KUnit's executor_test logs the filter string in KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(),
but passed a random character from the filter, rather than the whole
string.
This was found by annotating KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG() to let gcc validate
the format string.
Fixes: 76066f93f1 ("kunit: add tests for filtering attributes")
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Reviewed-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Commit d393acce7b ("drm/tests: Switch to kunit devices") switched the
DRM device creation helpers from an ad-hoc implementation to the new
kunit device creation helpers introduced in commit d03c720e03 ("kunit:
Add APIs for managing devices").
However, while the DRM helpers were using a platform_device, the kunit
helpers are using a dedicated bus and device type.
That situation creates small differences in the initialisation, and one
of them is that the kunit devices do not have the DMA masks setup. In
turn, this means that we can't do any kind of DMA buffer allocation
anymore, which creates a regression on some (downstream for now) tests.
Let's set up a default DMA mask that should work on any platform to fix
it.
Fixes: d03c720e03 ("kunit: Add APIs for managing devices")
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Since commit d492cc2573 ("driver core: device.h: make struct
bus_type a const *"), the driver core can properly handle constant
struct bus_type, move the kunit_bus_type variable to be a constant
structure as well, placing it into read-only memory which can not be
modified at runtime.
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Suggested-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ricardo B. Marliere <ricardo@marliere.net>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
By allowing the filter_glob parameter to be written to, it's possible to
tweak the testsuites that will be executed on new module loads. This
makes it easier to run specific tests without having to reload kunit and
provides a way to filter tests on real HW even if kunit is builtin.
Example for xe driver:
1) Run just 1 test
# echo -n xe_bo > /sys/module/kunit/parameters/filter_glob
# modprobe -r xe_live_test
# modprobe xe_live_test
# ls /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/
xe_bo
2) Run all tests
# echo \* > /sys/module/kunit/parameters/filter_glob
# modprobe -r xe_live_test
# modprobe xe_live_test
# ls /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/
xe_bo xe_dma_buf xe_migrate xe_mocs
For completeness and to cover other use cases, also change filter and
filter_action to rw.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/intel-xe/dzacvbdditbneiu3e3fmstjmttcbne44yspumpkd6sjn56jqpk@vxu7sksbqrp6/
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
If KUnit is built as a module, and it's unloaded, the kunit_bus is not
unregistered. This causes an error if it's then re-loaded later, as we
try to re-register the bus.
Unregister the bus and root_device on shutdown, if it looks valid.
In addition, be more specific about the value of kunit_bus_device. It
is:
- a valid struct device* if the kunit_bus initialised correctly.
- an ERR_PTR if it failed to initialise.
- NULL before initialisation and after shutdown.
Fixes: d03c720e03 ("kunit: Add APIs for managing devices")
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Commit 2810c1e998 ("kunit: Fix wild-memory-access bug in
kunit_free_suite_set()") fixed a wild-memory-access bug that could have
happened during the loading phase of test suites built and executed as
loadable modules. However, it also introduced a problematic side effect
that causes test suites modules to crash when they attempt to register
fake devices.
When a module is loaded, it traverses the MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED and
MODULE_STATE_COMING states before reaching the normal operating state
MODULE_STATE_LIVE. Finally, when the module is removed, it moves to
MODULE_STATE_GOING before being released. However, if the loading
function load_module() fails between complete_formation() and
do_init_module(), the module goes directly from MODULE_STATE_COMING to
MODULE_STATE_GOING without passing through MODULE_STATE_LIVE.
This behavior was causing kunit_module_exit() to be called without
having first executed kunit_module_init(). Since kunit_module_exit() is
responsible for freeing the memory allocated by kunit_module_init()
through kunit_filter_suites(), this behavior was resulting in a
wild-memory-access bug.
Commit 2810c1e998 ("kunit: Fix wild-memory-access bug in
kunit_free_suite_set()") fixed this issue by running the tests when the
module is still in MODULE_STATE_COMING. However, modules in that state
are not fully initialized, lacking sysfs kobjects. Therefore, if a test
module attempts to register a fake device, it will inevitably crash.
This patch proposes a different approach to fix the original
wild-memory-access bug while restoring the normal module execution flow
by making kunit_module_exit() able to detect if kunit_module_init() has
previously initialized the tests suite set. In this way, test modules
can once again register fake devices without crashing.
This behavior is achieved by checking whether mod->kunit_suites is a
virtual or direct mapping address. If it is a virtual address, then
kunit_module_init() has allocated the suite_set in kunit_filter_suites()
using kmalloc_array(). On the contrary, if mod->kunit_suites is still
pointing to the original address that was set when looking up the
.kunit_test_suites section of the module, then the loading phase has
failed and there's no memory to be freed.
v4:
- rebased on 6.8
- noted that kunit_filter_suites() must return a virtual address
v3:
- add a comment to clarify why the start address is checked
v2:
- add include <linux/mm.h>
Fixes: 2810c1e998 ("kunit: Fix wild-memory-access bug in kunit_free_suite_set()")
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Tested-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Tested-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marco Pagani <marpagan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
The kunit_device_register() function doesn't return NULL, it returns
error pointers. Change the KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL() to check for
ERR_OR_NULL().
