SPDX makes it a simpler diff.
I have audited the commit history of each file to ensure that they are
exclusively authored by IBM and thus we have the right to relicense.
The motivation behind this is twofold:
1) We want to enable experiments with coreboot, which is GPLv2 licensed
2) An upcoming firmware component wants to incorporate code from skiboot
and code from the Linux kernel, which is GPLv2 licensed.
I have gone through the IBM internal way of gaining approval for this.
The following files are not exclusively authored by IBM, so are *not*
included in this update (I will be seeking approval from contributors):
core/direct-controls.c
core/flash.c
core/pcie-slot.c
external/common/arch_flash_unknown.c
external/common/rules.mk
external/gard/Makefile
external/gard/rules.mk
external/opal-prd/Makefile
external/pflash/Makefile
external/xscom-utils/Makefile
hdata/vpd.c
hw/dts.c
hw/ipmi/ipmi-watchdog.c
hw/phb4.c
include/cpu.h
include/phb4.h
include/platform.h
libflash/libffs.c
libstb/mbedtls/sha512.c
libstb/mbedtls/sha512.h
platforms/astbmc/barreleye.c
platforms/astbmc/garrison.c
platforms/astbmc/mihawk.c
platforms/astbmc/nicole.c
platforms/astbmc/p8dnu.c
platforms/astbmc/p8dtu.c
platforms/astbmc/p9dsu.c
platforms/astbmc/vesnin.c
platforms/rhesus/ec/config.h
platforms/rhesus/ec/gpio.h
platforms/rhesus/gpio.c
platforms/rhesus/rhesus.c
platforms/astbmc/talos.c
platforms/astbmc/romulus.c
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.ibm.com>
[oliver: fixed up the drift]
Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
Use Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX) to indicate license for each
file that is unique to skiboot.
At the same time, ensure the (C) who and years are correct.
See https://spdx.org/
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.ibm.com>
[oliver: Added a few missing files]
Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
At the moment ECC reads and writes are still being handled by the low level
core of libflash. ECC should be none of libflashes concern, it is primarily
a hardware access backend.
It makes sense for blocklevel to take care of ECC but currently it has no
way of knowing. With some simple modifications (which are rudimentary at
the moment and will need a performance improvement) blocklevel can handle
ECC, and with a little more effort this can be extended to provide read and
write protection in blocklevel.
Reviewed-By: Alistair Popple <alistair@popple.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <cyril.bur@au1.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Stewart Smith
Cyril Bur