Pull driver core updates from Greg KH:
"Here is the set of driver core patches for 5.8-rc1.
Not all that huge this release, just a number of small fixes and
updates:
- software node fixes
- kobject now sends KOBJ_REMOVE when it is removed from sysfs, not
when it is removed from memory (which could come much later)
- device link additions and fixes based on testing on more devices
- firmware core cleanups
- other minor changes, full details in the shortlog
All have been in linux-next for a while with no reported issues"
* tag 'driver-core-5.8-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core: (23 commits)
driver core: Update device link status correctly for SYNC_STATE_ONLY links
firmware_loader: change enum fw_opt to u32
software node: implement software_node_unregister()
kobject: send KOBJ_REMOVE uevent when the object is removed from sysfs
driver core: Remove unnecessary is_fwnode_dev variable in device_add()
drivers property: When no children in primary, try secondary
driver core: platform: Fix spelling errors in platform.c
driver core: Remove check in driver_deferred_probe_force_trigger()
of: platform: Batch fwnode parsing when adding all top level devices
driver core: fw_devlink: Add support for batching fwnode parsing
driver core: Look for waiting consumers only for a fwnode's primary device
driver core: Move code to the right part of the file
Revert "Revert "driver core: Set fw_devlink to "permissive" behavior by default""
drivers: base: Fix NULL pointer exception in __platform_driver_probe() if a driver developer is foolish
firmware_loader: move fw_fallback_config to a private kernel symbol namespace
driver core: Add missing '\n' in log messages
driver/base/soc: Use kobj_to_dev() API
Add documentation on meaning of -EPROBE_DEFER
driver core: platform: remove redundant assignment to variable ret
debugfs: Use the correct style for SPDX License Identifier
...
This reverts commit 3df85a1ae5.
The reverted commit says "It's possible to release the node ID
immediately when fwnode_remove_software_node() is called, no need to
wait for software_node_release() with that." However, releasing the node
ID before waiting for software_node_release() to be called causes the
node ID to be released before the kobject and the underlying sysfs
entry; this means there is a period of time where a sysfs entry exists
that is associated with an unallocated node ID.
Once consequence of this is that there is a race condition where it is
possible to call fwnode_create_software_node() with no parent node
specified (NULL) and have it fail with -EEXIST because the node ID that
was assigned is still associated with a stale sysfs entry that hasn't
been cleaned up yet.
Although it is difficult to reproduce this race condition under normal
conditions, it can be deterministically reproduced with the following
minconfig on UML:
CONFIG_KUNIT_DRIVER_PE_TEST=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_TIMERS=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE=y
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
Running the tests with this configuration causes the following failure:
<snip>
kobject: 'node0' ((____ptrval____)): kobject_release, parent (____ptrval____) (delayed 400)
ok 1 - pe_test_uints
sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/kernel/software_nodes/node0'
CPU: 0 PID: 28 Comm: kunit_try_catch Not tainted 5.6.0-rc3-next-20200227 #14
<snip>
kobject_add_internal failed for node0 with -EEXIST, don't try to register things with the same name in the same directory.
kobject: 'node0' ((____ptrval____)): kobject_release, parent (____ptrval____) (delayed 100)
# pe_test_uint_arrays: ASSERTION FAILED at drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c:123
Expected node is not error, but is: -17
not ok 2 - pe_test_uint_arrays
<snip>
Reported-by: Heidi Fahim <heidifahim@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Cc: 5.3+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.3+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Now that all users of references have moved to reference properties,
we can remove separate handling of references.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
It is possible to store references to software nodes in the same fashion as
other static properties, so that users do not need to define separate
structures:
static const struct software_node gpio_bank_b_node = {
.name = "B",
};
static const struct property_entry simone_key_enter_props[] = {
PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("linux,code", KEY_ENTER),
PROPERTY_ENTRY_STRING("label", "enter"),
PROPERTY_ENTRY_REF("gpios", &gpio_bank_b_node, 123, GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW),
{ }
};
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
We should not conflate whether a property data is an array or a single
value with where it is stored (embedded into property_entry structure or
out-of-line). All single-value properties are in effect 1-element
arrays, and we can figure the amount of data stored in a property by
examining its length and the data type. And arrays can be as easily
stored in property entry instances as single values are, provided that
we have enough space (we have up to 8 bytes). We can embed:
- up to 8 bytes from U8 arrays
- up to 4 words
- up to 2 double words
- one U64 value
- one (on 64 bit architectures) or 2 (on 32 bit) strings.
This change also has an effect of switching properties with small amount
of data to embed it instead of keeping it separate when copying such
properties.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
We do not need a special flag to know if we are dealing with an
array, as we can get that data from ratio between element length and
the data size, but we do need a flag to know whether or not the data
is stored directly inside property_entry.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
[ rjw: Subject & changelog, struct property_entry kerneldoc ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
There is no need to treat string arrays and single strings separately, we can go
exclusively by the element length in relation to data type size.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
There is absolutely no reason to have them as we can handle it all nicely in
property_entry_read_int_array().
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Instead of explicitly setting values of integer types when copying
property entries lets just copy entire value union when processing
non-array values.
For value arrays we no longer use union of pointers, but rather a single
void pointer, which allows us to remove property_set_pointer().
In property_get_pointer() we do not need to handle each data type
separately, we can simply return either the pointer or pointer to values
union.
We are not losing anything from removing typed pointer union because the
upper layers do their accesses through void pointers anyway, and we
trust the "type" of the property when interpret the data. We rely on
users of property entries on using PROPERTY_ENTRY_XXX() macros to
properly initialize entries instead of poking in the instances directly.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Because property_copy_string_array() stores the newly allocated pointer in the
destination property, we have an awkward code in property_entry_copy_data()
where we fetch the new pointer from dst.
Let's change property_copy_string_array() to return pointer and rely on the
common path in property_entry_copy_data() to store it in destination structure.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The fwnode framework did not have means to obtain the name of a node. Add
that now, in form of the fwnode_get_name() function and a corresponding
get_name fwnode op. OF and ACPI support is included.
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> (for OF)
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The software_node_get_parent() returned a pointer to the parent swnode,
but did not take a reference to it, leading the caller to put a reference
that was not taken. Take that reference now.
Fixes: 59abd83672 ("drivers: base: Introducing software nodes to the firmware node framework")
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The software node is searched from a list that may be empty
when the function is called. This makes sure that the
function returns NULL even if the list is empty.
Fixes: 80488a6b1d ("software node: Add support for static node descriptors")
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Until now the software nodes could only be created
dynamically with fwnode_create_software_node() function.
This introduces struct software_node data structure, which
makes it possible to describe the software nodes also
statically.
The statically described software nodes can be registered
with a new function fwnode_register_software_node(). This
also adds a helper fwnode_register_software_nodes()
which makes it possible to register an array of struct
software_nodes, i.e. multiple nodes at the same time.
There is no difference between statically described and
dynamically allocated software nodes. Even the registration
does not differ, except that during node creation the device
properties are only copied if the node is created
dynamically. With statically described nodes, the property
entries in the descriptor (struct software_node) are
assigned directly to the new software node that is being
created without any copies.
Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
It's possible to release the node ID immediately when
fwnode_remove_software_node() is called, no need to wait for
software_node_release() with that.
Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Software nodes are not forced to have device properties.
Adding check to property_entries_dup() to make it possible
to create software nodes that don't have any properties.
Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
