This primarily comes from running pylint over kunit tool code and
ignoring some warnings we don't care about.
If we ever got a fully clean setup, we could add this to run_checks.py,
but we're not there yet.
Fix things like
* Drop unused imports
* check `is None`, not `== None` (see PEP 8)
* remove redundant parens around returns
* remove redundant `else` / convert `elif` to `if` where appropriate
* rename make_arch_qemuconfig() param to base_kunitconfig (this is the
name used in the subclass, and it's a better one)
* kunit_tool_test: check the exit code for SystemExit (could be 0)
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Before, our help output contained lines like
--kconfig_add KCONFIG_ADD
--qemu_config qemu_config
--jobs jobs
They're not very helpful.
The former kind come from the automatic 'metavar' we get from argparse,
the uppercase version of the flag name.
The latter are where we manually specified metavar as the flag name.
After:
--build_dir DIR
--make_options X=Y
--kunitconfig PATH
--kconfig_add CONFIG_X=Y
--arch ARCH
--cross_compile PREFIX
--qemu_config FILE
--jobs N
--timeout SECONDS
--raw_output [{all,kunit}]
--json [FILE]
This patch tries to make the code more clear by specifying the _type_ of
input we expect, e.g. --build_dir is a DIR, --qemu_config is a FILE.
I also switched it to uppercase since it looked more clearly like
placeholder text that way.
This patch also changes --raw_output to specify `choices` to make it
more clear what the options are, and this way argparse can validate it
for us, as shown by the added test case.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Before, kunit.py always printed "arch": "UM" in its json output, but...
1. With `kunit.py parse`, we could be parsing output from anywhere, so
we can't say that.
2. Capitalizing it is probably wrong, as it's `ARCH=um`
3. Commit 87c9c16317 ("kunit: tool: add support for QEMU") made it so
kunit.py could knowingly run a different arch, yet we'd still always
claim "UM".
This patch addresses all of those. E.g.
1.
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py parse .kunit/test.log --json | grep -o '"arch.*' | sort -u
"arch": "",
2.
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --json | ...
"arch": "um",
3.
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --json --arch=x86_64 | ...
"arch": "x86_64",
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
When using --json, kunit.py run/exec/parse will produce results in
KernelCI json format.
As part of that, we include the build_dir that was used, and we
(incorrectly) hardcode in the arch, etc.
We'll want a way to plumb more values (as well as the correct `arch`),
so this patch groups those fields into kunit_json.Metadata type.
This patch should have no user visible changes.
And since we only used build_dir in KunitParseRequest for json, we can
now move it out of that struct and add it into KunitExecRequest, which
needs it and used to get it via inheritance.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Commit be886ba90c ("kunit: run kunit_tool from any directory")
introduced this variable, but it was unused even in that commit.
Since it's still unused now and callers can instead use
get_kernel_root_path(), delete this var.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Currently kunit_json.get_json_result() will output the JSON-ified test
output to json_path, but iff it's not "stdout".
Instead, move the responsibility entirely over to the one caller.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
This field is only used to pass along the parsed Test object from
parse_tests().
Everywhere else the `result` field is ignored.
Instead make parse_tests() explicitly return a KunitResult and Test so
we can retire the `result` field.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
The --jobs parameter for kunit_tool currently defaults to 8 CPUs,
regardless of the number available. For systems with significantly more
(or less), this is not as efficient. Instead, default --jobs to the
number of CPUs available to the process: while there are as many
superstitions as to exactly what the ideal jobs:CPU ratio is, this seems
sufficiently sensible to me.
A new helper function to get the default number of jobs is added:
get_default_jobs() -- this is used in kunit_tool_test instead of a
hardcoded value, or an explicit call to len(os.sched_getaffinity()), so
should be more flexible if this needs to change in the future.
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
If I created a kunitconfig file that was incomplete, then
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py build --kunitconfig=my_kunitconfig
would silently drop all the options with unmet dependencies!
This is because it doesn't do the config check that `kunit.py config`
does.
So if I want to safely build a kernel for testing, I have to do
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py config <flags>
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py build <flags, again>
It seems unlikely that any user of kunit.py would want the current
`build` semantics.
