The handling of the receive window size (rwind) from a received ACK packet
is not correct. The rxrpc_input_ackinfo() function currently checks the
current Tx window size against the rwind from the ACK to see if it has
changed, but then limits the rwind size before storing it in the tx_winsize
member and, if it increased, wake up the transmitting process. This means
that if rwind > RXRPC_RXTX_BUFF_SIZE - 1, this path will always be
followed.
Fix this by limiting rwind before we compare it to tx_winsize.
The effect of this can be seen by enabling the rxrpc_rx_rwind_change
tracepoint.
Fixes: 702f2ac87a ("rxrpc: Wake up the transmitter if Rx window size increases on the peer")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Under some circumstances, rxrpc will fail a transmit a packet through the
underlying UDP socket (ie. UDP sendmsg returns an error). This may result
in a call getting stuck.
In the instance being seen, where AFS tries to send a probe to the Volume
Location server, tracepoints show the UDP Tx failure (in this case returing
error 99 EADDRNOTAVAIL) and then nothing more:
afs_make_vl_call: c=0000015d VL.GetCapabilities
rxrpc_call: c=0000015d NWc u=1 sp=rxrpc_kernel_begin_call+0x106/0x170 [rxrpc] a=00000000dd89ee8a
rxrpc_call: c=0000015d Gus u=2 sp=rxrpc_new_client_call+0x14f/0x580 [rxrpc] a=00000000e20e4b08
rxrpc_call: c=0000015d SEE u=2 sp=rxrpc_activate_one_channel+0x7b/0x1c0 [rxrpc] a=00000000e20e4b08
rxrpc_call: c=0000015d CON u=2 sp=rxrpc_kernel_begin_call+0x106/0x170 [rxrpc] a=00000000e20e4b08
rxrpc_tx_fail: c=0000015d r=1 ret=-99 CallDataNofrag
The problem is that if the initial packet fails and the retransmission
timer hasn't been started, the call is set to completed and an error is
returned from rxrpc_send_data_packet() to rxrpc_queue_packet(). Though
rxrpc_instant_resend() is called, this does nothing because the call is
marked completed.
So rxrpc_notify_socket() isn't called and the error is passed back up to
rxrpc_send_data(), rxrpc_kernel_send_data() and thence to afs_make_call()
and afs_vl_get_capabilities() where it is simply ignored because it is
assumed that the result of a probe will be collected asynchronously.
Fileserver probing is similarly affected via afs_fs_get_capabilities().
Fix this by always issuing a notification in __rxrpc_set_call_completion()
if it shifts a call to the completed state, even if an error is also
returned to the caller through the function return value.
Also put in a little bit of optimisation to avoid taking the call
state_lock and disabling softirqs if the call is already in the completed
state and remove some now redundant rxrpc_notify_socket() calls.
Fixes: f5c17aaeb2 ("rxrpc: Calls should only have one terminal state")
Reported-by: Gerry Seidman <gerry@auristor.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
The Rx protocol has a "previousPacket" field in it that is not handled in
the same way by all protocol implementations. Sometimes it contains the
serial number of the last DATA packet received, sometimes the sequence
number of the last DATA packet received and sometimes the highest sequence
number so far received.
AF_RXRPC is using this to weed out ACKs that are out of date (it's possible
for ACK packets to get reordered on the wire), but this does not work with
OpenAFS which will just stick the sequence number of the last packet seen
into previousPacket.
The issue being seen is that big AFS FS.StoreData RPC (eg. of ~256MiB) are
timing out when partly sent. A trace was captured, with an additional
tracepoint to show ACKs being discarded in rxrpc_input_ack(). Here's an
excerpt showing the problem.
52873.203230: rxrpc_tx_data: c=000004ae DATA ed1a3584:00000002 0002449c q=00024499 fl=09
A DATA packet with sequence number 00024499 has been transmitted (the "q="
field).
...
