Commit Graph

208 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Eric Dumazet
10bbf1652c net: implement lockless SO_PRIORITY
This is a followup of 8bf43be799 ("net: annotate data-races
around sk->sk_priority").

sk->sk_priority can be read and written without holding the socket lock.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2023-10-01 19:09:54 +01:00
David Howells
dc97391e66 sock: Remove ->sendpage*() in favour of sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES)
Remove ->sendpage() and ->sendpage_locked().  sendmsg() with
MSG_SPLICE_PAGES should be used instead.  This allows multiple pages and
multipage folios to be passed through.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> # for net/can
cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
cc: mptcp@lists.linux.dev
cc: rds-devel@oss.oracle.com
cc: tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230623225513.2732256-16-dhowells@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2023-06-24 15:50:13 -07:00
Hyunwoo Kim
14caefcf98 net/rose: Fix to not accept on connected socket
If you call listen() and accept() on an already connect()ed
rose socket, accept() can successfully connect.
This is because when the peer socket sends data to sendmsg,
the skb with its own sk stored in the connected socket's
sk->sk_receive_queue is connected, and rose_accept() dequeues
the skb waiting in the sk->sk_receive_queue.

This creates a child socket with the sk of the parent
rose socket, which can cause confusion.

Fix rose_listen() to return -EINVAL if the socket has
already been successfully connected, and add lock_sock
to prevent this issue.

Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim <v4bel@theori.io>
Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230125105944.GA133314@ubuntu
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2023-01-28 00:19:57 -08:00
Zhang Qilong
e97c089d7a rose: Fix NULL pointer dereference in rose_send_frame()
The syzkaller reported an issue:

KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000380-0x0000000000000387]
CPU: 0 PID: 4069 Comm: kworker/0:15 Not tainted 6.0.0-syzkaller-02734-g0326074ff465 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/22/2022
Workqueue: rcu_gp srcu_invoke_callbacks
RIP: 0010:rose_send_frame+0x1dd/0x2f0 net/rose/rose_link.c:101
Call Trace:
 <IRQ>
 rose_transmit_clear_request+0x1d5/0x290 net/rose/rose_link.c:255
 rose_rx_call_request+0x4c0/0x1bc0 net/rose/af_rose.c:1009
 rose_loopback_timer+0x19e/0x590 net/rose/rose_loopback.c:111
 call_timer_fn+0x1a0/0x6b0 kernel/time/timer.c:1474
 expire_timers kernel/time/timer.c:1519 [inline]
 __run_timers.part.0+0x674/0xa80 kernel/time/timer.c:1790
 __run_timers kernel/time/timer.c:1768 [inline]
 run_timer_softirq+0xb3/0x1d0 kernel/time/timer.c:1803
 __do_softirq+0x1d0/0x9c8 kernel/softirq.c:571
 [...]
 </IRQ>

It triggers NULL pointer dereference when 'neigh->dev->dev_addr' is
called in the rose_send_frame(). It's the first occurrence of the
`neigh` is in rose_loopback_timer() as `rose_loopback_neigh', and
the 'dev' in 'rose_loopback_neigh' is initialized sa nullptr.

It had been fixed by commit 3b3fd068c5
("rose: Fix Null pointer dereference in rose_send_frame()") ever.
But it's introduced by commit 3c53cd65de
("rose: check NULL rose_loopback_neigh->loopback") again.

We fix it by add NULL check in rose_transmit_clear_request(). When
the 'dev' in 'neigh' is NULL, we don't reply the request and just
clear it.

syzkaller don't provide repro, and I provide a syz repro like:
r0 = syz_init_net_socket$bt_sco(0x1f, 0x5, 0x2)
ioctl$sock_inet_SIOCSIFFLAGS(r0, 0x8914, &(0x7f0000000180)={'rose0\x00', 0x201})
r1 = syz_init_net_socket$rose(0xb, 0x5, 0x0)
bind$rose(r1, &(0x7f00000000c0)=@full={0xb, @dev, @null, 0x0, [@null, @null, @netrom, @netrom, @default, @null]}, 0x40)
connect$rose(r1, &(0x7f0000000240)=@short={0xb, @dev={0xbb, 0xbb, 0xbb, 0x1, 0x0}, @remote={0xcc, 0xcc, 0xcc, 0xcc, 0xcc, 0xcc, 0x1}, 0x1, @netrom={0xbb, 0xbb, 0xbb, 0xbb, 0xbb, 0x0, 0x0}}, 0x1c)

