syzkaller found a memory leak in kcm_sendmsg(), and commit c821a88bd7
("kcm: Fix memory leak in error path of kcm_sendmsg()") suppressed it by
updating kcm_tx_msg(head)->last_skb if partial data is copied so that the
following sendmsg() will resume from the skb.
However, we cannot know how many bytes were copied when we get the error.
Thus, we could mess up the MSG_MORE queue.
When kcm_sendmsg() fails for SOCK_DGRAM, we should purge the queue as we
do so for UDP by udp_flush_pending_frames().
Even without this change, when the error occurred, the following sendmsg()
resumed from a wrong skb and the queue was messed up. However, we have
yet to get such a report, and only syzkaller stumbled on it. So, this
can be changed safely.
Note this does not change SOCK_SEQPACKET behaviour.
Fixes: c821a88bd7 ("kcm: Fix memory leak in error path of kcm_sendmsg()")
Fixes: ab7ac4eb98 ("kcm: Kernel Connection Multiplexor module")
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912022753.33327-1-kuniyu@amazon.com
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Rewrite the AF_KCM transmission loop to send all the fragments in a single
skb or frag_list-skb in one sendmsg() with MSG_SPLICE_PAGES set. The list
of fragments in each skb is conveniently a bio_vec[] that can just be
attached to a BVEC iter.
Note: I'm working out the size of each fragment-skb by adding up bv_len for
all the bio_vecs in skb->frags[] - but surely this information is recorded
somewhere? For the skbs in head->frag_list, this is equal to
skb->data_len, but not for the head. head->data_len includes all the tail
frags too.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
cc: Tom Herbert <tom@quantonium.net>
cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Convert kcm_sendpage() to use sendmsg() with MSG_SPLICE_PAGES rather than
directly splicing in the pages itself.
This allows ->sendpage() to be replaced by something that can handle
multiple multipage folios in a single transaction.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
cc: Tom Herbert <tom@quantonium.net>
cc: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Make AF_KCM sendmsg() support MSG_SPLICE_PAGES. This causes pages to be
spliced from the source iterator if possible.
This allows ->sendpage() to be replaced by something that can handle
multiple multipage folios in a single transaction.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
cc: Tom Herbert <tom@quantonium.net>
cc: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
As suggested by Cong, introduce a tracepoint for all ->sk_data_ready()
callback implementations. For example:
<...>
iperf-609 [002] ..... 70.660425: sk_data_ready: family=2 protocol=6 func=sock_def_readable
iperf-609 [002] ..... 70.660436: sk_data_ready: family=2 protocol=6 func=sock_def_readable
<...>
Suggested-by: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Peilin Ye <peilin.ye@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
sk->sk_receive_queue is protected by skb queue lock, but for KCM
sockets its RX path takes mux->rx_lock to protect more than just
skb queue. However, kcm_recvmsg() still only grabs the skb queue
lock, so race conditions still exist.
We can teach kcm_recvmsg() to grab mux->rx_lock too but this would
introduce a potential performance regression as struct kcm_mux can
be shared by multiple KCM sockets.
So we have to enforce skb queue lock in requeue_rx_msgs() and handle
skb peek case carefully in kcm_wait_data(). Fortunately,
skb_recv_datagram() already handles it nicely and is widely used by
other sockets, we can just switch to skb_recv_datagram() after
getting rid of the unnecessary sock lock in kcm_recvmsg() and
kcm_splice_read(). Side note: SOCK_DONE is not used by KCM sockets,
so it is safe to get rid of this check too.
I ran the original syzbot reproducer for 30 min without seeing any
issue.
Fixes: ab7ac4eb98 ("kcm: Kernel Connection Multiplexor module")
Reported-by: syzbot+278279efdd2730dd14bf@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: shaozhengchao <shaozhengchao@huawei.com>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221114005119.597905-1-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
kcm->rx_psock can be read locklessly in kcm_rfree().
Annotate the read and writes accordingly.