52873.243296: rxrpc_rx_ack: c=000004ae 00012a2b DLY r=00024499 f=00024497 p=00024496 n=0
52873.243376: rxrpc_rx_ack: c=000004ae 00012a2c IDL r=0002449b f=00024499 p=00024498 n=0
52873.243383: rxrpc_rx_ack: c=000004ae 00012a2d OOS r=0002449d f=00024499 p=0002449a n=2
The Out-Of-Sequence ACK indicates that the server didn't see DATA sequence
number 00024499, but did see seq 0002449a (previousPacket, shown as "p=",
skipped the number, but firstPacket, "f=", which shows the bottom of the
window is set at that point).
52873.252663: rxrpc_retransmit: c=000004ae q=24499 a=02 xp=14581537
52873.252664: rxrpc_tx_data: c=000004ae DATA ed1a3584:00000002 000244bc q=00024499 fl=0b *RETRANS*
The packet has been retransmitted. Retransmission recurs until the peer
says it got the packet.
52873.271013: rxrpc_rx_ack: c=000004ae 00012a31 OOS r=000244a1 f=00024499 p=0002449e n=6
More OOS ACKs indicate that the other packets that are already in the
transmission pipeline are being received. The specific-ACK list is up to 6
ACKs and NAKs.
...
52873.284792: rxrpc_rx_ack: c=000004ae 00012a49 OOS r=000244b9 f=00024499 p=000244b6 n=30
52873.284802: rxrpc_retransmit: c=000004ae q=24499 a=0a xp=63505500
52873.284804: rxrpc_tx_data: c=000004ae DATA ed1a3584:00000002 000244c2 q=00024499 fl=0b *RETRANS*
52873.287468: rxrpc_rx_ack: c=000004ae 00012a4a OOS r=000244ba f=00024499 p=000244b7 n=31
52873.287478: rxrpc_rx_ack: c=000004ae 00012a4b OOS r=000244bb f=00024499 p=000244b8 n=32
At this point, the server's receive window is full (n=32) with presumably 1
NAK'd packet and 31 ACK'd packets. We can't transmit any more packets.
52873.287488: rxrpc_retransmit: c=000004ae q=24499 a=0a xp=61327980
52873.287489: rxrpc_tx_data: c=000004ae DATA ed1a3584:00000002 000244c3 q=00024499 fl=0b *RETRANS*
52873.293850: rxrpc_rx_ack: c=000004ae 00012a4c DLY r=000244bc f=000244a0 p=00024499 n=25
And now we've received an ACK indicating that a DATA retransmission was
received. 7 packets have been processed (the occupied part of the window
moved, as indicated by f= and n=).
52873.293853: rxrpc_rx_discard_ack: c=000004ae r=00012a4c 000244a0<00024499 00024499<000244b8
However, the DLY ACK gets discarded because its previousPacket has gone
backwards (from p=000244b8, in the ACK at 52873.287478 to p=00024499 in the
ACK at 52873.293850).
We then end up in a continuous cycle of retransmit/discard. kafs fails to
update its window because it's discarding the ACKs and can't transmit an
extra packet that would clear the issue because the window is full.
OpenAFS doesn't change the previousPacket value in the ACKs because no new
DATA packets are received with a different previousPacket number.
Fix this by altering the discard check to only discard an ACK based on
previousPacket if there was no advance in the firstPacket. This allows us
to transmit a new packet which will cause previousPacket to advance in the
next ACK.
The check, however, needs to allow for the possibility that previousPacket
may actually have had the serial number placed in it instead - in which
case it will go outside the window and we should ignore it.
Fixes: 1a2391c30c ("rxrpc: Fix detection of out of order acks")
Reported-by: Dave Botsch <botsch@cnf.cornell.edu>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
rxrpc currently uses a fixed 4s retransmission timeout until the RTT is
sufficiently sampled. This can cause problems with some fileservers with
calls to the cache manager in the afs filesystem being dropped from the
fileserver because a packet goes missing and the retransmission timeout is
greater than the call expiry timeout.
Fix this by:
(1) Copying the RTT/RTO calculation code from Linux's TCP implementation
and altering it to fit rxrpc.
(2) Altering the various users of the RTT to make use of the new SRTT
value.
(3) Replacing the use of rxrpc_resend_timeout to use the calculated RTO
value instead (which is needed in jiffies), along with a backoff.
