The rcu_nmi_enter_common() function can be invoked both in interrupt
and NMI handlers. If it is invoked from process context (as opposed
to userspace or idle context) on a nohz_full CPU, it might acquire the
CPU's leaf rcu_node structure's ->lock. Because this lock is held only
with interrupts disabled, this is safe from an interrupt handler, but
doing so from an NMI handler can result in self-deadlock.
This commit therefore adds "irq" to the "if" condition so as to only
acquire the ->lock from irq handlers or process context, never from
an NMI handler.
Fixes: 5b14557b07 ("rcu: Avoid tick_dep_set_cpu() misordering")
Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.5.x
Pull locking updates from Ingo Molnar:
"The main changes in this cycle were:
- Continued user-access cleanups in the futex code.
- percpu-rwsem rewrite that uses its own waitqueue and atomic_t
instead of an embedded rwsem. This addresses a couple of
weaknesses, but the primary motivation was complications on the -rt
kernel.
- Introduce raw lock nesting detection on lockdep
(CONFIG_PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING=y), document the raw_lock vs. normal
lock differences. This too originates from -rt.
- Reuse lockdep zapped chain_hlocks entries, to conserve RAM
footprint on distro-ish kernels running into the "BUG:
MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS too low!" depletion of the lockdep
chain-entries pool.
- Misc cleanups, smaller fixes and enhancements - see the changelog
for details"
* 'locking-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (55 commits)
fs/buffer: Make BH_Uptodate_Lock bit_spin_lock a regular spinlock_t
thermal/x86_pkg_temp: Make pkg_temp_lock a raw_spinlock_t
Documentation/locking/locktypes: Minor copy editor fixes
Documentation/locking/locktypes: Further clarifications and wordsmithing
m68knommu: Remove mm.h include from uaccess_no.h
x86: get rid of user_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic()
generic arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser() doesn't need access_ok()
x86: don't reload after cmpxchg in unsafe_atomic_op2() loop
x86: convert arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser() to user_access_begin/user_access_end()
objtool: whitelist __sanitizer_cov_trace_switch()
[parisc, s390, sparc64] no need for access_ok() in futex handling
sh: no need of access_ok() in arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser()
futex: arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser() calling conventions change
completion: Use lockdep_assert_RT_in_threaded_ctx() in complete_all()
lockdep: Add posixtimer context tracing bits
lockdep: Annotate irq_work
lockdep: Add hrtimer context tracing bits
lockdep: Introduce wait-type checks
completion: Use simple wait queues
sched/swait: Prepare usage in completions
...
Currently, rcu_barrier() ignores offline CPUs, However, it is possible
for an offline no-CBs CPU to have callbacks queued, and rcu_barrier()
must wait for those callbacks. This commit therefore makes rcu_barrier()
directly invoke the rcu_barrier_func() with interrupts disabled for such
CPUs. This requires passing the CPU number into this function so that
it can entrain the rcu_barrier() callback onto the correct CPU's callback
list, given that the code must instead execute on the current CPU.
While in the area, this commit fixes a bug where the first CPU's callback
might have been invoked before rcu_segcblist_entrain() returned, which
would also result in an early wakeup.
Fixes: 5d6742b377 ("rcu/nocb: Use rcu_segcblist for no-CBs CPUs")
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
[ paulmck: Apply optimization feedback from Boqun Feng. ]
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.5.x
The rcu_state structure's gp_seq field is only to be modified by the RCU
grace-period kthread, which is single-threaded. This commit therefore
enlists KCSAN's help in enforcing this restriction.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Mark irq_work items with IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ which should be invoked in
hardirq context even on PREEMPT_RT. IRQ_WORK without this flag will be
invoked in softirq context on PREEMPT_RT.
Set ->irq_config to 1 for the IRQ_WORK items which are invoked in softirq
context so lockdep knows that these can safely acquire a spinlock_t.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200321113242.643576700@linutronix.de
Extend lockdep to validate lock wait-type context.
The current wait-types are:
LD_WAIT_FREE, /* wait free, rcu etc.. */
LD_WAIT_SPIN, /* spin loops, raw_spinlock_t etc.. */
LD_WAIT_CONFIG, /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_LOCK, spinlock_t etc.. */
LD_WAIT_SLEEP, /* sleeping locks, mutex_t etc.. */
Where lockdep validates that the current lock (the one being acquired)
fits in the current wait-context (as generated by the held stack).
This ensures that there is no attempt to acquire mutexes while holding
spinlocks, to acquire spinlocks while holding raw_spinlocks and so on. In
other words, its a more fancy might_sleep().
