drm/i915 fixes for v5.6-rc3:
- Workaround missing Display Stream Compression (DSC) state readout by
forcing modeset when its enabled at probe
- Fix EHL port clock voltage level requirements
- Fix queuing retire workers on the virtual engine
- Fix use of partially initialized waiters
- Stop using drm_pci_alloc/drm_pci/free
- Fix rewind of RING_TAIL by forcing a context reload
- Fix locking on resetting ring->head
- Propagate our bug filing URL change to stable kernels
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/87y2sxtsrd.fsf@intel.com
Use the existence of the workqueue itself to determine when to
enable HDCP features rather than sprinkling asic checks all over
the code. Also add a check for the existence of the hdcp
workqueue in the irq handling on the off chance we get and HPD
RX interrupt with the CP bit set. This avoids a crash if
the driver doesn't support HDCP for a particular asic.
Fixes: 96a3b32e67 ("drm/amd/display: only enable HDCP for DCN+")
Bug: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206519
Reviewed-by: Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The rlc version of raven_kicer_rlc is different from the legacy rlc
version of raven_rlc. So it needs to add a judgement function for
raven_kicer_rlc and avoid disable GFXOFF when loading raven_kicer_rlc.
Signed-off-by: changzhu <Changfeng.Zhu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
If we rewind the RING_TAIL on a context, due to a preemption event, we
must force the context restore for the RING_TAIL update to be properly
handled. Rather than note which preemption events may cause us to rewind
the tail, compare the new request's tail with the previously submitted
RING_TAIL, as it turns out that timeslicing was causing unexpected
rewinds.
<idle>-0 0d.s2 1280851190us : __execlists_submission_tasklet: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: expired last=130:4698, prio=3, hint=3
<idle>-0 0d.s2 1280851192us : __i915_request_unsubmit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 66:119966, current 119964
<idle>-0 0d.s2 1280851195us : __i915_request_unsubmit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 130:4698, current 4695
<idle>-0 0d.s2 1280851198us : __i915_request_unsubmit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 130:4696, current 4695
^---- Note we unwind 2 requests from the same context
<idle>-0 0d.s2 1280851208us : __i915_request_submit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 130:4696, current 4695
<idle>-0 0d.s2 1280851213us : __i915_request_submit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 134:1508, current 1506
^---- But to apply the new timeslice, we have to replay the first request
before the new client can start -- the unexpected RING_TAIL rewind
<idle>-0 0d.s2 1280851219us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: submit { 130:4696*, 134:1508 }
synmark2-5425 2..s. 1280851239us : process_csb: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: cs-irq head=5, tail=0
synmark2-5425 2..s. 1280851240us : process_csb: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: csb[0]: status=0x00008002:0x00000000
^---- Preemption event for the ELSP update; note the lite-restore
synmark2-5425 2..s. 1280851243us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: preempted { 130:4698, 66:119966 }
synmark2-5425 2..s. 1280851246us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: promote { 130:4696*, 134:1508 }
synmark2-5425 2.... 1280851462us : __i915_request_commit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 130:4700, current 4695
synmark2-5425 2.... 1280852111us : __i915_request_commit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 130:4702, current 4695
synmark2-5425 2.Ns1 1280852296us : process_csb: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: cs-irq head=0, tail=2
synmark2-5425 2.Ns1 1280852297us : process_csb: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: csb[1]: status=0x00000814:0x00000000
synmark2-5425 2.Ns1 1280852299us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: completed { 130:4696!, 134:1508 }
synmark2-5425 2.Ns1 1280852301us : process_csb: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: csb[2]: status=0x00000818:0x00000040
synmark2-5425 2.Ns1 1280852302us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: completed { 134:1508, 0:0 }
synmark2-5425 2.Ns1 1280852313us : process_csb: process_csb:2336 GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_request_completed(*execlists->active) && !reset_in_progress(execlists))
Fixes: 8ee36e048c ("drm/i915/execlists: Minimalistic timeslicing")
Referenecs: 82c69bf586 ("drm/i915/gt: Detect if we miss WaIdleLiteRestore")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.4+
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200207211452.2860634-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 5ba32c7be8)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Virtual engines are fleeting. They carry a reference count and may be freed
when their last request is retired. This makes them unsuitable for the
task of housing engine->retire.work so assert that it is not used.
Tvrtko tracked down an instance where we did indeed violate this rule.
In virtual_submit_request, we flush a completed request directly with
__i915_request_submit and this causes us to queue that request on the
veng's breadcrumb list and signal it. Leading us down a path where we
should not attach the retire.
Reported-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Fixes: dc93c9b693 ("drm/i915/gt: Schedule request retirement when signaler idles")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200206204915.2636606-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit f91d8156ab)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To enable non-persistent contexts, we require a means of cancelling any
inflight work from that context. This is first done "gracefully" by
using preemption to kick the active context off the engine, and then
forcefully by resetting the engine if it is active. If we are unable to
reset the engine to remove hostile userspace, we should not allow
userspace to opt into using non-persistent contexts.
If the per-engine reset fails, we still do a full GPU reset, but that is
rare and usually indicative of much deeper issues. The damage is already
done. However, the goal of the interface to allow long running compute
jobs without causing collateral damage elsewhere, and if we are unable
to support that we should make that known by not providing the
interface (and falsely pretending we can).
Fixes: a0e047156c ("drm/i915/gem: Make context persistence optional")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200130164553.1937718-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit d1b9b5f127)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
While certain modeset operations on gv100+ need us to temporarily
disable the LUT, we make the mistake of sometimes neglecting to
reprogram the LUT after such modesets. In particular, moving a head from
one encoder to another seems to trigger this quite often. GV100+ is very
picky about having a LUT in most scenarios, so this causes the display
engine to hang with the following error code:
disp: chid 1 stat 00005080 reason 5 [INVALID_STATE] mthd 0200 data
00000001 code 0000002d)
So, fix this by always re-programming the LUT if we're clearing it in a
state where the wndw is still visible, and has a XLUT handle programmed.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Fixes: facaed62b4 ("drm/nouveau/kms/gv100: initial support")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.18+
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
there was a type in the terminate command.
We should be calling psp_dtm_unload() instead of psp_hdcp_unload()
Fixes: 143f230533 ("drm/amdgpu: psp DTM init")
Signed-off-by: Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Feifei Xu <Feifei.Xu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
