A final attempt at enabling sse2 for GCC users.
Orininally attempted in:
commit 1011745073 ("drm/amd/display: add -msse2 to prevent Clang from emitting libcalls to undefined SW FP routines")
Reverted due to "reported instability" in:
commit 193392ed9f ("Revert "drm/amd/display: add -msse2 to prevent Clang from emitting libcalls to undefined SW FP routines"")
Re-added just for Clang in:
commit 0f0727d971 ("drm/amd/display: readd -msse2 to prevent Clang from emitting libcalls to undefined SW FP routines")
The original report didn't have enough information to know if the GPF
was due to misalignment, but I suspect that it was. (The missing
information was the disassembly of the function at the bottom of the
trace, to see if the instruction pointer pointed to an instruction with
16B alignment memory operand requirements. The stack trace does show
the stack was only 8B but not 16B aligned though, which makes this a
strong possibility).
Now that the stack misalignment issue has been fixed for users of GCC
7.1+, reattempt adding -msse2. This matches Clang.
It will likely never be safe to enable this for pre-GCC 7.1 AND use a
16B aligned stack in these translation units.
This is only a functional change for GCC 7.1+ users, and should be boot
tested.
Link: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109487
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
GCC earlier than 7.1 errors when compiling code that makes use of
`double`s and sets a stack alignment outside of the range of [2^4-2^12]:
$ cat foo.c
double foo(double x, double y) {
return x + y;
}
$ gcc-4.9 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3 foo.c
error: -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3 is not between 4 and 12
This is likely why the AMDGPU driver was ever compiled with a different
stack alignment (and thus different ABI) than the rest of the x86
kernel. The kernel uses 8B stack alignment, while the driver was using
16B stack alignment in a few places.
Since GCC 7.1+ doesn't error, fix the ABI mismatch for users of newer
versions of GCC.
There was discussion about whether to mark the driver broken or not for
users of GCC earlier than 7.1, but since the driver currently is
working, don't explicitly break the driver for them here.
Relying on differing stack alignment is unspecified behavior, and
brittle, and may break in the future.
This patch is no functional change for GCC users earlier than 7.1. It's
been compile tested on GCC 4.9 and 8.3 to check the correct flags. It
should be boot tested when built with GCC 7.1+.
-mincoming-stack-boundary= or -mstackrealign may help keep this code
building for pre-GCC 7.1 users.
The version check for GCC is broken into two conditionals, both because
cc-ifversion is currently GCC specific, and it simplifies a subsequent
patch.
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The x86 kernel is compiled with an 8B stack alignment via
`-mpreferred-stack-boundary=3` for GCC since 3.6-rc1 via
commit d9b0cde91c ("x86-64, gcc: Use -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3 if supported")
or `-mstack-alignment=8` for Clang. Parts of the AMDGPU driver are
compiled with 16B stack alignment.
Generally, the stack alignment is part of the ABI. Linking together two
different translation units with differing stack alignment is dangerous,
particularly when the translation unit with the smaller stack alignment
makes calls into the translation unit with the larger stack alignment.
While 8B aligned stacks are sometimes also 16B aligned, they are not
always.
Multiple users have reported General Protection Faults (GPF) when using
the AMDGPU driver compiled with Clang. Clang is placing objects in stack
slots assuming the stack is 16B aligned, and selecting instructions that
require 16B aligned memory operands.
At runtime, syscall handlers with 8B aligned stack call into code that
assumes 16B stack alignment. When the stack is a multiple of 8B but not
16B, these instructions result in a GPF.
Remove the code that added compatibility between the differing compiler
flags, as it will result in runtime GPFs when built with Clang. Cleanups
for GCC will be sent in later patches in the series.
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/735
Debugged-by: Yuxuan Shui <yshuiv7@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Shirish S <shirish.s@amd.com>
Reported-by: Yuxuan Shui <yshuiv7@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
During kexec some adapters hit an EEH since they are not properly
shut down in the radeon_pci_shutdown() function. Adding
radeon_suspend_kms() fixes this issue.
Enabled only on PPC because this patch causes issues on some other
boards.
Signed-off-by: Kyle Mahlkuch <kmahlkuc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
This patch is for fixing Navi14 HDMI display pink screen issue.
[How]
Call stream->link->link_enc->funcs->setup twice. This is setting
the DIG_MODE to the correct value after having been overridden by
the call to transmitter control.
Signed-off-by: Zhan Liu <zhan.liu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHY]
i2c_read is called to differentiate passive DP->HDMI and DP->DVI-D dongles
The call is expected to fail in DVI-D case but pass in HDMI case
Some HDMI dongles have a chance to fail as well, causing misdetection as DVI-D
[HOW]
Retry i2c_read to ensure failed result is valid
Signed-off-by: Michael Strauss <michael.strauss@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Cheng <Tony.Cheng@amd.com>
Acked-by: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
A display that supports DRR can never really be considered
"synchronized" with any other display because we can dynamically
enable DRR (i.e. without modeset). this will cause their
relative CRTC positions to drift and lose sync. this will disrupt
features such as MCLK switching that assume and depend on
their permanent alignment (that can only change with modeset)
[how]
check for ignore_msa in stream when considered synchronizability
this ignore_msa is basically actually implemented as "supports drr"
Signed-off-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Yongqiang Sun <yongqiang.sun@amd.com>
Acked-by: Anthony Koo <Anthony.Koo@amd.com>
Acked-by: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Problem:
When run_job fails and HW fence returned is NULL we still signal
the s_fence to avoid hangs but the user has no way of knowing if
the actual HW job was ran and finished.
Fix:
Allow .run_job implementations to return ERR_PTR in the fence pointer
returned and then set this error for s_fence->finished fence so whoever
wait on this fence can inspect the signaled fence for an error.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
DWB (Display Writeback) flag needs to be enabled as 1, or system
will throw out a few warnings when creating dcn20 resource pool.
Also, Navi14's dwb setting needs to match Navi10's,
which has already been set to 1.
[How]
Change value of num_dwb from 0 to 1.
Signed-off-by: Zhan Liu <zhan.liu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
