We're missing the `f` prefix to have python do string interpolation, so
we'd never end up printing what the actual "unexpected" error is.
Fixes: ee92ed3836 ("kunit: add run_checks.py script to validate kunit changes")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Python 3.10.0 contains:
9e09849d20 ("bpo-41006: importlib.util no longer imports typing (GH-20938)")
It causes importlib.util to no longer import importlib.abs, which leads
to the following error when trying to use kunit with qemu:
AttributeError: module 'importlib' has no attribute 'abc'. Did you mean: '_abc'?
Add the missing import.
Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
The --jobs parameter for kunit_tool currently defaults to 8 CPUs,
regardless of the number available. For systems with significantly more
(or less), this is not as efficient. Instead, default --jobs to the
number of CPUs available to the process: while there are as many
superstitions as to exactly what the ideal jobs:CPU ratio is, this seems
sufficiently sensible to me.
A new helper function to get the default number of jobs is added:
get_default_jobs() -- this is used in kunit_tool_test instead of a
hardcoded value, or an explicit call to len(os.sched_getaffinity()), so
should be more flexible if this needs to change in the future.
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
After upgrading mypy and pytype from pip, we see 2 new errors when
running ./tools/testing/kunit/run_checks.py.
Error #1: mypy and pytype
They now deduce that importlib.util.spec_from_file_location() can return
None and note that we're not checking for this.
We validate that the arch is valid (i.e. the file exists) beforehand.
Add in an `asssert spec is not None` to appease the checkers.
Error #2: pytype bug https://github.com/google/pytype/issues/1057
It doesn't like `from datetime import datetime`, specifically that a
type shares a name with a module.
We can workaround this by either
* renaming the import or just using `import datetime`
* passing the new `--fix-module-collisions` flag to pytype.
We pick the first option for now because
* the flag is quite new, only in the 2021.11.29 release.
* I'd prefer if people can just run `pytype <file>`
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
If I created a kunitconfig file that was incomplete, then
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py build --kunitconfig=my_kunitconfig
would silently drop all the options with unmet dependencies!
This is because it doesn't do the config check that `kunit.py config`
does.
So if I want to safely build a kernel for testing, I have to do
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py config <flags>
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py build <flags, again>
It seems unlikely that any user of kunit.py would want the current
`build` semantics.
So make it effectively do `kunit.py config` + `kunit.py build`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
The `log` field is unused, and the `status` field is accessible via
`test.status`.
So it's simpler to just return the main `Test` object directly.
And since we're no longer returning a namedtuple, which has no type
annotations, this hopefully means typecheckers are better equipped to
find any errors.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
namedtuple is a terse way of defining a collection of fields.
However, it does not allow us to annotate the type of these fields.
It also doesn't let us have any sort of inheritance between types.
Since commit df4b0807ca ("kunit: tool: Assert the version
requirement"), kunit.py has asserted that it's running on python >=3.7.
So in that case use a 3.7 feature, dataclasses, to replace these.
Changes in detail:
* Make KunitExecRequest contain all the fields needed for exec_tests
* Use inheritance to dedupe fields
* also allows us to e.g. pass a KUnitRequest in as a KUnitParseRequest
* this has changed around the order of some fields
* Use named arguments when constructing all request objects in kunit.py
* This is to prevent accidentally mixing up fields, etc.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
kunit.py isn't very clear that
1) it stashes a copy of the unparsed output in $BUILD_DIR/test.log
2) it sets $BUILD_DIR=.kunit by default
So it's trickier than it should be for a user to come up with the right
command to do so.
Make kunit.py print out a command for this if
a) we saw a test case crash
b) we only ran one kernel (test.log only contains output from the last)
Example suggested command:
$ scripts/decode_stacktrace.sh .kunit/vmlinux .kunit < .kunit/test.log | tee .kunit/decoded.log | ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py parse
Without debug info a user might see something like
[14:11:25] Call Trace:
[14:11:25] ? kunit_binary_assert_format (:?)
[14:11:25] kunit_try_run_case (test.c:?)
[14:11:25] ? __kthread_parkme (kthread.c:?)
[14:11:25] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter (try-catch.c:?)
[14:11:25] ? kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter (try-catch.c:?)
[14:11:25] kthread (kthread.c:?)
[14:11:25] new_thread_handler (:?)
[14:11:25] [CRASHED]
`tee` is in GNU coreutils, so it seems fine to add that into the
pipeline by default, that way users can inspect the otuput in more
detail.
Note: to turn on debug info, users would need to do something like
$ echo -e 'CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=y\nCONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=y' >> .kunit/.kunitconfig
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py config
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py build
$ <then run decode_stacktrace.sh now vmlinux is updated>
This feels too clunky to include in the instructions.
