Change the LONG_MAX in simple_offset_add to 1024, and do latter:
[root@fedora ~]# mkdir /tmp/dir
[root@fedora ~]# for i in {1..1024}; do touch /tmp/dir/$i; done
touch: cannot touch '/tmp/dir/1024': Device or resource busy
[root@fedora ~]# rm /tmp/dir/123
[root@fedora ~]# touch /tmp/dir/1024
[root@fedora ~]# rm /tmp/dir/100
[root@fedora ~]# touch /tmp/dir/1025
touch: cannot touch '/tmp/dir/1025': Device or resource busy
After we delete file 100, actually this is a empty entry, but the latter
create failed unexpected.
mas_alloc_cyclic has two chance to find empty entry. First find the entry
with range range_lo and range_hi, if no empty entry exist, and range_lo >
min, retry find with range min and range_hi. However, the first call
mas_empty_area may mark mas as EBUSY, and the second call for
mas_empty_area will return false directly. Fix this by reload mas before
second call for mas_empty_area.
[Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com: fix mas_alloc_cyclic() second search]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241216060600.287B4C4CED0@smtp.kernel.org/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241216190113.1226145-2-Liam.Howlett@oracle.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241214093005.72284-1-yangerkun@huaweicloud.com
Fixes: 9b6713cc75 ("maple_tree: Add mtree_alloc_cyclic()")
Signed-off-by: Yang Erkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> says:
Cc: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Currently, when storing NULL on mas_store_root(), the behavior could be
improved.
Storing NULLs over the entire tree may result in a node being used to
store a single range. Further stores of NULL may cause the node and
tree to be corrupt and cause incorrect behaviour. Fixing the store to
the root null fixes the issue by ensuring that a range of 0 - ULONG_MAX
results in an empty tree.
Users of the tree may experience incorrect values returned if the tree
was expanded to store values, then overwritten by all NULLS, then
continued to store NULLs over the empty area.
For example possible cases are:
* store NULL at any range result a new node
* store NULL at range [m, n] where m > 0 to a single entry tree result
a new node with range [m, n] set to NULL
* store NULL at range [m, n] where m > 0 to an empty tree result
consecutive NULL slot
* it allows for multiple NULL entries by expanding root
to store NULLs to an empty tree
This patch tries to improve in:
* memory efficient by setting to empty tree instead of using a node
* remove the possibility of consecutive NULL slot which will prohibit
extended null in later operation
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241031231627.14316-5-richard.weiyang@gmail.com
Fixes: 54a611b605 ("Maple Tree: add new data structure")
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
Cc: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
Cc: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "refine storing null", v5.
When overwriting the whole range with NULL, current behavior is not
correct.
An empty tree is represented by having the tree point to NULL directly.
An empty tree indicates the entire range (0-ULONG_MAX) is NULL.
A store operation into an existing node that causes 0 - ULONG_MAX to be
equal to NULL may not be restored to an empty state - a node is used to
store the single range instead. This is wasteful and different from the
initial setup of the tree.
Once the tree is using a single node to store 0 - ULONG_MAX, problems may
arise when storing more values into a tree with the unexpected state of 0
- ULONG being a single range in a node.
User visible issues may mean a corrupt tree and incorrect storage of
information within the tree. This would be limited to users who create
and then empty a tree by overwriting all values, then try to store more
NULLs into the empty tree.
I cannot come up with an example of any user doing this (users usually
destroy the tree and generally don't keep trying to store NULLs over
NULLs), but patch 4/5 "maple_tree: refine mas_store_root() on storing
NULL" should be backported just in case.
This patch (of 5):
Currently for an empty tree, it would print:
maple_tree(0x7ffcd02c6ee0) flags 1, height 0 root (nil)
0: (nil)
This is a little misleading.
