Since 56b2970 has proven to be a no-go for us, as it breaks existing
links, let's embrace the trailing slash and use absolute links
everywhere for our pages. This way we'll get around browser cleverly
appending the relative link to the current location (since it ends with
a slash), and given our docs/ layout is flat it's not much of a hassle
either.
Converted using this beauty:
$ sed -ri 's/(\[.+\]\()([A-Z_]+\))/\1\/\2/g' *.md
Resolves: #32088 (again) and #32310
This reverts commit 5e8ff010a1.
This broke all the URLs, we can't have that. (And actually, we probably don't
_want_ to make the change either. It's nicer to have all the pages in one
directory, so one doesn't have to figure out to which collection the page
belongs.)
- Mention "/please-review" in the contributing guide
- Remove "needs-rebase" on push
- Don't add "please-review" if a green label is set
- Don't add please-review label to draft PRs
- Add please-review when a PR moves out of draft
The text made it sound like breaking ABI in libsystemd is allowed with good reasons.
In fact, we plan never to do this, so make the language stronger.
Also remind people about distro forums for reporting bugs. Those are probably a
better place than systemd-devel for new users.
Also, add some missing articles and apostrophes, fix URLs, remove repeated phrases,
etc.
The linked filter gives an up-to-date list of pull requests that need review.
(Yes, there's too many.) We used to set 'needs-review' label, but that is
not available to non-members, and also every pull requests which is not labeled
'reviewed/needs-rework'/'ci-fails/needs-rework'/'needs-rebase' can and should
be reviewed.
If this is merged, I'll drop the 'needs-review' label.
A few related changes: be explicit that 'main' is the branch we're referring
to. There was a case recently of somebody rebasing on 'master' by mistake.
It's better to be explicit, since 'main' is still not the default for git
(AFAIK).
Also, github seems to send mails about force-pushes, so drop that as a
justification. Commenting about changes that were done is useful even if
github were to send a notification.
And finally, $subject. We do that ourselves, but outside contributors might not
know that that's expected.
I have no idea if this is going to cause rendering problems, and it is fairly
hard to check. So let's just merge this, and if it github markdown processor
doesn't like it, revert.