With --kconfig_add [1], it would become a bit less painful.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20211106013058.2621799-2-dlatypov@google.com/
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Problem: currently, if you remove something from your kunitconfig,
kunit.py will not regenerate the .config file.
The same thing happens if you did --kunitconfig_add=CONFIG_KASAN=y [1]
and then ran again without it. Your new run will still have KASAN.
The reason is that kunit.py won't regenerate the .config file if it's a
superset of the kunitconfig. This speeds it up a bit for iterating.
This patch adds an additional check that forces kunit.py to regenerate
the .config file if the current kunitconfig doesn't match the previous
one.
What this means:
* deleting entries from .kunitconfig works as one would expect
* dropping a --kunitconfig_add also triggers a rebuild
* you can still edit .config directly to turn on new options
We implement this by creating a `last_used_kunitconfig` file in the
build directory (so .kunit, by default) after we generate the .config.
When comparing the kconfigs, we compare python sets, so duplicates and
permutations don't trip us up.
The majority of this patch is adding unit tests for the existing logic
and for the new case where `last_used_kunitconfig` differs.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20211106013058.2621799-2-dlatypov@google.com/
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
The current error message is precise, but not very clear if you don't
already know what it's talking about, e.g.
> $ make ARCH=um olddefconfig O=.kunit
> ERROR:root:Provided Kconfig is not contained in validated .config. Following fields found in kunitconfig, but not in .config: CONFIG_DRM=y
Try to reword the error message so that it's
* your missing options usually have unsatisified dependencies
* if you're on UML, that might be the cause (it is, in this example)
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
E.g. run tests but with KASAN
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch=x86_64 --kconfig_add=CONFIG_KASAN=y
This also works with --kunitconfig
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch=x86_64 --kunitconfig=fs/ext4 --kconfig_add=CONFIG_KASAN=y
This flag is inspired by TuxMake's --kconfig-add, see
https://gitlab.com/Linaro/tuxmake#examples.
Our version just uses "_" as the delimiter for consistency with
pre-existing flags like --build_dir, --make_options, --kernel_args, etc.
Note: this does make it easier to run into a pre-existing edge case:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch=x86_64 --kconfig_add=CONFIG_KASAN=y
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch=x86_64
This second invocation ^ still has KASAN enabled!
kunit.py won't call olddefconfig if our current .config is already a
superset of the provided kunitconfig.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
read_from_file() clears its `self` Kconfig object and parses a config
file.
It is a way to construct Kconfig objects more so than an operation on
Kconfig objects. This is reflected in the fact its only ever used as:
kconfig = kunit_config.Kconfig()
kconfig.read_from_file(path)
So clean this up and simplify callers by replacing it with
kconfig = kunit_config.parse_file(path)
Do the same thing for the related parse_from_string() function as well.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
With the parser rework [1] and run_kernel() rework [2], this allows the
parser to print out test results incrementally.
Currently, that's held up by the fact that the LineStream eagerly
pre-fetches the next line when you call pop().
This blocks parse_test_result() from returning until the line *after*
the "ok 1 - test name" line is also printed.
One can see this with the following example:
$ (echo -e 'TAP version 14\n1..3\nok 1 - fake test'; sleep 2; echo -e 'ok 2 - fake test 2'; sleep 3; echo -e 'ok 3 - fake test 3') | ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py parse
Before this patch [1]: there's a pause before 'fake test' is printed.
After this patch: 'fake test' is printed out immediately.
This patch also adds
* a unit test to verify LineStream's behavior directly
* a test case to ensure that it's lazily calling the generator
* an explicit exception for when users go beyond EOF
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20211006170049.106852-1-dlatypov@google.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20211005011340.2826268-1-dlatypov@google.com/
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
It's possible for a test to have a subtest header, but zero valid
subtests. We used to error on this if the test plan had no subtests
listed, but it's possible to have subtests without a test plan (indeed,
this is how parameterised tests work).
Tests with 0 subtests now have the result NO_TESTS, and will report an
error (which does not halt test execution, but is printed in a scary red
colour and is noted in the results summary).
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
The (K)TAP spec encourages test output to begin with a 'test plan': a
count of the number of tests being run of the form:
1..n
However, some test suites might not know the number of subtests in
advance (for example, KUnit's parameterised tests use a generator
function). In this case, it's not possible to print the test plan in
advance.
kunit_tool already parses test output which doesn't contain a plan, but
reports an error. Since we want to use nested subtests with KUnit
paramterised tests, remove this error.