So make it effectively do `kunit.py config` + `kunit.py build`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
The `log` field is unused, and the `status` field is accessible via
`test.status`.
So it's simpler to just return the main `Test` object directly.
And since we're no longer returning a namedtuple, which has no type
annotations, this hopefully means typecheckers are better equipped to
find any errors.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
namedtuple is a terse way of defining a collection of fields.
However, it does not allow us to annotate the type of these fields.
It also doesn't let us have any sort of inheritance between types.
Since commit df4b0807ca ("kunit: tool: Assert the version
requirement"), kunit.py has asserted that it's running on python >=3.7.
So in that case use a 3.7 feature, dataclasses, to replace these.
Changes in detail:
* Make KunitExecRequest contain all the fields needed for exec_tests
* Use inheritance to dedupe fields
* also allows us to e.g. pass a KUnitRequest in as a KUnitParseRequest
* this has changed around the order of some fields
* Use named arguments when constructing all request objects in kunit.py
* This is to prevent accidentally mixing up fields, etc.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
kunit.py isn't very clear that
1) it stashes a copy of the unparsed output in $BUILD_DIR/test.log
2) it sets $BUILD_DIR=.kunit by default
So it's trickier than it should be for a user to come up with the right
command to do so.
Make kunit.py print out a command for this if
a) we saw a test case crash
b) we only ran one kernel (test.log only contains output from the last)
Example suggested command:
$ scripts/decode_stacktrace.sh .kunit/vmlinux .kunit < .kunit/test.log | tee .kunit/decoded.log | ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py parse
Without debug info a user might see something like
[14:11:25] Call Trace:
[14:11:25] ? kunit_binary_assert_format (:?)
[14:11:25] kunit_try_run_case (test.c:?)
[14:11:25] ? __kthread_parkme (kthread.c:?)
[14:11:25] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter (try-catch.c:?)
[14:11:25] ? kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter (try-catch.c:?)
[14:11:25] kthread (kthread.c:?)
[14:11:25] new_thread_handler (:?)
[14:11:25] [CRASHED]
`tee` is in GNU coreutils, so it seems fine to add that into the
pipeline by default, that way users can inspect the otuput in more
detail.
Note: to turn on debug info, users would need to do something like
$ echo -e 'CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=y\nCONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=y' >> .kunit/.kunitconfig
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py config
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py build
$ <then run decode_stacktrace.sh now vmlinux is updated>
This feels too clunky to include in the instructions.
With --kconfig_add [1], it would become a bit less painful.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20211106013058.2621799-2-dlatypov@google.com/
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
E.g. run tests but with KASAN
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch=x86_64 --kconfig_add=CONFIG_KASAN=y
This also works with --kunitconfig
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch=x86_64 --kunitconfig=fs/ext4 --kconfig_add=CONFIG_KASAN=y
This flag is inspired by TuxMake's --kconfig-add, see
https://gitlab.com/Linaro/tuxmake#examples.
Our version just uses "_" as the delimiter for consistency with
pre-existing flags like --build_dir, --make_options, --kernel_args, etc.
Note: this does make it easier to run into a pre-existing edge case:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch=x86_64 --kconfig_add=CONFIG_KASAN=y
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch=x86_64
This second invocation ^ still has KASAN enabled!
kunit.py won't call olddefconfig if our current .config is already a
superset of the provided kunitconfig.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
kunit.py currently crashes and fails to parse kernel output if it's not
fully valid utf-8.
This can come from memory corruption or just inadvertently printing
out binary data as strings.
E.g. adding this line into a kunit test
pr_info("\x80")
will cause this exception
UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0x80 in position
1961: invalid start byte
We can tell Python how to handle errors, see
https://docs.python.org/3/library/codecs.html#error-handlers
Unfortunately, it doesn't seem like there's a way to specify this in
just one location, so we need to repeat ourselves quite a bit.
Specify `errors='backslashreplace'` so we instead:
* print out the offending byte as '\x80'
* try and continue parsing the output.
* as long as the TAP lines themselves are valid, we're fine.
