Remove the support 88PM8607 A0/A1 stepping. There's some register
definition changes in B0 stepping. It can make software more efficient.
Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Rename 88PM8607 to 88PM860X in both Makefile and Kconfig under mfd directory.
Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
88PM8606 and 88PM8607 are two discrete chips used for power management.
Hardware designer can use them together or only one of them according to
requirement.
There's some logic tightly linked between these two chips. For example, USB
charger driver needs to access both chips by I2C interface.
Now share one driver to these two devices. Only one I2C client is identified
in platform init data. If another chip is also used, user should mark it in
companion_addr field of platform init data. Then driver could create another
I2C client for the companion chip.
All I2C operations are accessed by 860x-i2c driver. In order to support both
I2C client address, the read/write API is changed in below.
reg_read(client, offset)
reg_write(client, offset, data)
The benefit is that client drivers only need one kind of read/write API. I2C
and MFD driver can be shared in both 8606 and 8607.
Since API is changed, update API in 8607 regulator driver.
Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 08:40:56PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 11:21:26AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 07:14:03PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > This doesn't help unless you also provide a way for users to obtain a
> > > struct wm8400.
>
> > Why would they need it? Only code that creates instances of wm8400 needs
> > to know the definition of the sturcture, the rest can simply pass the
> > pointer around.
>
> > I guess there is disconnect between us and I do not see any users of
> > wm8400_register_regulator() in linux-next... Is there another tree I
> > could peek at?
>
> There are no users in mainline. This would be called by board specific
> code from the init callback of the wm8400 - you'd need to pass that
> callback the struct wm8400.
>
> In any case, this is clearly an unrelated change to whatever else you
> were doing to the driver so should be split off into a separate patch,
> but if this is being changed at all then it'd be much more sensible to
> change it to use a more modern pattern which completely removes the
> wm8400_register_regulator() function and just uses platform data.
Fair enough, I removed the offending part, updated patch below.
--
Dmitry
regulator: wm8400 - cleanup platform driver data handling
Driver data set by platform_set_drvdata() is for private use of
the driver currently bound to teh device and not for use by parent,
subsystem and anyone else.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
There is no point in completing probe if platform data is missing so
let's abort loading early.
Also, use kcalloc when allocating several instances of the same data
structure and mark setup_regulators() as __devinit since it is only
called from lp3971_i2c_probe() which is __devinit.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Also move error handling in probe() out of line and do not bother
to reset fields in structures that are about to be freed.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Also move error handling in probe() out of line and do not bother
to reset fields in structures that are about to be freed.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Add __devinit/__devexit markings to probe and remove methids of the
driver, change types of variables containing boolean data to boolean,
set up driver's owner field so we have proper sysfs link between
driver and the module.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Probe and remove methods should not be marked as __init/__exit but
rather __devinit/__devexit so that the needed sections stay in memory
in presence of CONFIG_HOTPLUG. This is needed even on non hotpluggable
buses.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Instead of open-coding sysfs attribute group use canned solution.
Also add __devinit/__devexit markups for probe and remove methods
and use 'bool' where it makes sense.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
This is no REMAP register on twl6030, instead there is a STATE register
to drive a resource to a given state.
The state register can be used to specify what state the resource should
enter when its associated with a GRP.
Register Bit field description is as below. The patch programmes the
corresponding STATE registers for all LDO's to turn ON when assocaited
with GRP_P1.
STATE REG:
Bit7 |Bit6 |Bit5 |Bit4 |Bit3 |Bit2 |Bit1 |Bit0
P3_GRP |P2_GRP |P1_GRP |RES |RES |RES |State1 |State0
State can be specified as below
00: OFF
01: ON
10: OFF
11: SLEEP
Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
In order to ease transitions with drivers are boards start using regulators
provide an option to cause all regulator_get() calls to succeed, with a
dummy always on regulator being supplied where one has not been configured.
A warning is printed whenever the dummy regulator is used to aid system
development.
This regulator does not implement any regulator operations but will allow
simple consumers which only do enable() and disable() calls to run. It
is kept separate from the fixed voltage regulator to avoid Kconfig
confusion on the part of users when it is extended to allow boards to
explicitly use the dummy regulator to simplify cases where the majority
of supplies are from fixed regulators without software control.
This option is currently only effective for systems which do not specify
full constriants. If required an override could also be provided to allow
these systems to use the dummy regulator, though it is likely that
unconfigured supplies on such systems will lead to error due to
regulators being powered down more aggressively when not in use.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
If a regulator driver does not provide a way to query if the driver is
enabled then assume that it is enabled. This is very likely to reflect
the actual state is more useful for callers than reporting an error.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
The WM8994 contains two LDOs with mixed hardware/software control to
minimise the number of external supplies required while delivering
optimal voltages to minimise power consumption.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