Fixes: 3c53cd65de ("rose: check NULL rose_loopback_neigh->loopback")
Signed-off-by: Zhang Qilong <zhangqilong3@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-11-02 11:57:30 +00:00
Bernard Pidoux
3c53cd65de rose: check NULL rose_loopback_neigh->loopback
Commit 3b3fd068c5 added NULL check for
`rose_loopback_neigh->dev` in rose_loopback_timer() but omitted to
check rose_loopback_neigh->loopback.

It thus prevents *all* rose connect.

The reason is that a special rose_neigh loopback has a NULL device.

/proc/net/rose_neigh illustrates it via rose_neigh_show() function :
[...]
seq_printf(seq, "%05d %-9s %-4s   %3d %3d  %3s     %3s %3lu %3lu",
	   rose_neigh->number,
	   (rose_neigh->loopback) ? "RSLOOP-0" : ax2asc(buf, &rose_neigh->callsign),
	   rose_neigh->dev ? rose_neigh->dev->name : "???",
	   rose_neigh->count,

/proc/net/rose_neigh displays special rose_loopback_neigh->loopback as
callsign RSLOOP-0:

addr  callsign  dev  count use mode restart  t0  tf digipeaters
00001 RSLOOP-0  ???      1   2  DCE     yes   0   0

By checking rose_loopback_neigh->loopback, rose_rx_call_request() is called
even in case rose_loopback_neigh->dev is NULL. This repairs rose connections.

Verification with rose client application FPAC:

FPAC-Node v 4.1.3 (built Aug  5 2022) for LINUX (help = h)
F6BVP-4 (Commands = ?) : u
Users - AX.25 Level 2 sessions :
Port   Callsign     Callsign  AX.25 state  ROSE state  NetRom status
axudp  F6BVP-5   -> F6BVP-9   Connected    Connected   ---------

Fixes: 3b3fd068c5 ("rose: Fix Null pointer dereference in rose_send_frame()")
Signed-off-by: Bernard Pidoux <f6bvp@free.fr>
Suggested-by: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
Cc: Thomas DL9SAU Osterried <thomas@osterried.de>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-08-22 14:24:54 +01:00
Eric Dumazet
2df91e397d net: rose: add netdev ref tracker to 'struct rose_sock'
This will help debugging netdevice refcount problems with
CONFIG_NET_DEV_REFCNT_TRACKER=y

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Tested-by: Bernard Pidoux <f6bvp@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2022-08-01 11:59:23 -07:00
Eric Dumazet
931027820e net: rose: fix netdev reference changes
Bernard reported that trying to unload rose module would lead
to infamous messages:

unregistered_netdevice: waiting for rose0 to become free. Usage count = xx

This patch solves the issue, by making sure each socket referring to
a netdevice holds a reference count on it, and properly releases it
in rose_release().

rose_dev_first() is also fixed to take a device reference
before leaving the rcu_read_locked section.

Following patch will add ref_tracker annotations to ease
future bug hunting.

Fixes: 1da177e4c3 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Reported-by: Bernard Pidoux <f6bvp@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Tested-by: Bernard Pidoux <f6bvp@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2022-08-01 11:59:23 -07:00
Duoming Zhou
148ca04518 net: rose: fix UAF bug caused by rose_t0timer_expiry
There are UAF bugs caused by rose_t0timer_expiry(). The
root cause is that del_timer() could not stop the timer
handler that is running and there is no synchronization.
One of the race conditions is shown below:

    (thread 1)             |        (thread 2)
                           | rose_device_event
                           |   rose_rt_device_down
                           |     rose_remove_neigh
rose_t0timer_expiry        |       rose_stop_t0timer(rose_neigh)
  ...                      |         del_timer(&neigh->t0timer)
                           |         kfree(rose_neigh) //[1]FREE
  neigh->dce_mode //[2]USE |

The rose_neigh is deallocated in position [1] and use in
position [2].