Fixed spelling/grammar in commit log:
Shuah Khan <<skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Update to kunit_parser to improve compatibility with KTAP
specification including arbitrarily nested tests. Patch accomplishes
three major changes:
- Use a general Test object to represent all tests rather than TestCase
and TestSuite objects. This allows for easier implementation of arbitrary
levels of nested tests and promotes the idea that both test suites and test
cases are tests.
- Print errors incrementally rather than all at once after the
parsing finishes to maximize information given to the user in the
case of the parser given invalid input and to increase the helpfulness
of the timestamps given during printing. Note that kunit.py parse does
not print incrementally yet. However, this fix brings us closer to
this feature.
- Increase compatibility for different formats of input. Arbitrary levels
of nested tests supported. Also, test cases and test suites are now
supported to be present on the same level of testing.
This patch now implements the draft KTAP specification here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/CA+GJov6tdjvY9x12JsJT14qn6c7NViJxqaJk+r-K1YJzPggFDQ@mail.gmail.com/
We'll update the parser as the spec evolves.
This patch adjusts the kunit_tool_test.py file to check for
the correct outputs from the new parser and adds a new test to check
the parsing for a KTAP result log with correct format for multiple nested
subtests (test_is_test_passed-all_passed_nested.log).
This patch also alters the kunit_json.py file to allow for arbitrarily
nested tests.
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
The new --run_isolated flag makes the tool boot the kernel once per
suite or test, preventing leftover state from one suite to impact the
other. This can be useful as a starting point to debugging test
hermeticity issues.
Note: it takes a lot longer, so people should not use it normally.
Consider the following very simplified example:
bool disable_something_for_test = false;
void function_being_tested() {
...
if (disable_something_for_test) return;
...
}
static void test_before(struct kunit *test)
{
disable_something_for_test = true;
function_being_tested();
/* oops, we forgot to reset it back to false */
}
static void test_after(struct kunit *test)
{
/* oops, now "fixing" test_before can cause test_after to fail! */
function_being_tested();
}
Presented like this, the issues are obvious, but it gets a lot more
complicated to track down as the amount of test setup and helper
functions increases.
Another use case is memory corruption. It might not be surfaced as a
failure/crash in the test case or suite that caused it. I've noticed in
kunit's own unit tests, the 3rd suite after might be the one to finally
crash after an out-of-bounds write, for example.
Example usage:
Per suite:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
....
Testing complete. 5 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit-try-catch-test ========
...
Per test:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=test
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] parse_filter_test
============================================================
Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] filter_subsuite_test
...
It works with filters as well:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite example
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/1)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] example ========
...
It also handles test filters, '*.*skip*' runs these 3 tests:
kunit_status.kunit_status_mark_skipped_test
example.example_skip_test
example.example_mark_skipped_test
Fixed up merge conflict between:
d8c23ead70 ("kunit: tool: better handling of quasi-bool args (--json, --raw_output)") and
6710951ee039 ("kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately")
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
This is a long standing bug in kunit tool.
Since these files were added, run_kernel() has always yielded lines.
That means, the call to run_kernel() returns before the kernel finishes
executing tests, potentially before a single line of output is even
produced.
So code like this
time_start = time.time()
result = linux.run_kernel(...)
time_end = time.time()
would only measure the time taken for python to give back the generator
object.
From a caller's perspective, the only way to know the kernel has exited
is for us to consume all the output from the `result` generator object.
Alternatively, we could change run_kernel() to try and do its own book
keeping and return the total time, but that doesn't seem worth it.
This change makes us record `time_end` after we're done parsing all the
output (which should mean we've consumed all of it, or errored out).
That means we're including in the parsing time as well, but that should
be quite small, and it's better than claiming it took 0s to run tests.
Let's use this as an example:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit example
Before:
Elapsed time: 7.684s total, 0.001s configuring, 4.692s building, 0.000s running
After:
Elapsed time: 6.283s total, 0.001s configuring, 3.202s building, 3.079s running
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Currently this code is copy-pasted between the normal "run" subcommand
and the "exec" subcommand.
Given we don't have any interest in just executing the tests without
giving the user any indication what happened (i.e. parsing the output),
make a function that does both this things and can be reused.
This will be useful when we allow more complicated ways of running
tests, e.g. invoking the kernel multiple times instead of just once,
etc.