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
This formalizes the checks KUnit maintainers have been running (or in
other cases: forgetting to run).
This script also runs them all in parallel to minimize friction (pytype
can be fairly slow, but not slower than running kunit.py).
Example output:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/run_checks.py
Waiting on 4 checks (kunit_tool_test.py, kunit smoke test, pytype, mypy)...
kunit_tool_test.py: PASSED
mypy: PASSED
pytype: PASSED
kunit smoke test: PASSED
On failure or timeout (5 minutes), it'll dump out the stdout/stderr.
E.g. adding in a type-checking error:
mypy: FAILED
> kunit.py:54: error: Name 'nonexistent_function' is not defined
> Found 1 error in 1 file (checked 8 source files)
mypy and pytype are two Python type-checkers and must be installed.
This file treats them as optional and will mark them as SKIPPED if not
installed.
This tool also runs `kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit` to run
KUnit's own KUnit tests and to verify KUnit kernel code and kunit.py
play nicely together.
It uses --build_dir=kunit_run_checks so as not to clobber the default
build_dir, which helps make it faster by reducing the need to rebuild,
esp. if you're been passing in --arch instead of using UML.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Currently, KUnit will report SKIPPED tests as having failed if one uses
--json.
Add the missing if statement to set the appropriate status ("SKIP").
See https://api.kernelci.org/schema-test-case.html:
"status": {
"type": "string",
"description": "The status of the execution of this test case",
"enum": ["PASS", "FAIL", "SKIP", "ERROR"],
"default": "PASS"
},
with this, we now can properly produce all four of the statuses.
Fixes: 5acaf6031f ("kunit: tool: Support skipped tests in kunit_tool")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Currently, we have these errors:
$ mypy ./tools/testing/kunit/*.py
tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py:213: error: Item "_Loader" of "Optional[_Loader]" has no attribute "exec_module"
tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py:213: error: Item "None" of "Optional[_Loader]" has no attribute "exec_module"
tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py:214: error: Module has no attribute "QEMU_ARCH"
tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py:215: error: Module has no attribute "QEMU_ARCH"
exec_module
===========
pytype currently reports no errors, but that's because there's a comment
disabling it on 213.
This is due to https://github.com/python/typeshed/pull/2626.
The fix is to assert the loaded module implements the ABC
(abstract base class) we want which has exec_module support.
QEMU_ARCH
=========
pytype is fine with this, but mypy is not:
https://github.com/python/mypy/issues/5059
Add a check that the loaded module does indeed have QEMU_ARCH.
Note: this is not enough to appease mypy, so we also add a comment to
squash the warning.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
kunit.py currently crashes and fails to parse kernel output if it's not
fully valid utf-8.
This can come from memory corruption or just inadvertently printing
out binary data as strings.
E.g. adding this line into a kunit test
pr_info("\x80")
will cause this exception
UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0x80 in position
1961: invalid start byte
We can tell Python how to handle errors, see
https://docs.python.org/3/library/codecs.html#error-handlers
Unfortunately, it doesn't seem like there's a way to specify this in
just one location, so we need to repeat ourselves quite a bit.
Specify `errors='backslashreplace'` so we instead:
* print out the offending byte as '\x80'
* try and continue parsing the output.
* as long as the TAP lines themselves are valid, we're fine.
Fixed spelling/grammar in commit log:
Shuah Khan <<skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Update to kunit_parser to improve compatibility with KTAP
specification including arbitrarily nested tests. Patch accomplishes
three major changes:
- Use a general Test object to represent all tests rather than TestCase
and TestSuite objects. This allows for easier implementation of arbitrary
levels of nested tests and promotes the idea that both test suites and test
cases are tests.
- Print errors incrementally rather than all at once after the
parsing finishes to maximize information given to the user in the
case of the parser given invalid input and to increase the helpfulness
of the timestamps given during printing. Note that kunit.py parse does
not print incrementally yet. However, this fix brings us closer to
this feature.
- Increase compatibility for different formats of input. Arbitrary levels
of nested tests supported. Also, test cases and test suites are now
supported to be present on the same level of testing.
This patch now implements the draft KTAP specification here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/CA+GJov6tdjvY9x12JsJT14qn6c7NViJxqaJk+r-K1YJzPggFDQ@mail.gmail.com/
We'll update the parser as the spec evolves.
This patch adjusts the kunit_tool_test.py file to check for
the correct outputs from the new parser and adds a new test to check
the parsing for a KTAP result log with correct format for multiple nested
subtests (test_is_test_passed-all_passed_nested.log).
This patch also alters the kunit_json.py file to allow for arbitrarily
nested tests.
