available from
archlinux.org.

Poor gummiboot gets no link, because gummitboot(8) ain't to be found
on the net. According to common wisdom, that would mean that it does
not exist. But I have seen Kay using it, so I know it does, and
deserves to be found. Can somebody be nice and put it up somewhere?
2014-07-07 18:36:55 -04:00
Jan Engelhardt
8d0e0ddda6 doc: grammatical corrections 2014-06-28 00:06:30 -04:00
Lennart Poettering
d6797c920e namespace: beef up read-only bind mount logic
Instead of blindly creating another bind mount for read-only mounts,
check if there's already one we can use, and if so, use it. Also,
recursively mark all submounts read-only too. Also, ignore autofs mounts
when remounting read-only unless they are already triggered.
2014-06-06 14:37:40 +02:00
Lennart Poettering
5331194c12 core: don't include /boot in effect of ProtectSystem=
This would otherwise unconditionally trigger any /boot autofs mount,
which we probably should avoid.

ProtectSystem= will now only cover /usr and (optionally) /etc, both of
which cannot be autofs anyway.

ProtectHome will continue to cover /run/user and /home. The former
cannot be autofs either. /home could be, however is frequently enough
used (unlikey /boot) so that it isn't too problematic to simply trigger
it unconditionally via ProtectHome=.
2014-06-05 10:03:26 +02:00
Lennart Poettering
1b8689f949 core: rename ReadOnlySystem= to ProtectSystem= and add a third value for also mounting /etc read-only
Also, rename ProtectedHome= to ProtectHome=, to simplify things a bit.

With this in place we now have two neat options ProtectSystem= and
ProtectHome= for protecting the OS itself (and optionally its
configuration), and for protecting the user's data.
2014-06-04 18:12:55 +02:00
Lennart Poettering
417116f234 core: add new ReadOnlySystem= and ProtectedHome= settings for service units
ReadOnlySystem= uses fs namespaces to mount /usr and /boot read-only for
a service.

ProtectedHome= uses fs namespaces to mount /home and /run/user
inaccessible or read-only for a service.

This patch also enables these settings for all our long-running services.

Together they should be good building block for a minimal service
sandbox, removing the ability for services to modify the operating
system or access the user's private data.
2014-06-03 23:57:51 +02:00
Nis Martensen
f1721625e7 fix spelling of privilege 2014-05-19 00:40:44 +09:00