We remove input_data from the ParseRequest so the callers don't have to
pass in a dummy value for this field. Named tuples are also immutable,
so if they did pass in a dummy, exec_tests() would need to make a copy
to call parse_tests().
Removing it also makes KunitParseRequest match the other *Request types,
as they only contain user arguments/flags, not data.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Drop some variables in unit tests that were unused and/or add assertions
based on them.
For ExitStack, it was imported, but the `es` variable wasn't used so it
didn't do anything, and we were leaking the file objects.
Refactor it to just use nested `with` statements to properly close them.
And drop the direct use of .close() on file objects in the kunit tool
unit test, as these can be leaked if test assertions fail.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Commit 1d71307a6f ("kunit: add unit test for filtering suites by
names") introduced the ability to filter which suites we run via glob.
This change extends it so we can also filter individual test cases
inside of suites as well.
This is quite useful when, e.g.
* trying to run just the tests cases you've just added or are working on
* trying to debug issues with test hermeticity
Examples:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit '*exec*.parse*'
...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] parse_filter_test
============================================================
Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit '*.no_matching_tests'
...
[ERROR] no tests run!
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Problem:
What does this do?
$ kunit.py run --json
Well, it runs all the tests and prints test results out as JSON.
And next is
$ kunit.py run my-test-suite --json
This runs just `my-test-suite` and prints results out as JSON.
But what about?
$ kunit.py run --json my-test-suite
This runs all the tests and stores the json results in a "my-test-suite"
file.
Why:
--json, and now --raw_output are actually string flags. They just have a
default value. --json in particular takes the name of an output file.
It was intended that you'd do
$ kunit.py run --json=my_output_file my-test-suite
if you ever wanted to specify the value.
Workaround:
It doesn't seem like there's a way to make
https://docs.python.org/3/library/argparse.html only accept arg values
after a '='.
I believe that `--json` should "just work" regardless of where it is.
So this patch automatically rewrites a bare `--json` to `--json=stdout`.
That makes the examples above work the same way.
Add a regression test that can catch this for --raw_output.
Fixes: 6a499c9c42 ("kunit: tool: make --raw_output support only showing kunit output")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
--raw_output is nice, but it would be nicer if could show only output
after KUnit tests have started.
So change the flag to allow specifying a string ('kunit').
Make it so `--raw_output` alone will default to `--raw_output=all` and
have the same original behavior.
Drop the small kunit_parser.raw_output() function since it feels wrong
to put it in "kunit_parser.py" when the point of it is to not parse
anything.
E.g.
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --raw_output=kunit
...
[15:24:07] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
TAP version 14
1..1
# Subtest: example
1..3
# example_simple_test: initializing
ok 1 - example_simple_test
# example_skip_test: initializing
# example_skip_test: You should not see a line below.
ok 2 - example_skip_test # SKIP this test should be skipped
# example_mark_skipped_test: initializing
# example_mark_skipped_test: You should see a line below.
# example_mark_skipped_test: You should see this line.
ok 3 - example_mark_skipped_test # SKIP this test should be skipped
ok 1 - example
[15:24:10] Elapsed time: 6.487s total, 0.001s configuring, 3.510s building, 0.000s running
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
kunit.py currently does not make it possible for users to specify module
parameters (/kernel arguments more generally) unless one directly tweaks
the kunit.py code itself.
This hasn't mattered much so far, but this would make it easier to port
existing tests that expose module parameters over to KUnit and/or let
current KUnit tests take advantage of them.
Tested using an kunit internal parameter:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit \
--kernel_args=kunit.filter_glob=kunit_status
...
Testing complete. 2 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Commit 87c9c16317 ("kunit: tool: add support for QEMU") on the 'next'
tree adds 'from __future__ import annotations' in 'kunit_kernel.py'.
Because it is supported on only >=3.7 Python, people using older Python
will get below error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py", line 20, in <module>
import kunit_kernel
File "/home/sjpark/linux/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py", line 9
from __future__ import annotations
^
SyntaxError: future feature annotations is not defined
This commit adds a version assertion in 'kunit.py', so that people get
more explicit error message like below:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py", line 15, in <module>
assert sys.version_info >= (3, 7), "Python version is too old"
AssertionError: Python version is too old
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.de>
Acked-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
