Files
linux/include/drm/drm_syncobj.h

137 lines
4.0 KiB
C
Raw Permalink Normal View History

/*
* Copyright © 2017 Red Hat
*
* Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
* copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
* to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation
* the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense,
* and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
* Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
*
* The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including the next
* paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the
* Software.
*
* THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
* IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL
* THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
* LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
* FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS
* IN THE SOFTWARE.
*
* Authors:
*
*/
#ifndef __DRM_SYNCOBJ_H__
#define __DRM_SYNCOBJ_H__
#include <linux/dma-fence.h>
#include <linux/dma-fence-chain.h>
struct drm_file;
/**
* struct drm_syncobj - sync object.
*
drm: Revert syncobj timeline changes. Daniel suggested I submit this, since we're still seeing regressions from it. This is a revert to before 48197bc564c7 ("drm: add syncobj timeline support v9") and its followon fixes. Fixes this on first V3D testcase execution: [ 48.767088] ============================================ [ 48.772410] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [ 48.777739] 4.19.0-rc6+ #489 Not tainted [ 48.781668] -------------------------------------------- [ 48.786993] shader_runner/3284 is trying to acquire lock: [ 48.792408] ce309d7f (&(&array->lock)->rlock){....}, at: dma_fence_add_callback+0x30/0x23c [ 48.800714] [ 48.800714] but task is already holding lock: [ 48.806559] c5952bd3 (&(&array->lock)->rlock){....}, at: dma_fence_add_callback+0x30/0x23c [ 48.814862] [ 48.814862] other info that might help us debug this: [ 48.821410] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 48.821410] [ 48.827338] CPU0 [ 48.829788] ---- [ 48.832239] lock(&(&array->lock)->rlock); [ 48.836434] lock(&(&array->lock)->rlock); [ 48.840640] [ 48.840640] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 48.840640] [ 48.846582] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 130.763560] 1 lock held by cts-runner/3270: [ 130.767745] #0: 7834b793 (&(&array->lock)->rlock){-...}, at: dma_fence_add_callback+0x30/0x23c [ 130.776461] stack backtrace: [ 130.780825] CPU: 1 PID: 3270 Comm: cts-runner Not tainted 4.19.0-rc6+ #486 [ 130.787706] Hardware name: Broadcom STB (Flattened Device Tree) [ 130.793645] [<c021269c>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c020db1c>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 130.801404] [<c020db1c>] (show_stack) from [<c0c2c4b0>] (dump_stack+0xa8/0xd4) [ 130.808642] [<c0c2c4b0>] (dump_stack) from [<c0281a84>] (__lock_acquire+0x848/0x1a68) [ 130.816483] [<c0281a84>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c02835d8>] (lock_acquire+0xd8/0x22c) [ 130.824326] [<c02835d8>] (lock_acquire) from [<c0c49948>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x54/0x68) [ 130.832777] [<c0c49948>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave) from [<c086bf54>] (dma_fence_add_callback+0x30/0x23c) [ 130.842183] [<c086bf54>] (dma_fence_add_callback) from [<c086d4c8>] (dma_fence_array_enable_signaling+0x58/0xec) [ 130.852371] [<c086d4c8>] (dma_fence_array_enable_signaling) from [<c086c00c>] (dma_fence_add_callback+0xe8/0x23c) [ 130.862647] [<c086c00c>] (dma_fence_add_callback) from [<c06d8774>] (drm_syncobj_wait_ioctl+0x518/0x614) [ 130.872143] [<c06d8774>] (drm_syncobj_wait_ioctl) from [<c06b8458>] (drm_ioctl_kernel+0xb0/0xf0) [ 130.880940] [<c06b8458>] (drm_ioctl_kernel) from [<c06b8818>] (drm_ioctl+0x1d8/0x390) [ 130.888782] [<c06b8818>] (drm_ioctl) from [<c03a4510>] (do_vfs_ioctl+0xb0/0x8ac) [ 130.896187] [<c03a4510>] (do_vfs_ioctl) from [<c03a4d40>] (ksys_ioctl+0x34/0x60) [ 130.903593] [<c03a4d40>] (ksys_ioctl) from [<c0201000>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x28) Cc: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/261044/
2018-11-08 08:04:22 -08:00
* This structure defines a generic sync object which wraps a &dma_fence.
*/
struct drm_syncobj {
/**
* @refcount: Reference count of this object.