The crash trace triggered by POC is like below:

BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in expire_timers+0x144/0x320
Write of size 8 at addr ffff888009b19658 by task swapper/0/0
...
Call Trace:
 <IRQ>
 dump_stack_lvl+0xbf/0xee
 print_address_description+0x7b/0x440
 print_report+0x101/0x230
 ? expire_timers+0x144/0x320
 kasan_report+0xed/0x120
 ? expire_timers+0x144/0x320
 expire_timers+0x144/0x320
 __run_timers+0x3ff/0x4d0
 run_timer_softirq+0x41/0x80
 __do_softirq+0x233/0x544
 ...

This patch changes rose_stop_ftimer() and rose_stop_t0timer()
in rose_remove_neigh() to del_timer_sync() in order that the
timer handler could be finished before the resources such as
rose_neigh and so on are deallocated. As a result, the UAF
bugs could be mitigated.

Fixes: 1da177e4c3 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou <duoming@zju.edu.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220705125610.77971-1-duoming@zju.edu.cn
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2022-07-06 19:49:11 -07:00
Duoming Zhou
9cc02ede69 net: rose: fix UAF bugs caused by timer handler
There are UAF bugs in rose_heartbeat_expiry(), rose_timer_expiry()
and rose_idletimer_expiry(). The root cause is that del_timer()
could not stop the timer handler that is running and the refcount
of sock is not managed properly.

One of the UAF bugs is shown below:

    (thread 1)          |        (thread 2)
                        |  rose_bind
                        |  rose_connect
                        |    rose_start_heartbeat
rose_release            |    (wait a time)
  case ROSE_STATE_0     |
  rose_destroy_socket   |  rose_heartbeat_expiry
    rose_stop_heartbeat |
    sock_put(sk)        |    ...
  sock_put(sk) // FREE  |
                        |    bh_lock_sock(sk) // USE

The sock is deallocated by sock_put() in rose_release() and
then used by bh_lock_sock() in rose_heartbeat_expiry().

Although rose_destroy_socket() calls rose_stop_heartbeat(),
it could not stop the timer that is running.

The KASAN report triggered by POC is shown below:

BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in _raw_spin_lock+0x5a/0x110
Write of size 4 at addr ffff88800ae59098 by task swapper/3/0
...
Call Trace:
 <IRQ>
 dump_stack_lvl+0xbf/0xee
 print_address_description+0x7b/0x440
 print_report+0x101/0x230
 ? irq_work_single+0xbb/0x140
 ? _raw_spin_lock+0x5a/0x110
 kasan_report+0xed/0x120
 ? _raw_spin_lock+0x5a/0x110
 kasan_check_range+0x2bd/0x2e0
 _raw_spin_lock+0x5a/0x110
 rose_heartbeat_expiry+0x39/0x370
 ? rose_start_heartbeat+0xb0/0xb0
 call_timer_fn+0x2d/0x1c0
 ? rose_start_heartbeat+0xb0/0xb0
 expire_timers+0x1f3/0x320
 __run_timers+0x3ff/0x4d0
 run_timer_softirq+0x41/0x80
 __do_softirq+0x233/0x544
 irq_exit_rcu+0x41/0xa0
 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x8c/0xb0
 </IRQ>
 <TASK>
 asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1b/0x20
RIP: 0010:default_idle+0xb/0x10
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000012fea0 EFLAGS: 00000202
RAX: 000000000000bcae RBX: ffff888006660f00 RCX: 000000000000bcae
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffff843a11c0 RDI: ffffffff843a1180
RBP: dffffc0000000000 R08: dffffc0000000000 R09: ffffed100da36d46
R10: dfffe9100da36d47 R11: ffffffff83cf0950 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 1ffff11000ccc1e0 R14: ffffffff8542af28 R15: dffffc0000000000
...
Allocated by task 146:
 __kasan_kmalloc+0xc4/0xf0
 sk_prot_alloc+0xdd/0x1a0
 sk_alloc+0x2d/0x4e0
 rose_create+0x7b/0x330
 __sock_create+0x2dd/0x640
 __sys_socket+0xc7/0x270
 __x64_sys_socket+0x71/0x80
 do_syscall_64+0x43/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0