Notes:
(1) rxrpc provides RTT samples by matching the serial numbers on outgoing
DATA packets that have the RXRPC_REQUEST_ACK set and PING ACK packets
against the reference serial number in incoming REQUESTED ACK and
PING-RESPONSE ACK packets.
(2) Each packet that is transmitted on an rxrpc connection gets a new
per-connection serial number, even for retransmissions, so an ACK can
be cross-referenced to a specific trigger packet. This allows RTT
information to be drawn from retransmitted DATA packets also.
(3) rxrpc maintains the RTT/RTO state on the rxrpc_peer record rather than
on an rxrpc_call because many RPC calls won't live long enough to
generate more than one sample.
(4) The calculated SRTT value is in units of 8ths of a microsecond rather
than nanoseconds.
The (S)RTT and RTO values are displayed in /proc/net/rxrpc/peers.
Fixes: 17926a7932 ([AF_RXRPC]: Provide secure RxRPC sockets for use by userspace and kernel both"")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Fix the handling of signals in client rxrpc calls made by the afs
filesystem. Ignore signals completely, leaving call abandonment or
connection loss to be detected by timeouts inside AF_RXRPC.
Allowing a filesystem call to be interrupted after the entire request has
been transmitted and an abort sent means that the server may or may not
have done the action - and we don't know. It may even be worse than that
for older servers.
Fixes: bc5e3a546d ("rxrpc: Use MSG_WAITALL to tell sendmsg() to temporarily ignore signals")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
In rxrpc_input_data(), rxrpc_notify_socket() is called if the base sequence
number of the packet is immediately following the hard-ack point at the end
of the function. However, this isn't sufficient, since the recvmsg side
may have been advancing the window and then overrun the position in which
we're adding - at which point rx_hard_ack >= seq0 and no notification is
generated.
Fix this by always generating a notification at the end of the input
function.
Without this, a long call may stall, possibly indefinitely.
Fixes: 248f219cb8 ("rxrpc: Rewrite the data and ack handling code")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
The subpacket scanning loop in rxrpc_receive_data() references the
subpacket count in the private data part of the sk_buff in the loop
termination condition. However, when the final subpacket is pasted into
the ring buffer, the function is no longer has a ref on the sk_buff and
should not be looking at sp->* any more. This point is actually marked in
the code when skb is cleared (but sp is not - which is an error).
Fix this by caching sp->nr_subpackets in a local variable and using that
instead.
Also clear 'sp' to catch accesses after that point.
This can show up as an oops in rxrpc_get_skb() if sp->nr_subpackets gets
trashed by the sk_buff getting freed and reused in the meantime.
Fixes: e2de6c4048 ("rxrpc: Use info in skbuff instead of reparsing a jumbo packet")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Move the unlock and the ping transmission for a new incoming call into
rxrpc_new_incoming_call() rather than doing it in the caller. This makes
it clearer to see what's going on.
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
There's a misplaced traceline in rxrpc_input_packet() which is looking at a
packet that just got released rather than the replacement packet.
Fix this by moving the traceline after the assignment that moves the new
packet pointer to the actual packet pointer.
Fixes: d0d5c0cd1e ("rxrpc: Use skb_unshare() rather than skb_cow_data()")
Reported-by: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The in-place decryption routines in AF_RXRPC's rxkad security module
currently call skb_cow_data() to make sure the data isn't shared and that
the skb can be written over. This has a problem, however, as the softirq
handler may be still holding a ref or the Rx ring may be holding multiple
refs when skb_cow_data() is called in rxkad_verify_packet() - and so
skb_shared() returns true and __pskb_pull_tail() dislikes that. If this
occurs, something like the following report will be generated.
kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:1463!
...
RIP: 0010:pskb_expand_head+0x253/0x2b0
...