Obviously RCU made the entire ordeal more complex than a simple single
value test because RCU can be acquired in (pretty much) any context and
while it presents a context to nested locks it is not the same as it
got acquired in.
Therefore its necessary to split the wait_type into two values, one
representing the acquire (outer) and one representing the nested context
(inner). For most 'normal' locks these two are the same.
[ To make static initialization easier we have the rule that:
.outer == INV means .outer == .inner; because INV == 0. ]
It further means that its required to find the minimal .inner of the held
stack to compare against the outer of the new lock; because while 'normal'
RCU presents a CONFIG type to nested locks, if it is taken while already
holding a SPIN type it obviously doesn't relax the rules.
Below is an example output generated by the trivial test code:
raw_spin_lock(&foo);
spin_lock(&bar);
spin_unlock(&bar);
raw_spin_unlock(&foo);
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
-----------------------------
swapper/0/1 is trying to lock:
ffffc90000013f20 (&bar){....}-{3:3}, at: kernel_init+0xdb/0x187
other info that might help us debug this:
1 lock held by swapper/0/1:
#0: ffffc90000013ee0 (&foo){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: kernel_init+0xd1/0x187
The way to read it is to look at the new -{n,m} part in the lock
description; -{3:3} for the attempted lock, and try and match that up to
the held locks, which in this case is the one: -{2,2}.
This tells that the acquiring lock requires a more relaxed environment than
presented by the lock stack.
Currently only the normal locks and RCU are converted, the rest of the
lockdep users defaults to .inner = INV which is ignored. More conversions
can be done when desired.
The check for spinlock_t nesting is not enabled by default. It's a separate
config option for now as there are known problems which are currently
addressed. The config option allows to identify these problems and to
verify that the solutions found are indeed solving them.
The config switch will be removed and the checks will permanently enabled
once the vast majority of issues has been addressed.
[ bigeasy: Move LD_WAIT_FREE,… out of CONFIG_LOCKDEP to avoid compile
failure with CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK + !CONFIG_LOCKDEP]
[ tglx: Add the config option ]
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200321113242.427089655@linutronix.de
Currently, if rcu_barrier() returns too soon, the test waits 100ms and
then does another instance of the test. However, if rcu_barrier() were
to have waited for more than 100ms too short a time, this could cause
the test's rcu_head structures to be reused while they were still on
RCU's callback lists. This can result in knock-on errors that obscure
the original rcu_barrier() test failure.
This commit therefore adds code that attempts to wait until all of
the test's callbacks have been invoked. Of course, if RCU completely
lost track of the corresponding rcu_head structures, this wait could be
forever. This commit therefore also complains if this attempted recovery
takes more than one second, and it also gives up when the test ends.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Currently, rcu_torture_barrier_cbs() posts callbacks from whatever CPU
it is running on, which means that all these kthreads might well be
posting from the same CPU, which would drastically reduce the effectiveness
of this test. This commit therefore uses IPIs to make the callbacks be
posted from the corresponding CPU (given by local variable myid).
If the IPI fails (which can happen if the target CPU is offline or does
not exist at all), the callback is posted on whatever CPU is currently
running.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
During changes to kfree_rcu() code, we often check the amount of free
memory. As an alternative to checking this manually, this commit adds a
measurement in the test itself. It measures four times during the test
for available memory, digitally filters these measurements to produce a
running average with a weight of 0.5, and compares this digitally filtered
value with the amount of available memory at the beginning of the test.
Something like the following is printed at the end of the run:
Total time taken by all kfree'ers: 6369738407 ns, loops: 10000, batches: 764, memory footprint: 216MB
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
The rcutorture global variable rcu_torture_current is accessed locklessly,
so it must use the RCU pointer load/store primitives. This commit
therefore adds several that were missed.
This data race was reported by KCSAN. Not appropriate for backporting due
to failure being unlikely and due to this being used only by rcutorture.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
The rcutorture rcu_torture_count and rcu_torture_batch per-CPU variables
are read locklessly, so this commit adds the READ_ONCE() to a load in
order to avoid various types of compiler vandalism^Woptimization.
This data race was reported by KCSAN. Not appropriate for backporting
due to failure being unlikely and due to this being rcutorture.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
The rcu_fwd_cb_nodelay variable suppresses excessively long read-side
delays while carrying out an rcutorture forward-progress test. As such,
it is accessed both by readers and updaters, and most of the accesses
therefore use *_ONCE(). Except for one in rcu_read_delay(), which this
commit fixes.