Freed by task 152:
 kasan_set_track+0x4c/0x70
 kasan_set_free_info+0x1f/0x40
 ____kasan_slab_free+0x124/0x190
 kfree+0xd3/0x270
 __sk_destruct+0x314/0x460
 rose_release+0x2fa/0x3b0
 sock_close+0xcb/0x230
 __fput+0x2d9/0x650
 task_work_run+0xd6/0x160
 exit_to_user_mode_loop+0xc7/0xd0
 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x4e/0x80
 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x20/0x40
 do_syscall_64+0x4f/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0

This patch adds refcount of sock when we use functions
such as rose_start_heartbeat() and so on to start timer,
and decreases the refcount of sock when timer is finished
or deleted by functions such as rose_stop_heartbeat()
and so on. As a result, the UAF bugs could be mitigated.

Fixes: 1da177e4c3 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou <duoming@zju.edu.cn>
Tested-by: Duoming Zhou <duoming@zju.edu.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220629002640.5693-1-duoming@zju.edu.cn
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
2022-06-30 11:07:30 +02:00
Jiapeng Chong
eef0dc7e51 ROSE: Remove unused code and clean up some inconsistent indenting
Eliminate the follow smatch warning:

net/rose/rose_route.c:1136 rose_node_show() warn: inconsistent
indenting.

Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220507034207.18651-1-jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2022-05-09 17:19:27 -07:00
Oliver Hartkopp
f4b41f062c net: remove noblock parameter from skb_recv_datagram()
skb_recv_datagram() has two parameters 'flags' and 'noblock' that are
merged inside skb_recv_datagram() by 'flags | (noblock ? MSG_DONTWAIT : 0)'

As 'flags' may contain MSG_DONTWAIT as value most callers split the 'flags'
into 'flags' and 'noblock' with finally obsolete bit operations like this:

skb_recv_datagram(sk, flags & ~MSG_DONTWAIT, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT, &rc);

And this is not even done consistently with the 'flags' parameter.

This patch removes the obsolete and costly splitting into two parameters
and only performs bit operations when really needed on the caller side.

One missing conversion thankfully reported by kernel test robot. I missed
to enable kunit tests to build the mctp code.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-04-06 13:45:26 +01:00
Jakub Kicinski
b6459415b3 net: Don't include filter.h from net/sock.h
sock.h is pretty heavily used (5k objects rebuilt on x86 after
it's touched). We can drop the include of filter.h from it and
add a forward declaration of struct sk_filter instead.
This decreases the number of rebuilt objects when bpf.h
is touched from ~5k to ~1k.

There's a lot of missing includes this was masking. Primarily
in networking tho, this time.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211229004913.513372-1-kuba@kernel.org
2021-12-29 08:48:14 -08:00
Jakub Kicinski
db95732446 rose: constify dev_addr passing
In preparation for netdev->dev_addr being constant
make all relevant arguments in rose constant.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-10-13 09:40:45 -07:00
Jakub Kicinski
c045ad2cc0 ax25: constify dev_addr passing
In preparation for netdev->dev_addr being constant
make all relevant arguments in AX25 constant.

Modify callers as well (netrom, rose).

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-10-13 09:40:45 -07:00
Jakub Kicinski
ea52a0b58e net: use dev_addr_set()
Use dev_addr_set() instead of writing directly to netdev->dev_addr
in various misc and old drivers.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-10-09 11:55:01 +01:00
Gustavo A. R. Silva
90d181ca48 net: rose: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang
In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple
warnings by explicitly adding multiple break statements instead of
letting the code fall through to the next case.

Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-03-10 12:45:15 -08:00
Anmol Karn
3b3fd068c5 rose: Fix Null pointer dereference in rose_send_frame()
rose_send_frame() dereferences `neigh->dev` when called from
rose_transmit_clear_request(), and the first occurrence of the
`neigh` is in rose_loopback_timer() as `rose_loopback_neigh`,
and it is initialized in rose_add_loopback_neigh() as NULL.
i.e when `rose_loopback_neigh` used in rose_loopback_timer()
its `->dev` was still NULL and rose_loopback_timer() was calling
rose_rx_call_request() without checking for NULL.