We do the same for kcm->rx_wait in the following patch.
syzbot reported:
BUG: KCSAN: data-race in kcm_rfree / unreserve_rx_kcm
write to 0xffff888123d827b8 of 8 bytes by task 2758 on cpu 1:
unreserve_rx_kcm+0x72/0x1f0 net/kcm/kcmsock.c:313
kcm_rcv_strparser+0x2b5/0x3a0 net/kcm/kcmsock.c:373
__strp_recv+0x64c/0xd20 net/strparser/strparser.c:301
strp_recv+0x6d/0x80 net/strparser/strparser.c:335
tcp_read_sock+0x13e/0x5a0 net/ipv4/tcp.c:1703
strp_read_sock net/strparser/strparser.c:358 [inline]
do_strp_work net/strparser/strparser.c:406 [inline]
strp_work+0xe8/0x180 net/strparser/strparser.c:415
process_one_work+0x3d3/0x720 kernel/workqueue.c:2289
worker_thread+0x618/0xa70 kernel/workqueue.c:2436
kthread+0x1a9/0x1e0 kernel/kthread.c:376
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:306
read to 0xffff888123d827b8 of 8 bytes by task 5859 on cpu 0:
kcm_rfree+0x14c/0x220 net/kcm/kcmsock.c:181
skb_release_head_state+0x8e/0x160 net/core/skbuff.c:841
skb_release_all net/core/skbuff.c:852 [inline]
__kfree_skb net/core/skbuff.c:868 [inline]
kfree_skb_reason+0x5c/0x260 net/core/skbuff.c:891
kfree_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1216 [inline]
kcm_recvmsg+0x226/0x2b0 net/kcm/kcmsock.c:1161
____sys_recvmsg+0x16c/0x2e0
___sys_recvmsg net/socket.c:2743 [inline]
do_recvmmsg+0x2f1/0x710 net/socket.c:2837
__sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:2916 [inline]
__do_sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:2939 [inline]
__se_sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:2932 [inline]
__x64_sys_recvmmsg+0xde/0x160 net/socket.c:2932
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x2b/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
value changed: 0xffff88812971ce00 -> 0x0000000000000000
Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on:
CPU: 0 PID: 5859 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 6.0.0-syzkaller-12189-g19d17ab7c68b-dirty #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/22/2022
Fixes: ab7ac4eb98 ("kcm: Kernel Connection Multiplexor module")
Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
sock.h is pretty heavily used (5k objects rebuilt on x86 after
it's touched). We can drop the include of filter.h from it and
add a forward declaration of struct sk_filter instead.
This decreases the number of rebuilt objects when bpf.h
is touched from ~5k to ~1k.
There's a lot of missing includes this was masking. Primarily
in networking tho, this time.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211229004913.513372-1-kuba@kernel.org
This patch introduces a function wrapper to call the sk_error_report
callback. That will prepare to add additional handling whenever
sk_error_report is called, for example to trace socket errors.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In commit c47cc30499 ("net: kcm: fix memory leak in kcm_sendmsg")
I misunderstood the root case of the memory leak and came up with
completely broken fix.
So, simply revert this commit to avoid GPF reported by
syzbot.
Im so sorry for this situation.
Fixes: c47cc30499 ("net: kcm: fix memory leak in kcm_sendmsg")
Reported-by: syzbot+65badd5e74ec62cb67dc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Syzbot reported memory leak in kcm_sendmsg()[1].
The problem was in non-freed frag_list in case of error.
In the while loop:
if (head == skb)
skb_shinfo(head)->frag_list = tskb;
else
skb->next = tskb;
frag_list filled with skbs, but nothing was freeing them.
backtrace:
[<0000000094c02615>] __alloc_skb+0x5e/0x250 net/core/skbuff.c:198
[<00000000e5386cbd>] alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1083 [inline]
[<00000000e5386cbd>] kcm_sendmsg+0x3b6/0xa50 net/kcm/kcmsock.c:967 [1]
[<00000000f1613a8a>] sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:652 [inline]
[<00000000f1613a8a>] sock_sendmsg+0x4c/0x60 net/socket.c:672
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+b039f5699bd82e1fb011@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: ab7ac4eb98 ("kcm: Kernel Connection Multiplexor module")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
s/synchonization/synchronization/
s/aready/already/
Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In preparation for expanded zerocopy (TX and RX), move
the zerocopy related bits out of tx_flags into their own
flag word.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
The function sockfd_lookup uses fget on the value that is stored in
the file field of the returned structure, so fput should ultimately be
applied to this value. This can be done directly, but it seems better
to use the specific macro sockfd_put, which does the same thing.
Perform a source code refactoring by using the following semantic patch.
// <smpl>
@@
expression s;
@@
s = sockfd_lookup(...)
...
+ sockfd_put(s);
- fput(s->file);
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
