SPDX makes it a simpler diff.
I have audited the commit history of each file to ensure that they are
exclusively authored by IBM and thus we have the right to relicense.
The motivation behind this is twofold:
1) We want to enable experiments with coreboot, which is GPLv2 licensed
2) An upcoming firmware component wants to incorporate code from skiboot
and code from the Linux kernel, which is GPLv2 licensed.
I have gone through the IBM internal way of gaining approval for this.
The following files are not exclusively authored by IBM, so are *not*
included in this update (I will be seeking approval from contributors):
core/direct-controls.c
core/flash.c
core/pcie-slot.c
external/common/arch_flash_unknown.c
external/common/rules.mk
external/gard/Makefile
external/gard/rules.mk
external/opal-prd/Makefile
external/pflash/Makefile
external/xscom-utils/Makefile
hdata/vpd.c
hw/dts.c
hw/ipmi/ipmi-watchdog.c
hw/phb4.c
include/cpu.h
include/phb4.h
include/platform.h
libflash/libffs.c
libstb/mbedtls/sha512.c
libstb/mbedtls/sha512.h
platforms/astbmc/barreleye.c
platforms/astbmc/garrison.c
platforms/astbmc/mihawk.c
platforms/astbmc/nicole.c
platforms/astbmc/p8dnu.c
platforms/astbmc/p8dtu.c
platforms/astbmc/p9dsu.c
platforms/astbmc/vesnin.c
platforms/rhesus/ec/config.h
platforms/rhesus/ec/gpio.h
platforms/rhesus/gpio.c
platforms/rhesus/rhesus.c
platforms/astbmc/talos.c
platforms/astbmc/romulus.c
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.ibm.com>
[oliver: fixed up the drift]
Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
Use Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX) to indicate license for each
file that is unique to skiboot.
At the same time, ensure the (C) who and years are correct.
See https://spdx.org/
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.ibm.com>
[oliver: Added a few missing files]
Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
The caller usually has it and it avoids additional mftb() which
can be expensive.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
[stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com: fix run-timer unit test]
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Due to the lack of SLW timed interrupt support, we take the opportunity
to check out timers on any incoming interrupt. However we really don't
want to do that for the background pollers.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
These have no expiry and get called whenever the opal pollers run,
they are intended to replace most opal pollers and allow the same
code in drivers to chose between a poller or a timer based on things
like interrupt availability for example.
The other advantage over existing pollers (which I hope to deprecate)
is that they are protected against re-entrancy (while still running
without locks held).
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
For now running off the event pollers, that will improve once we get
delayed interrupts from the SLW
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Stewart Smith
Benjamin Herrenschmidt