Let's print (empty) for an empty tree.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241031231627.14316-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241031231627.14316-2-richard.weiyang@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
Cc: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
Cc: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
In the following code, the second call to the mas_node_count will return
-ENOMEM:
mas_node_count(mas, MAPLE_ALLOC_SLOTS + 1);
mas_node_count(mas, MAPLE_ALLOC_SLOTS * 2 + 2);
This is because there may be some full maple_alloc node in current maple
state. Use full maple_alloc node will make max_req equal to 0. And it
leads to mt_alloc_bulk return 0. As a result, mas_node_count set mas.node
to MA_ERROR(-ENOMEM).
Find a non-full maple_alloc node, and if necessary, use this non-full node
in the next while loop.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240626160631.3636515-1-Liam.Howlett@oracle.com
Fixes: 54a611b605 ("Maple Tree: add new data structure")
Signed-off-by: Jiazi Li <jqqlijiazi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Suggested-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Many maple tree values output when an mt_validate() or equivalent hits an
issue utilise tagged pointers, most notably parent nodes. Also some
pivots/slots contain meaningful values, output as pointers, such as the
index of the last entry with data for example.
All pointer values such as this are destroyed by kernel pointer hashing
rendering the debug output obtained from CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_MAPLE_TREE
considerably less usable.
Update this code to output the raw pointers using %px rather than %p when
CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_MAPLE_TREE is defined. This is justified, as the use of
this configuration flag indicates that this is a test environment.
Userland does not understand %px, so use %p there.
In an abundance of caution, if CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_MAPLE_TREE is not set, also
use %p to avoid exposing raw kernel pointers except when we are positive a
testing mode is enabled.
This was inspired by the investigation performed in recent debugging
efforts around a maple tree regression [0] where kernel pointer tagging had
to be disabled in order to obtain truly meaningful and useful data.
[0]:https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241001023402.3374-1-spasswolf@web.de/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241007115335.90104-1-lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
Cc: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
In mast_fill_bnode(), we first clear some fields of maple_big_node and set
the 'type' unconditionally before return. This means we won't leverage
any information in maple_big_node and it is safe to clear the whole
structure.
In maple_big_node, we define slot and padding/gap in a union. And based
on current definition of MAPLE_BIG_NODE_SLOTS/GAPS, padding is always less
than slot and part of the gap is overlapped by slot.
For example on 64bit system:
MAPLE_BIG_NODE_SLOT is 34
MAPLE_BIG_NODE_GAP is 21
With this knowledge, current code may clear some space by twice. And
this could be avoid by clearing the structure as a whole.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240908140554.20378-3-richard.weiyang@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
When we break the loop after assigning a pivot, the index i/j is not
changed. Then the following code assign pivot, which means we do the
assignment with same i/j by mas_safe_pivot.
Since the loop condition is (i < piv_end), from which we can get i is less
than mt_pivots[mt]. It implies mas_safe_pivot() return pivot[i] which is
the same value we get in loop.
Now we can conclude it does a redundant assignment on a pivot of 0. Let's
just go to complete to avoid it.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240911142759.20989-3-richard.weiyang@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "refine mas_mab_cp()".
By analysis of the code, one condition check can be removed and one case
would hit a redundant assignment.
This patch (of 2):
mas_mab_cp() copy range [mas_start, mas_end] inclusively from a
maple_node to maple_big_node. This implies mas_start <= mas_end.
Based on the relationship of mas_start and mas_end, we can have the
following four cases:
| mas_start == mas_end | mas_start < mas_end
---------------+----------------------+----------------------
mas_start == 0 | 1 | 2
---------------+----------------------+----------------------
mas_start != 0 | 3 | 4
We can see in all these four cases, i is always less than or equal to
mas_end after finish the loop:
Case 1: After assign pivot 0, i is set to 1, which is bigger than
mas_end 0. So it jumps to complete and skip the check.
Case 2: After assign pivot 0, i is set to 1.