Call Trace:
__pskb_pull_tail+0x49/0x460
skb_cow_data+0x6f/0x300
rxkad_verify_packet+0x18b/0xb10 [rxrpc]
rxrpc_recvmsg_data.isra.11+0x4a8/0xa10 [rxrpc]
rxrpc_kernel_recv_data+0x126/0x240 [rxrpc]
afs_extract_data+0x51/0x2d0 [kafs]
afs_deliver_fs_fetch_data+0x188/0x400 [kafs]
afs_deliver_to_call+0xac/0x430 [kafs]
afs_wait_for_call_to_complete+0x22f/0x3d0 [kafs]
afs_make_call+0x282/0x3f0 [kafs]
afs_fs_fetch_data+0x164/0x300 [kafs]
afs_fetch_data+0x54/0x130 [kafs]
afs_readpages+0x20d/0x340 [kafs]
read_pages+0x66/0x180
__do_page_cache_readahead+0x188/0x1a0
ondemand_readahead+0x17d/0x2e0
generic_file_read_iter+0x740/0xc10
__vfs_read+0x145/0x1a0
vfs_read+0x8c/0x140
ksys_read+0x4a/0xb0
do_syscall_64+0x43/0xf0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
Fix this by using skb_unshare() instead in the input path for DATA packets
that have a security index != 0. Non-DATA packets don't need in-place
encryption and neither do unencrypted DATA packets.
Fixes: 248f219cb8 ("rxrpc: Rewrite the data and ack handling code")
Reported-by: Julian Wollrath <jwollrath@web.de>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Use the previously-added transmit-phase skbuff private flag to simplify the
socket buffer tracing a bit. Which phase the skbuff comes from can now be
divined from the skb rather than having to be guessed from the call state.
We can also reduce the number of rxrpc_skb_trace values by eliminating the
difference between Tx and Rx in the symbols.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Pass the reference held on a DATA skb in the rxrpc input handler into the
Rx ring rather than getting an additional ref for this and then dropping
the original ref at the end.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Use the information now cached in the skbuff private data to avoid the need
to reparse a jumbo packet. We can find all the subpackets by dead
reckoning, so it's only necessary to note how many there are, whether the
last one is flagged as LAST_PACKET and whether any have the REQUEST_ACK
flag set.
This is necessary as once recvmsg() can see the packet, it can start
modifying it, such as doing in-place decryption.
Fixes: 248f219cb8 ("rxrpc: Rewrite the data and ack handling code")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Improve the information stored about jumbo packets so that we don't need to
reparse them so much later.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com>
Don't bother generating maxSkew in the ACK packet as it has been obsolete
since AFS 3.1.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com>
The object lifetime management on the rxrpc_local struct is broken in that
the rxrpc_local_processor() function is expected to clean up and remove an
object - but it may get requeued by packets coming in on the backing UDP
socket once it starts running.
This may result in the assertion in rxrpc_local_rcu() firing because the
memory has been scheduled for RCU destruction whilst still queued:
rxrpc: Assertion failed
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at net/rxrpc/local_object.c:468!
Note that if the processor comes around before the RCU free function, it
will just do nothing because ->dead is true.
Fix this by adding a separate refcount to count active users of the
endpoint that causes the endpoint to be destroyed when it reaches 0.
The original refcount can then be used to refcount objects through the work
processor and cause the memory to be rcu freed when that reaches 0.
Fixes: 4f95dd78a7 ("rxrpc: Rework local endpoint management")
Reported-by: syzbot+1e0edc4b8b7494c28450@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s):
this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by
the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at
your option any later version
extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier
GPL-2.0-or-later
has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 3029 file(s).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190527070032.746973796@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The rxrpc packet serial number cannot be safely used to compute out of
order ack packets for several reasons:
1. The allocation of serial numbers cannot be assumed to imply the order
by which acks are populated and transmitted. In some rxrpc
implementations, delayed acks and ping acks are transmitted
asynchronously to the receipt of data packets and so may be transmitted
out of order. As a result, they can race with idle acks.
2. Serial numbers are allocated by the rxrpc connection and not the call
and as such may wrap independently if multiple channels are in use.
In any case, what matters is whether the ack packet provides new
information relating to the bounds of the window (the firstPacket and
previousPacket in the ACK data).
Fix this by discarding packets that appear to wind back the window bounds
rather than on serial number procession.
Fixes: 298bc15b20 ("rxrpc: Only take the rwind and mtu values from latest ACK")
Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Conflicts were easy to resolve using immediate context mostly,
except the cls_u32.c one where I simply too the entire HEAD
chunk.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The rxrpc_input_packet() function and its call tree was built around the
assumption that data_ready() handler called from UDP to inform a kernel
service that there is data to be had was non-reentrant. This means that
certain locking could be dispensed with.
