No need to go through the specifier_printf() if the path is already too long in
the unexpanded form (since specifiers increase the length of the string in all
practical cases).
In the oss-fuzz test case, valgrind reports:
total heap usage: 179,044 allocs, 179,044 frees, 72,687,755,703 bytes allocated
and the original config file is ~500kb. This isn't really a security issue,
since the config file has to be trusted any way, but just a matter of
preventing accidental resource exhaustion.
https://oss-fuzz.com/v2/issue/4651449704251392/6977
While at it, fix order of arguments in the neighbouring log_syntax() call.
msan doesn't understand sscanf with %ms, so it falsely reports unitialized
memory. Using sscanf with %ms is quite convenient in
socket_address_parse_netlink(), so let's just not run the fuzzer for
ListenNetlink= at all for now. If msan is fixed, we can remove this.
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=6884
The orignal reproducer from oss-fuzz depends on the hostname (via %H and %c).
The hostname needs a dash for msan to report this, so a simpler case from
@evverx with the dash hardcoded is also added.
The issue is a false positive from msan, which does not instruct stpncpy
(https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/926). Let's add a work-around
until this is fixed.
We have only three bits of space, i.e. 8 possible classes. Immediately reject
anything outside of that range. Add the fuzzer test case and an additional
unit test.
oss-fuzz #6908.
We probably should allow very deep calls of our recursive functions. Let's add
a limit to avoid resource exhaustion. 240 is 10 per hour (if somebody is using
this for time based triggers...), so it should be more than enough for most use
cases, and is conveniently below the 250 stack limit in msan.
oss-fuzz #6917.
Also fix one case where the presence of a newline was used to generate
an invalid environment assignment.
Tested: with mkosi, which builds the local tree and run ninja tests.
gmtime_r() will return NULL in that case, and we would crash.
I committed the reproducer case in fuzz-regressions/, even though we don't have
ubsan hooked up yet. Let's add it anyway in case it is useful in the future. We
actually crash anyway when compiled with asserts, so this can be easily
reproduced without ubsan.
oss-fuzz #6886.
This seems to be a false positive in msan:
https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/767.
I don't see anything wrong with the code either, and valgrind does not see the
issue. Anyway, let's add the test case.
We don't have msan hooked up yet, but hopefully we'll in the future.
oss-fuzz #6884.
We currently have just one sanitizer for tests, asan, but we may add more in
the future. So let's keep the loop over the sanitizers in meson.build, but
just enable all regression cases under all sanitizers. If it fails under one
of them, it might fail under a different one.
In subsequent commits I'll add test cases which might not fail under asan,
but it's good to commit them for future use.
The test names are made more verbose:
256/257 fuzz-dns-packet:oss-fuzz-5465:address OK 0.04 s
257/257 fuzz-dns-packet:issue-7888:address OK 0.03 s
