[Why]
Code reading rxstatus message size was incorrectly assigning it to
uint8_t, despite the value being 10 bits long (lower byte plus lowest
2 bits from upper byte). This caused the highest 2 bits to be ignored,
potentially missing invalid values.
[How]
Change all local variables holding rxstatus message size from uint8_t
to uint16_t, as in mod_hdcp_message_hdcp2::rx_id_list_size.
Replaced untyped HDCP_2_2_HMID_RXSTATUS_MSG_SZ_HI macro with function
hdcp_2_2_hmid_rxstatus_msg_sz(const uint8_t[2]) to encapsulate entire
calculation and return a typed result.
Removed spaces mixed with tabs to fix indentation on modified lines.
Reviewed-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dominik Kaszewski <dominik.kaszewski@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Zaeem Mohamed <zaeem.mohamed@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
calculate_user_regamma_coeff() and calculate_user_regamma_ramp() were
added in 2018 in commit
55a01d4023 ("drm/amd/display: Add user_regamma to color module")
but never used.
Remove them and their helpers.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <linux@treblig.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
When Source extend the vblank to reach the minimum panel
refresh rate, the vtotal length could have 1 line longer
than the maximum supported vtotal.
The reason is we optimized the vtotal/refresh-rate calculation
to get more accurate vtotal number by rounding the calculation
result. But when the target refresh rate is the minimum
refresh rate, the vtotal result could be round up and over
the maximum supported vtotal.
Reviewed-by: Anthony Koo <anthony.koo@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: po-tchen <robin.chen@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigo.siqueira@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This just standardizes the use of MIN() and MAX() macros, with the very
traditional semantics. The goal is to use these for C constant
expressions and for top-level / static initializers, and so be able to
simplify the min()/max() macros.
These macro names were used by various kernel code - they are very
traditional, after all - and all such users have been fixed up, with a
few different approaches:
- trivial duplicated macro definitions have been removed
Note that 'trivial' here means that it's obviously kernel code that
already included all the major kernel headers, and thus gets the new
generic MIN/MAX macros automatically.
- non-trivial duplicated macro definitions are guarded with #ifndef
This is the "yes, they define their own versions, but no, the include
situation is not entirely obvious, and maybe they don't get the
generic version automatically" case.
- strange use case #1
A couple of drivers decided that the way they want to describe their
versioning is with
#define MAJ 1
#define MIN 2
#define DRV_VERSION __stringify(MAJ) "." __stringify(MIN)
which adds zero value and I just did my Alexander the Great
impersonation, and rewrote that pointless Gordian knot as
#define DRV_VERSION "1.2"
instead.
- strange use case #2
A couple of drivers thought that it's a good idea to have a random
'MIN' or 'MAX' define for a value or index into a table, rather than
the traditional macro that takes arguments.
These values were re-written as C enum's instead. The new
function-line macros only expand when followed by an open
parenthesis, and thus don't clash with enum use.
Happily, there weren't really all that many of these cases, and a lot of
users already had the pattern of using '#ifndef' guarding (or in one
case just using '#undef MIN') before defining their own private version
that does the same thing. I left such cases alone.
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
[WHAT & HOW]
Integer multiplies integer may overflow in context that expects an
expression of unsigned/siged long long (64 bits). This can be fixed
by casting integer to unsigned/siged long long to force 64 bits results.
This fixes 26 OVERFLOW_BEFORE_WIDEN issues reported by Coverity.
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Jerry Zuo <jerry.zuo@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Use of macro ARRAY_SIZE to calculate array size minimizes
the redundant code and improves code reusability.
./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/modules/hdcp/hdcp_ddc.c:164:45-46: WARNING: Use ARRAY_SIZE.
./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/modules/hdcp/hdcp_ddc.c:183:47-48: WARNING: Use ARRAY_SIZE.
./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/modules/hdcp/hdcp_ddc.c:237:45-46: WARNING: Use ARRAY_SIZE.
./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/modules/hdcp/hdcp_ddc.c:257:47-48: WARNING: Use ARRAY_SIZE.
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=9405
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHY]
mod_hdcp_execute_and_set returns (*status == MOD_HDCP_STATUS_SUCCESS).
When it return 0, it is guaranteed that status == MOD_HDCP_STATUS_SUCCESS
will be evaluated as false. Since now we are using goto out already, all 3
if (status == MOD_HDCP_STATUS_SUCCESS) clauses are guaranteed to enter.
Therefore we are removing the if statements due to redundancy.
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigo.siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHAT]
msg_id is used as an array index and it cannot be a negative value, and
therefore cannot be equal to MOD_HDCP_MESSAGE_ID_INVALID (-1).
[HOW]
Check whether msg_id is valid before reading and setting.
This fixes 4 OVERRUN issues reported by Coverity.
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigo.siqueira@amd.com>
Acked-by: Wayne Lin <wayne.lin@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
Enabling higher compiler warning levels results in many issues that can
be trivially resolved as well as some potentially critical issues.
[how]
Fix all compiler warnings found with various compilers and higher
warning levels. Primarily, potentially uninitialized variables and
unreachable code.
Reviewed-by: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com>
Acked-by: Roman Li <roman.li@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Aric Cyr <aric.cyr@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