Fixes: d03c720e03 ("kunit: Add APIs for managing devices")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
The KUnit device helpers are documented with kerneldoc in their header
file, but also have short comments over their implementation. These were
mistakenly formatted as kerneldoc comments, even though they're not
valid kerneldoc. It shouldn't cause any serious problems -- this file
isn't included in the docs -- but it could be confusing, and causes
warnings.
Remove the extra '*' so that these aren't treated as kerneldoc.
Fixes: d03c720e03 ("kunit: Add APIs for managing devices")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312181920.H4EPAH20-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Adds a variant of example_static_stub_test() that shows use of a
pointer-to-function with kunit_activate_static_stub().
A const pointer to the add_one() function is declared. This
pointer-to-function is passed to kunit_activate_static_stub() and
kunit_deactivate_static_stub() instead of passing add_one directly.
Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
suite->log must be checked for NULL before passing it to
string_stream_clear(). This was done in kunit_init_test() but was missing
from kunit_init_suite().
Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Fixes: 6d696c4695c5 ("kunit: add ability to run tests after boot using debugfs")
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Acked-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
If we run parameterized test that uses test->priv to prepare some
custom data, then value of test->priv will leak to the next param
iteration and may be unexpected. This could be easily seen if
we promote example_priv_test to parameterized test as then only
first test iteration will be successful:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run \
--kunitconfig ./lib/kunit/.kunitconfig *.example_priv*
[ ] Starting KUnit Kernel (1/1)...
[ ] ============================================================
[ ] =================== example (1 subtest) ====================
[ ] ==================== example_priv_test ====================
[ ] [PASSED] example value 3
[ ] # example_priv_test: initializing
[ ] # example_priv_test: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c:230
[ ] Expected test->priv == ((void *)0), but
[ ] test->priv == 0000000060dfe290
[ ] ((void *)0) == 0000000000000000
[ ] # example_priv_test: cleaning up
[ ] [FAILED] example value 2
[ ] # example_priv_test: initializing
[ ] # example_priv_test: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c:230
[ ] Expected test->priv == ((void *)0), but
[ ] test->priv == 0000000060dfe290
[ ] ((void *)0) == 0000000000000000
[ ] # example_priv_test: cleaning up
[ ] [FAILED] example value 1
[ ] # example_priv_test: initializing
[ ] # example_priv_test: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c:230
[ ] Expected test->priv == ((void *)0), but
[ ] test->priv == 0000000060dfe290
[ ] ((void *)0) == 0000000000000000
[ ] # example_priv_test: cleaning up
[ ] [FAILED] example value 0
[ ] # example_priv_test: initializing
[ ] # example_priv_test: cleaning up
[ ] # example_priv_test: pass:1 fail:3 skip:0 total:4
[ ] ================ [FAILED] example_priv_test ================
[ ] # example: initializing suite
[ ] # module: kunit_example_test
[ ] # example: exiting suite
[ ] # Totals: pass:1 fail:3 skip:0 total:4
[ ] ===================== [FAILED] example =====================
Fix that by resetting test->priv after each param iteration, in
similar way what we did for the test->status.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cc: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Tests for drivers often require a struct device to pass to other
functions. While it's possible to create these with
root_device_register(), or to use something like a platform device, this
is both a misuse of those APIs, and can be difficult to clean up after,
for example, a failed assertion.
Add some KUnit-specific functions for registering and unregistering a
struct device:
- kunit_device_register()
- kunit_device_register_with_driver()
- kunit_device_unregister()
These helpers allocate a on a 'kunit' bus which will either probe the
driver passed in (kunit_device_register_with_driver), or will create a
stub driver (kunit_device_register) which is cleaned up on test shutdown.
Devices are automatically unregistered on test shutdown, but can be
manually unregistered earlier with kunit_device_unregister() in order
to, for example, test device release code.
Reviewed-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Add functionality to run built-in tests after boot by writing to a
debugfs file.
Add a new debugfs file labeled "run" for each test suite to use for
this purpose.
As an example, write to the file using the following:
echo "any string" > /sys/kernel/debugfs/kunit/<testsuite>/run
This will trigger the test suite to run and will print results to the
kernel log.
To guard against running tests concurrently with this feature, add a
mutex lock around running kunit. This supports the current practice of
not allowing tests to be run concurrently on the same kernel.
This new functionality could be used to design a parameter
injection feature in the future.
Fixed up merge conflict duing rebase to Linux 6.7-rc6
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Add is_init test attribute of type bool. Add to_string, get, and filter
methods to lib/kunit/attributes.c.
Mark each of the tests in the init section with the is_init=true attribute.
Add is_init to the attributes documentation.
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Add example_init_test_suite to allow for testing the feature of running
test suites marked as init to indicate they use init data and/or
functions.
This suite should always pass and uses a simple init function.
This suite can also be used to test the is_init attribute introduced in
the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Add KUNIT_INIT_TABLE to the INIT_DATA linker section.