∵ (mas_start < mas_end) && (mas_start == 0)
==> (1 <= mas_end)
∵ (i == 1) && (1 <= mas_end)
==> (i <= mas_end)
∴ Before loop, we have (i <= mas_end). And we still hold this
if it skips the loop. For example, (i == mas_end).
Now let's see what happens in the loop:
∵ piv_end = min(mas_end, mt_pivots[mt])
==> (piv_end <= mas_end)
∵ loop condition is (i < piv_end)
==> (i <= piv_end) on finish the loop both normally or break
∵ (i <= piv_end) && (piv_end <= mas_end)
==> (i <= mas_end)
∴ After loop, we still get (i <= mas_end) in this case
Case 3: This case would skip both if clause and loop. So when it comes
to the check, i is still mas_start which equals to mas_end.
Case 4: This case would skip the if clause.
∵ (mas_start < mas_end) && (i == mas_start)
==> (i < mas_end)
∴ Before loop, we have (i < mas_end).
The loop process is similar with Case 2, so we get the same
result.
Now we can conclude in all cases, we get (i <= mas_end) when doing
check. Then it is not necessary to do the check.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240911142759.20989-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240911142759.20989-2-richard.weiyang@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "maple_tree: correct tree corruption on spanning store", v3.
There has been a nasty yet subtle maple tree corruption bug that appears
to have been in existence since the inception of the algorithm.
This bug seems far more likely to happen since commit f8d112a4e6
("mm/mmap: avoid zeroing vma tree in mmap_region()"), which is the point
at which reports started to be submitted concerning this bug.
We were made definitely aware of the bug thanks to the kind efforts of
Bert Karwatzki who helped enormously in my being able to track this down
and identify the cause of it.
The bug arises when an attempt is made to perform a spanning store across
two leaf nodes, where the right leaf node is the rightmost child of the
shared parent, AND the store completely consumes the right-mode node.
This results in mas_wr_spanning_store() mitakenly duplicating the new and
existing entries at the maximum pivot within the range, and thus maple
tree corruption.
The fix patch corrects this by detecting this scenario and disallowing the
mistaken duplicate copy.
The fix patch commit message goes into great detail as to how this occurs.
This series also includes a test which reliably reproduces the issue, and
asserts that the fix works correctly.
Bert has kindly tested the fix and confirmed it resolved his issues. Also
Mikhail Gavrilov kindly reported what appears to be precisely the same
bug, which this fix should also resolve.
This patch (of 2):
There has been a subtle bug present in the maple tree implementation from
its inception.
This arises from how stores are performed - when a store occurs, it will
overwrite overlapping ranges and adjust the tree as necessary to
accommodate this.
A range may always ultimately span two leaf nodes. In this instance we
walk the two leaf nodes, determine which elements are not overwritten to
the left and to the right of the start and end of the ranges respectively
and then rebalance the tree to contain these entries and the newly
inserted one.
This kind of store is dubbed a 'spanning store' and is implemented by
mas_wr_spanning_store().
In order to reach this stage, mas_store_gfp() invokes
mas_wr_preallocate(), mas_wr_store_type() and mas_wr_walk() in turn to
walk the tree and update the object (mas) to traverse to the location
where the write should be performed, determining its store type.
When a spanning store is required, this function returns false stopping at
the parent node which contains the target range, and mas_wr_store_type()
marks the mas->store_type as wr_spanning_store to denote this fact.
When we go to perform the store in mas_wr_spanning_store(), we first
determine the elements AFTER the END of the range we wish to store (that
is, to the right of the entry to be inserted) - we do this by walking to
the NEXT pivot in the tree (i.e. r_mas.last + 1), starting at the node we
have just determined contains the range over which we intend to write.
We then turn our attention to the entries to the left of the entry we are
inserting, whose state is represented by l_mas, and copy these into a 'big
node', which is a special node which contains enough slots to contain two
leaf node's worth of data.