This data race was reported by KCSAN. Not appropriate for backporting
due to this being rcutorture.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
The ->rtort_pipe_count field in the rcu_torture structure checks for
too-short grace periods, and is therefore read by rcutorture's readers
while being updated by rcutorture's writers. This commit therefore
adds the needed READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() invocations.
This data race was reported by KCSAN. Not appropriate for backporting
due to failure being unlikely and due to this being rcutorture.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
In normal production, an excessively long wait on a grace period
(synchronize_rcu(), for example) at boottime is often just as bad
as at any other time. In fact, given the desire for fast boot, any
sort of long wait at boot is a bad idea. However, heavy rcutorture
testing on large hyperthreaded systems can generate such long waits
during boot as a matter of course. This commit therefore causes
the rcupdate.rcu_cpu_stall_suppress_at_boot kernel boot parameter to
suppress reporting of bootime bad-sequence warning due to excessively
long grace-period waits.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
In normal production, an RCU CPU stall warning at boottime is often
just as bad as at any other time. In fact, given the desire for fast
boot, any sort of long-term stall at boot is a bad idea. However,
heavy rcutorture testing on large hyperthreaded systems can generate
boottime RCU CPU stalls as a matter of course. This commit therefore
provides a kernel boot parameter that suppresses reporting of boottime
RCU CPU stall warnings and similarly of rcutorture writer stalls.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Additional rcutorture aggression can result in, believe it or not,
boot times in excess of three minutes on large hyperthreaded systems.
This is long enough for rcutorture to decide to do some callback flooding,
which seems a bit excessive given that userspace cannot have started
until long after boot, and it is userspace that does the real-world
callback flooding. Worse yet, because Tiny RCU lacks forward-progress
functionality, the looping-in-the-kernel tests can also be problematic
during early boot.
This commit therefore causes rcutorture to hold off on callback
flooding until about the time that init is spawned, and the same
for looping-in-the-kernel tests for Tiny RCU.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Some larger systems can take in excess of 50 seconds to complete their
early boot initcalls prior to spawing init. This does not in any way
help the forward-progress judgments of built-in rcutorture (when
rcutorture is built as a module, the insmod or modprobe command normally
cannot happen until some time after boot completes). This commit
therefore suppresses such complaints until about the time that init
is spawned.
This also includes a fix to a stupid error located by kbuild test robot.
[ paulmck: Apply kbuild test robot feedback. ]
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
[ paulmck: Fix to nohz_full slow-expediting recovery logic, per bpetkov. ]
[ paulmck: Restrict splat to CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT=y kernels and simplify. ]
Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
A read of the srcu_struct structure's ->srcu_gp_seq field should not
need READ_ONCE() when that structure's ->lock is held. Except that this
lock is not always held when updating this field. This commit therefore
acquires the lock around updates and removes a now-unneeded READ_ONCE().
This data race was reported by KCSAN.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
[ paulmck: Switch from READ_ONCE() to lock per Peter Zilstra question. ]
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
The srcu_struct structure's ->srcu_idx field is accessed locklessly,
so reads must use READ_ONCE(). This commit therefore adds the needed
READ_ONCE() invocation where it was missed.
This data race was reported by KCSAN. Not appropriate for backporting
due to failure being unlikely.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
The srcu_struct structure's ->srcu_gp_seq_needed_exp field is accessed
locklessly, so updates must use WRITE_ONCE(). This commit therefore
adds the needed WRITE_ONCE() invocations.
This data race was reported by KCSAN. Not appropriate for backporting
due to failure being unlikely.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
The srcu_node structure's ->srcu_gp_seq_needed_exp field is accessed
locklessly, so updates must use WRITE_ONCE(). This commit therefore
adds the needed WRITE_ONCE() invocations.
This data race was reported by KCSAN. Not appropriate for backporting
due to failure being unlikely.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Sparse reports a warning at exit_tasks_rcu_finish(void)
|warning: context imbalance in exit_tasks_rcu_finish()
|- wrong count at exit
To fix this, this commit adds a __releases(&tasks_rcu_exit_srcu).
Given that exit_tasks_rcu_finish() does actually call __srcu_read_lock(),
this not only fixes the warning but also improves on the readability of
the code.
Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Sparse reports a warning at exit_tasks_rcu_start(void)
|warning: context imbalance in exit_tasks_rcu_start() - wrong count at exit
To fix this, this commit adds an __acquires(&tasks_rcu_exit_srcu).
Given that exit_tasks_rcu_start() does actually call __srcu_read_lock(),
this not only fixes the warning but also improves on the readability of
the code.
Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