Alter the KUnit macros to create init tests:
kunit_test_init_section_suites
Update lib/kunit/executor.c to run both the suites in KUNIT_TABLE and
KUNIT_INIT_TABLE.
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
In kunit_debugfs_create_suite() give up and skip creating the debugfs
file if any of the alloc_string_stream() calls return an error or NULL.
Only put a value in the log pointer of kunit_suite and kunit_test if it
is a valid pointer to a log.
This prevents the potential invalid dereference reported by smatch:
lib/kunit/debugfs.c:115 kunit_debugfs_create_suite() error: 'suite->log'
dereferencing possible ERR_PTR()
lib/kunit/debugfs.c:119 kunit_debugfs_create_suite() error: 'test_case->log'
dereferencing possible ERR_PTR()
Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Fixes: 05e2006ce4 ("kunit: Use string_stream for test log")
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Move the call to kunit_suite_has_succeeded() after the check that
the kunit_suite pointer is valid.
This was found by smatch:
lib/kunit/debugfs.c:66 debugfs_print_results() warn: variable
dereferenced before check 'suite' (see line 63)
Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Fixes: 38289a26e1 ("kunit: fix debugfs code to use enum kunit_status, not bool")
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Check the stream pointer passed to string_stream_destroy() for
IS_ERR_OR_NULL() instead of only NULL.
Whatever alloc_string_stream() returns should be safe to pass
to string_stream_destroy(), and that will be an ERR_PTR.
It's obviously good practise and generally helpful to also check
for NULL pointers so that client cleanup code can call
string_stream_destroy() unconditionally - which could include
pointers that have never been set to anything and so are NULL.
Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Passing a gfp_t to KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ() causes a cast warning:
lib/kunit/string-stream-test.c:73:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in
initializer (different base types) expected long long right_value
got restricted gfp_t const __right
Avoid this by testing stream->gfp for the expected value and passing the
boolean result of this comparison to KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(), as was already
done a few lines above in string_stream_managed_init_test().
Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Fixes: d1a0d699bf ("kunit: string-stream: Add tests for freeing resource-managed string_stream")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311181918.0mpCu2Xh-lkp@intel.com/
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
KUnit's deferred action API accepts a void(*)(void *) function pointer
which is called when the test is exited. However, we very frequently
want to use existing functions which accept a single pointer, but which
may not be of type void*. While this is probably dodgy enough to be on
the wrong side of the C standard, it's been often used for similar
callbacks, and gcc's -Wcast-function-type seems to ignore cases where
the only difference is the type of the argument, assuming it's
compatible (i.e., they're both pointers to data).
However, clang 16 has introduced -Wcast-function-type-strict, which no
longer permits any deviation in function pointer type. This seems to be
because it'd break CFI, which validates the type of function calls.
This rather ruins our attempts to cast functions to defer them, and
leaves us with a few options. The one we've chosen is to implement a
macro which will generate a wrapper function which accepts a void*, and
casts the argument to the appropriate type.
For example, if you were trying to wrap:
void foo_close(struct foo *handle);
you could use:
KUNIT_DEFINE_ACTION_WRAPPER(kunit_action_foo_close,
foo_close,
struct foo *);
This would create a new kunit_action_foo_close() function, of type
kunit_action_t, which could be passed into kunit_add_action() and
similar functions.
In addition to defining this macro, update KUnit and its tests to use
it.
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1750
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
In kunit_log_test() pass the kfree_wrapper() function to kunit_add_action()
instead of directly passing kfree().
This prevents a cast warning:
lib/kunit/kunit-test.c:565:25: warning: cast from 'void (*)(const void *)'
to 'kunit_action_t *' (aka 'void (*)(void *)') converts to incompatible
function type [-Wcast-function-type-strict]
564 full_log = string_stream_get_string(test->log);
> 565 kunit_add_action(test, (kunit_action_t *)kfree, full_log);
Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311070041.kWVYx7YP-lkp@intel.com/
Fixes: 05e2006ce4 ("kunit: Use string_stream for test log")
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Today we reset the suite counter as part of the suite cleanup,
called from the module exit callback, but it might not work that
well as one can try to collect results without unloading a previous
test (either unintentionally or due to dependencies).
For easy reproduction try to load the kunit-test.ko and then
collect and parse results from the kunit-example-test.ko load.
Parser will complain about mismatch of expected test number:
[ ] KTAP version 1
[ ] 1..1
[ ] # example: initializing suite
[ ] KTAP version 1
[ ] # Subtest: example
..
[ ] # example: pass:5 fail:0 skip:4 total:9
[ ] # Totals: pass:6 fail:0 skip:6 total:12
[ ] ok 7 example
[ ] [ERROR] Test: example: Expected test number 1 but found 7
[ ] ===================== [PASSED] example =====================
[ ] ============================================================
[ ] Testing complete. Ran 12 tests: passed: 6, skipped: 6, errors: 1
Since we are now printing suite test plan on every module load,
right before running suite tests, we should make sure that suite
counter will also start from 1. Easiest solution seems to be move
counter reset to the __kunit_test_suites_init() function.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cc: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