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Currently, `run_kernel()` dumps all the kernel output to a file
(.kunit/test.log) and then opens the file and yields it to callers.
This made it easier to respect the requested timeout, if any.
But it means that we can't yield the results in real time, either to the
parser or to stdout (if --raw_output is set).
This change spins up a background thread to enforce the timeout, which
allows us to yield the kernel output in real time, while also copying it
to the .kunit/test.log file.
It's also careful to ensure that the .kunit/test.log file is complete,
even in the kunit_parser throws an exception/otherwise doesn't consume
every line, see the new `finally` block and unit test.
For example:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch=x86_64 --raw_output
<configure + build steps>
...
<can now see output from QEMU in real time>
This does not currently have a visible effect when --raw_output is not
passed, as kunit_parser.py currently only outputs everything at the end.
But that could change, and this patch is a necessary step towards
showing parsed test results in real time.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
The new --run_isolated flag makes the tool boot the kernel once per
suite or test, preventing leftover state from one suite to impact the
other. This can be useful as a starting point to debugging test
hermeticity issues.
Note: it takes a lot longer, so people should not use it normally.
Consider the following very simplified example:
bool disable_something_for_test = false;
void function_being_tested() {
...
if (disable_something_for_test) return;
...
}
static void test_before(struct kunit *test)
{
disable_something_for_test = true;
function_being_tested();
/* oops, we forgot to reset it back to false */
}
static void test_after(struct kunit *test)
{
/* oops, now "fixing" test_before can cause test_after to fail! */
function_being_tested();
}
Presented like this, the issues are obvious, but it gets a lot more
complicated to track down as the amount of test setup and helper
functions increases.
Another use case is memory corruption. It might not be surfaced as a
failure/crash in the test case or suite that caused it. I've noticed in
kunit's own unit tests, the 3rd suite after might be the one to finally
crash after an out-of-bounds write, for example.
Example usage:
Per suite:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
....
Testing complete. 5 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit-try-catch-test ========
...
Per test:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=test
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] parse_filter_test
============================================================
Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] filter_subsuite_test
...
It works with filters as well:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite example
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/1)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] example ========
...
It also handles test filters, '*.*skip*' runs these 3 tests:
kunit_status.kunit_status_mark_skipped_test
example.example_skip_test
example.example_mark_skipped_test
Fixed up merge conflict between:
d8c23ead70 ("kunit: tool: better handling of quasi-bool args (--json, --raw_output)") and
6710951ee039 ("kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately")
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
This is a long standing bug in kunit tool.
Since these files were added, run_kernel() has always yielded lines.
That means, the call to run_kernel() returns before the kernel finishes
executing tests, potentially before a single line of output is even
produced.
So code like this
time_start = time.time()
result = linux.run_kernel(...)
time_end = time.time()
would only measure the time taken for python to give back the generator
object.
From a caller's perspective, the only way to know the kernel has exited
is for us to consume all the output from the `result` generator object.
Alternatively, we could change run_kernel() to try and do its own book
keeping and return the total time, but that doesn't seem worth it.
This change makes us record `time_end` after we're done parsing all the
output (which should mean we've consumed all of it, or errored out).
That means we're including in the parsing time as well, but that should
be quite small, and it's better than claiming it took 0s to run tests.
Let's use this as an example:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit example
Before:
Elapsed time: 7.684s total, 0.001s configuring, 4.692s building, 0.000s running
After:
Elapsed time: 6.283s total, 0.001s configuring, 3.202s building, 3.079s running
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Currently this code is copy-pasted between the normal "run" subcommand
and the "exec" subcommand.
Given we don't have any interest in just executing the tests without
giving the user any indication what happened (i.e. parsing the output),
make a function that does both this things and can be reused.
This will be useful when we allow more complicated ways of running
tests, e.g. invoking the kernel multiple times instead of just once,
etc.
We remove input_data from the ParseRequest so the callers don't have to
pass in a dummy value for this field. Named tuples are also immutable,
so if they did pass in a dummy, exec_tests() would need to make a copy
to call parse_tests().
Removing it also makes KunitParseRequest match the other *Request types,
as they only contain user arguments/flags, not data.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Consider this attempt to run KUnit in QEMU:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch=x86
Before you'd get this error message:
kunit_kernel.ConfigError: x86 is not a valid arch
After:
kunit_kernel.ConfigError: x86 is not a valid arch, options are ['alpha', 'arm', 'arm64', 'i386', 'powerpc', 'riscv', 's390', 'sparc', 'x86_64']
This should make it a bit easier for people to notice when they make
typos, etc. Currently, one would have to dive into the python code to
figure out what the valid set is.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