We then copy the entry we wish to store immediately after this - the copy
and the insertion of the new entry is performed by mas_store_b_node().
After this we copy the elements to the right of the end of the range which
we are inserting, if we have not exceeded the length of the node (i.e.
r_mas.offset <= r_mas.end).
Herein lies the bug - under very specific circumstances, this logic can
break and corrupt the maple tree.
Consider the following tree:
Height
0 Root Node
/ \
pivot = 0xffff / \ pivot = ULONG_MAX
/ \
1 A [-----] ...
/ \
pivot = 0x4fff / \ pivot = 0xffff
/ \
2 (LEAVES) B [-----] [-----] C
^--- Last pivot 0xffff.
Now imagine we wish to store an entry in the range [0x4000, 0xffff] (note
that all ranges expressed in maple tree code are inclusive):
1. mas_store_gfp() descends the tree, finds node A at <=0xffff, then
determines that this is a spanning store across nodes B and C. The mas
state is set such that the current node from which we traverse further
is node A.
2. In mas_wr_spanning_store() we try to find elements to the right of pivot
0xffff by searching for an index of 0x10000:
- mas_wr_walk_index() invokes mas_wr_walk_descend() and
mas_wr_node_walk() in turn.
- mas_wr_node_walk() loops over entries in node A until EITHER it
finds an entry whose pivot equals or exceeds 0x10000 OR it
reaches the final entry.
- Since no entry has a pivot equal to or exceeding 0x10000, pivot
0xffff is selected, leading to node C.
- mas_wr_walk_traverse() resets the mas state to traverse node C. We
loop around and invoke mas_wr_walk_descend() and mas_wr_node_walk()
in turn once again.
- Again, we reach the last entry in node C, which has a pivot of
0xffff.
3. We then copy the elements to the left of 0x4000 in node B to the big
node via mas_store_b_node(), and insert the new [0x4000, 0xffff] entry
too.
4. We determine whether we have any entries to copy from the right of the
end of the range via - and with r_mas set up at the entry at pivot
0xffff, r_mas.offset <= r_mas.end, and then we DUPLICATE the entry at
pivot 0xffff.
5. BUG! The maple tree is corrupted with a duplicate entry.
This requires a very specific set of circumstances - we must be spanning
the last element in a leaf node, which is the last element in the parent
node.
spanning store across two leaf nodes with a range that ends at that shared
pivot.
A potential solution to this problem would simply be to reset the walk
each time we traverse r_mas, however given the rarity of this situation it
seems that would be rather inefficient.
Instead, this patch detects if the right hand node is populated, i.e. has
anything we need to copy.
We do so by only copying elements from the right of the entry being
inserted when the maximum value present exceeds the last, rather than
basing this on offset position.
The patch also updates some comments and eliminates the unused bool return
value in mas_wr_walk_index().
The work performed in commit f8d112a4e6 ("mm/mmap: avoid zeroing vma
tree in mmap_region()") seems to have made the probability of this event
much more likely, which is the point at which reports started to be
submitted concerning this bug.
The motivation for this change arose from Bert Karwatzki's report of
encountering mm instability after the release of kernel v6.12-rc1 which,
after the use of CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_MAPLE_TREE and similar configuration
options, was identified as maple tree corruption.
After Bert very generously provided his time and ability to reproduce this
event consistently, I was able to finally identify that the issue
discussed in this commit message was occurring for him.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/cover.1728314402.git.lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/48b349a2a0f7c76e18772712d0997a5e12ab0a3b.1728314403.git.lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com
Fixes: 54a611b605 ("Maple Tree: add new data structure")
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Reported-by: Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@web.de>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241001023402.3374-1-spasswolf@web.de/
Tested-by: Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@web.de>
Reported-by: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CABXGCsOPwuoNOqSMmAvWO2Fz4TEmPnjFj-b7iF+XFRu1h7-+Dg@mail.gmail.com/
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
Tested-by: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