- net/rose/rose_link.c
This bug seems to get triggered in this line:

rose_call = (ax25_address *)neigh->dev->dev_addr;

Fix it by adding NULL checking for `rose_loopback_neigh->dev`
in rose_loopback_timer().

Fixes: 1da177e4c3 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Reported-by: syzbot+a1c743815982d9496393@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Tested-by: syzbot+a1c743815982d9496393@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=9d2a7ca8c7f2e4b682c97578dfa3f236258300b3
Signed-off-by: Anmol Karn <anmol.karan123@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201119191043.28813-1-anmol.karan123@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2020-11-20 10:04:58 -08:00
Gustavo A. R. Silva
df561f6688 treewide: Use fallthrough pseudo-keyword
Replace the existing /* fall through */ comments and its variants with
the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough[1]. Also, remove unnecessary
fall-through markings when it is the case.

[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.7/process/deprecated.html?highlight=fallthrough#implicit-switch-case-fall-through

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-08-23 17:36:59 -05:00
Christoph Hellwig
a7b75c5a8c net: pass a sockptr_t into ->setsockopt
Rework the remaining setsockopt code to pass a sockptr_t instead of a
plain user pointer.  This removes the last remaining set_fs(KERNEL_DS)
outside of architecture specific code.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Acked-by: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@datenfreihafen.org> [ieee802154]
Acked-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-07-24 15:41:54 -07:00
Cong Wang
845e0ebb44 net: change addr_list_lock back to static key
The dynamic key update for addr_list_lock still causes troubles,
for example the following race condition still exists:

CPU 0:				CPU 1:
(RCU read lock)			(RTNL lock)
dev_mc_seq_show()		netdev_update_lockdep_key()
				  -> lockdep_unregister_key()
 -> netif_addr_lock_bh()

because lockdep doesn't provide an API to update it atomically.
Therefore, we have to move it back to static keys and use subclass
for nest locking like before.

In commit 1a33e10e4a ("net: partially revert dynamic lockdep key
changes"), I already reverted most parts of commit ab92d68fc2
("net: core: add generic lockdep keys").

This patch reverts the rest and also part of commit f3b0a18bb6
("net: remove unnecessary variables and callback"). After this
patch, addr_list_lock changes back to using static keys and
subclasses to satisfy lockdep. Thanks to dev->lower_level, we do
not have to change back to ->ndo_get_lock_subclass().

And hopefully this reduces some syzbot lockdep noises too.

Reported-by: syzbot+f3a0e80c34b3fc28ac5e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Cc: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-06-09 12:59:45 -07:00
Cong Wang
1a33e10e4a net: partially revert dynamic lockdep key changes
This patch reverts the folowing commits:

commit 064ff66e2b
"bonding: add missing netdev_update_lockdep_key()"

commit 53d374979e
"net: avoid updating qdisc_xmit_lock_key in netdev_update_lockdep_key()"

commit 1f26c0d3d2
"net: fix kernel-doc warning in <linux/netdevice.h>"

commit ab92d68fc2
"net: core: add generic lockdep keys"

but keeps the addr_list_lock_key because we still lock
addr_list_lock nestedly on stack devices, unlikely xmit_lock
this is safe because we don't take addr_list_lock on any fast
path.

Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+aaa6fa4949cc5d9b7b25@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-05-04 12:05:56 -07:00
David S. Miller
4d8773b68e Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net
Minor conflict in mlx5 because changes happened to code that has
moved meanwhile.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-01-26 10:40:21 +01:00
Colin Ian King
4d299f1833 net/rose: fix spelling mistake "to" -> "too"
There is a spelling mistake in a printk message. Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-01-24 08:12:06 +01:00
Colin Ian King
53ebeca24a net/rose: remove redundant assignment to variable failed
The variable failed is being assigned a value that is never read, the
following goto statement jumps to the end of the function and variable
failed is not referenced at all.  Remove the redundant assignment.

Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-01-07 13:52:28 -08:00
Eric Dumazet
7976a11b30 net: use helpers to change sk_ack_backlog
Writers are holding a lock, but many readers do not.

Following patch will add appropriate barriers in
sk_acceptq_removed() and sk_acceptq_added().

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-11-06 16:14:48 -08:00