While they are registered all our watchdogs now have a valid device object
so we can in turn use that to report problems nicely.
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>
Some watchdogs merely trigger external alarms and controls. In a managed
environment this is very useful but we want drivers to be able to figure
out which is which now multiple dogs can be loaded. Thus add an ALARMONLY
feature flag.
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>
We keep the old /dev/watchdog interface file for the first watchdog via
miscdev. This is basically a cut and paste of the relevant interface code
from the rtc driver layer tweaked for watchdog.
Revised to fix problems noted by Hans de Goede
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>
The watchdog_core include file should have been named
watchdog_core.h and not watchdog_dev.h . Correct this.
Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>
Some watchdog may need to check if watchdog is ACTIVE or not, for example in
their suspend/resume hooks.
This patch adds this routine and changes the core drivers to use it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>
Include the private watchdog_dev.h header to pickup the prototypes for the
watchdog_dev_register/unregister functions.
This quiets the following sparse warnings:
warning: symbol 'watchdog_dev_register' was not declared. Should it be static?
warning: symbol 'watchdog_dev_unregister' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>
lglocks and brlocks are currently generated with some complicated macros
in lglock.h. But there's no reason to not just use common utility
functions and put all the data into a common data structure.
In preparation, this patch changes the API to look more like normal
function calls with pointers, not magic macros.
The patch is rather large because I move over all users in one go to keep
it bisectable. This impacts the VFS somewhat in terms of lines changed.
But no actual behaviour change.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: checkpatch fixes]
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
lglocks and brlocks are currently generated with some complicated macros
in lglock.h. But there's no reason to not just use common utility
functions and put all the data into a common data structure.
Since there are at least two users it makes sense to share this code in a
library. This is also easier maintainable than a macro forest.
This will also make it later possible to dynamically allocate lglocks and
also use them in modules (this would both still need some additional, but
now straightforward, code)
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: checkpatch fixes]
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Optimizing the slow paths adds a lot of complexity. If you need to
grab every lock often, you have other problems.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Acked-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
seeing that "fast" symlinks still get allocation + copy, we might as
well simply switch them to pagecache-based variant of ->follow_link();
just need an appropriate ->readpage() for them...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>