This, however, turns out not to be the case with a multi-queue network card
that can deliver packets to multiple cpus simultaneously. Each of those
cpus can be in the rxrpc_input_packet() function at the same time.
Fix by adding or changing some structure members:
(1) Add peer->rtt_input_lock to serialise access to the RTT buffer.
(2) Make conn->service_id into a 32-bit variable so that it can be
cmpxchg'd on all arches.
(3) Add call->input_lock to serialise access to the Rx/Tx state. Note
that although the Rx and Tx states are (almost) entirely separate,
there's no point completing the separation and having separate locks
since it's a bi-phasal RPC protocol rather than a bi-direction
streaming protocol. Data transmission and data reception do not take
place simultaneously on any particular call.
and making the following functional changes:
(1) In rxrpc_input_data(), hold call->input_lock around the core to
prevent simultaneous producing of packets into the Rx ring and
updating of tracking state for a particular call.
(2) In rxrpc_input_ping_response(), only read call->ping_serial once, and
check it before checking RXRPC_CALL_PINGING as that's a cheaper test.
The bit test and bit clear can then be combined. No further locking
is needed here.
(3) In rxrpc_input_ack(), take call->input_lock after we've parsed much of
the ACK packet. The superseded ACK check is then done both before and
after the lock is taken.
The handing of ackinfo data is split, parsing before the lock is taken
and processing with it held. This is keyed on rxMTU being non-zero.
Congestion management is also done within the locked section.
(4) In rxrpc_input_ackall(), take call->input_lock around the Tx window
rotation. The ACKALL packet carries no information and is only really
useful after all packets have been transmitted since it's imprecise.
(5) In rxrpc_input_implicit_end_call(), we use rx->incoming_lock to
prevent calls being simultaneously implicitly ended on two cpus and
also to prevent any races with incoming call setup.
(6) In rxrpc_input_packet(), use cmpxchg() to effect the service upgrade
on a connection. It is only permitted to happen once for a
connection.
(7) In rxrpc_new_incoming_call(), we have to recheck the routing inside
rx->incoming_lock to see if someone else set up the call, connection
or peer whilst we were getting there. We can't trust the values from
the earlier routing check unless we pin refs on them - which we want
to avoid.
Further, we need to allow for an incoming call to have its state
changed on another CPU between us making it live and us adjusting it
because the conn is now in the RXRPC_CONN_SERVICE state.
(8) In rxrpc_peer_add_rtt(), take peer->rtt_input_lock around the access
to the RTT buffer. Don't need to lock around setting peer->rtt.
For reference, the inventory of state-accessing or state-altering functions
used by the packet input procedure is:
> rxrpc_input_packet()
* PACKET CHECKING
* ROUTING
> rxrpc_post_packet_to_local()
> rxrpc_find_connection_rcu() - uses RCU
> rxrpc_lookup_peer_rcu() - uses RCU
> rxrpc_find_service_conn_rcu() - uses RCU
> idr_find() - uses RCU
* CONNECTION-LEVEL PROCESSING
- Service upgrade
- Can only happen once per conn
! Changed to use cmpxchg
> rxrpc_post_packet_to_conn()
- Setting conn->hi_serial
- Probably safe not using locks
- Maybe use cmpxchg
* CALL-LEVEL PROCESSING
> Old-call checking
> rxrpc_input_implicit_end_call()
> rxrpc_call_completed()
> rxrpc_queue_call()
! Need to take rx->incoming_lock
> __rxrpc_disconnect_call()
> rxrpc_notify_socket()
> rxrpc_new_incoming_call()
- Uses rx->incoming_lock for the entire process
- Might be able to drop this earlier in favour of the call lock
> rxrpc_incoming_call()
! Conflicts with rxrpc_input_implicit_end_call()
> rxrpc_send_ping()
- Don't need locks to check rtt state
> rxrpc_propose_ACK
* PACKET DISTRIBUTION
> rxrpc_input_call_packet()
> rxrpc_input_data()
* QUEUE DATA PACKET ON CALL
> rxrpc_reduce_call_timer()
- Uses timer_reduce()
! Needs call->input_lock()
> rxrpc_receiving_reply()
! Needs locking around ack state
> rxrpc_rotate_tx_window()
> rxrpc_end_tx_phase()
> rxrpc_proto_abort()
> rxrpc_input_dup_data()
- Fills the Rx buffer
- rxrpc_propose_ACK()
- rxrpc_notify_socket()
> rxrpc_input_ack()
* APPLY ACK PACKET TO CALL AND DISCARD PACKET
> rxrpc_input_ping_response()
- Probably doesn't need any extra locking
! Need READ_ONCE() on call->ping_serial
> rxrpc_input_check_for_lost_ack()
- Takes call->lock to consult Tx buffer
> rxrpc_peer_add_rtt()
! Needs to take a lock (peer->rtt_input_lock)
! Could perhaps manage with cmpxchg() and xadd() instead
> rxrpc_input_requested_ack
- Consults Tx buffer
! Probably needs a lock
> rxrpc_peer_add_rtt()
> rxrpc_propose_ack()
> rxrpc_input_ackinfo()
- Changes call->tx_winsize
! Use cmpxchg to handle change
! Should perhaps track serial number
- Uses peer->lock to record MTU specification changes
> rxrpc_proto_abort()
! Need to take call->input_lock
> rxrpc_rotate_tx_window()
> rxrpc_end_tx_phase()
> rxrpc_input_soft_acks()
- Consults the Tx buffer
> rxrpc_congestion_management()
- Modifies the Tx annotations
! Needs call->input_lock()
> rxrpc_queue_call()
> rxrpc_input_abort()
* APPLY ABORT PACKET TO CALL AND DISCARD PACKET
> rxrpc_set_call_completion()
> rxrpc_notify_socket()
> rxrpc_input_ackall()
* APPLY ACKALL PACKET TO CALL AND DISCARD PACKET
! Need to take call->input_lock
> rxrpc_rotate_tx_window()
> rxrpc_end_tx_phase()
> rxrpc_reject_packet()
There are some functions used by the above that queue the packet, after
which the procedure is terminated:
- rxrpc_post_packet_to_local()
- local->event_queue is an sk_buff_head
- local->processor is a work_struct
- rxrpc_post_packet_to_conn()
- conn->rx_queue is an sk_buff_head
- conn->processor is a work_struct
- rxrpc_reject_packet()
- local->reject_queue is an sk_buff_head
- local->processor is a work_struct
And some that offload processing to process context:
- rxrpc_notify_socket()
- Uses RCU lock
- Uses call->notify_lock to call call->notify_rx
- Uses call->recvmsg_lock to queue recvmsg side
- rxrpc_queue_call()
- call->processor is a work_struct
- rxrpc_propose_ACK()
- Uses call->lock to wrap __rxrpc_propose_ACK()
And a bunch that complete a call, all of which use call->state_lock to
protect the call state:
- rxrpc_call_completed()
- rxrpc_set_call_completion()
- rxrpc_abort_call()
- rxrpc_proto_abort()
- Also uses rxrpc_queue_call()
Fixes: 17926a7932 ("[AF_RXRPC]: Provide secure RxRPC sockets for use by userspace and kernel both")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Move the out-of-order and duplicate ACK packet check to before the call to
rxrpc_input_ackinfo() so that the receive window size and MTU size are only
checked in the latest ACK packet and don't regress.
Fixes: 248f219cb8 ("rxrpc: Rewrite the data and ack handling code")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Carry the call state out of the locked section in rxrpc_rotate_tx_window()
rather than sampling it afterwards. This is only used to select tracepoint
data, but could have changed by the time we do the tracepoint.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
We should only call the function to end a call's Tx phase if we rotated the
marked-last packet out of the transmission buffer.
Make rxrpc_rotate_tx_window() return an indication of whether it just
rotated the packet marked as the last out of the transmit buffer, carrying
the information out of the locked section in that function.
We can then check the return value instead of examining RXRPC_CALL_TX_LAST.
Fixes: 70790dbe3f ("rxrpc: Pass the last Tx packet marker in the annotation buffer")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