*/
struct kref refcount;
/**
drm: Revert syncobj timeline changes. Daniel suggested I submit this, since we're still seeing regressions from it. This is a revert to before 48197bc564c7 ("drm: add syncobj timeline support v9") and its followon fixes. Fixes this on first V3D testcase execution: [ 48.767088] ============================================ [ 48.772410] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [ 48.777739] 4.19.0-rc6+ #489 Not tainted [ 48.781668] -------------------------------------------- [ 48.786993] shader_runner/3284 is trying to acquire lock: [ 48.792408] ce309d7f (&(&array->lock)->rlock){....}, at: dma_fence_add_callback+0x30/0x23c [ 48.800714] [ 48.800714] but task is already holding lock: [ 48.806559] c5952bd3 (&(&array->lock)->rlock){....}, at: dma_fence_add_callback+0x30/0x23c [ 48.814862] [ 48.814862] other info that might help us debug this: [ 48.821410] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 48.821410] [ 48.827338] CPU0 [ 48.829788] ---- [ 48.832239] lock(&(&array->lock)->rlock); [ 48.836434] lock(&(&array->lock)->rlock); [ 48.840640] [ 48.840640] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 48.840640] [ 48.846582] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 130.763560] 1 lock held by cts-runner/3270: [ 130.767745] #0: 7834b793 (&(&array->lock)->rlock){-...}, at: dma_fence_add_callback+0x30/0x23c [ 130.776461] stack backtrace: [ 130.780825] CPU: 1 PID: 3270 Comm: cts-runner Not tainted 4.19.0-rc6+ #486 [ 130.787706] Hardware name: Broadcom STB (Flattened Device Tree) [ 130.793645] [<c021269c>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c020db1c>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 130.801404] [<c020db1c>] (show_stack) from [<c0c2c4b0>] (dump_stack+0xa8/0xd4) [ 130.808642] [<c0c2c4b0>] (dump_stack) from [<c0281a84>] (__lock_acquire+0x848/0x1a68) [ 130.816483] [<c0281a84>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c02835d8>] (lock_acquire+0xd8/0x22c) [ 130.824326] [<c02835d8>] (lock_acquire) from [<c0c49948>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x54/0x68) [ 130.832777] [<c0c49948>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave) from [<c086bf54>] (dma_fence_add_callback+0x30/0x23c) [ 130.842183] [<c086bf54>] (dma_fence_add_callback) from [<c086d4c8>] (dma_fence_array_enable_signaling+0x58/0xec) [ 130.852371] [<c086d4c8>] (dma_fence_array_enable_signaling) from [<c086c00c>] (dma_fence_add_callback+0xe8/0x23c) [ 130.862647] [<c086c00c>] (dma_fence_add_callback) from [<c06d8774>] (drm_syncobj_wait_ioctl+0x518/0x614) [ 130.872143] [<c06d8774>] (drm_syncobj_wait_ioctl) from [<c06b8458>] (drm_ioctl_kernel+0xb0/0xf0) [ 130.880940] [<c06b8458>] (drm_ioctl_kernel) from [<c06b8818>] (drm_ioctl+0x1d8/0x390) [ 130.888782] [<c06b8818>] (drm_ioctl) from [<c03a4510>] (do_vfs_ioctl+0xb0/0x8ac) [ 130.896187] [<c03a4510>] (do_vfs_ioctl) from [<c03a4d40>] (ksys_ioctl+0x34/0x60) [ 130.903593] [<c03a4d40>] (ksys_ioctl) from [<c0201000>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x28) Cc: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/261044/
2018-11-08 08:04:22 -08:00
* @fence:
* NULL or a pointer to the fence bound to this object.
*
* This field should not be used directly. Use drm_syncobj_fence_get()
* and drm_syncobj_replace_fence() instead.
*/
drm: Revert syncobj timeline changes. Daniel suggested I submit this, since we're still seeing regressions from it. This is a revert to before 48197bc564c7 ("drm: add syncobj timeline support v9") and its followon fixes. Fixes this on first V3D testcase execution: [ 48.767088] ============================================ [ 48.772410] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [ 48.777739] 4.19.0-rc6+ #489 Not tainted [ 48.781668] -------------------------------------------- [ 48.786993] shader_runner/3284 is trying to acquire lock: [ 48.792408] ce309d7f (&(&array->lock)->rlock){....}, at: dma_fence_add_callback+0x30/0x23c [ 48.800714] [ 48.800714] but task is already holding lock: [ 48.806559] c5952bd3 (&(&array->lock)->rlock){....}, at: dma_fence_add_callback+0x30/0x23c [ 48.814862] [ 48.814862] other info that might help us debug this: [ 48.821410] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 48.821410] [ 48.827338] CPU0 [ 48.829788] ---- [ 48.832239] lock(&(&array->lock)->rlock); [ 48.836434] lock(&(&array->lock)->rlock); [ 48.840640] [ 48.840640] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 48.840640] [ 48.846582] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 130.763560] 1 lock held by cts-runner/3270: [ 130.767745] #0: 7834b793 (&(&array->lock)->rlock){-...}, at: dma_fence_add_callback+0x30/0x23c [ 130.776461] stack backtrace: [ 130.780825] CPU: 1 PID: 3270 Comm: cts-runner Not tainted 4.19.0-rc6+ #486 [ 130.787706] Hardware name: Broadcom STB (Flattened Device Tree) [ 130.793645] [<c021269c>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c020db1c>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 130.801404] [<c020db1c>] (show_stack) from [<c0c2c4b0>] (dump_stack+0xa8/0xd4) [ 130.808642] [<c0c2c4b0>] (dump_stack) from [<c0281a84>] (__lock_acquire+0x848/0x1a68) [ 130.816483] [<c0281a84>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c02835d8>] (lock_acquire+0xd8/0x22c) [ 130.824326] [<c02835d8>] (lock_acquire) from [<c0c49948>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x54/0x68) [ 130.832777] [<c0c49948>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave) from [<c086bf54>] (dma_fence_add_callback+0x30/0x23c) [ 130.842183] [<c086bf54>] (dma_fence_add_callback) from [<c086d4c8>] (dma_fence_array_enable_signaling+0x58/0xec) [ 130.852371] [<c086d4c8>] (dma_fence_array_enable_signaling) from [<c086c00c>] (dma_fence_add_callback+0xe8/0x23c) [ 130.862647] [<c086c00c>] (dma_fence_add_callback) from [<c06d8774>] (drm_syncobj_wait_ioctl+0x518/0x614) [ 130.872143] [<c06d8774>] (drm_syncobj_wait_ioctl) from [<c06b8458>] (drm_ioctl_kernel+0xb0/0xf0) [ 130.880940] [<c06b8458>] (drm_ioctl_kernel) from [<c06b8818>] (drm_ioctl+0x1d8/0x390) [ 130.888782] [<c06b8818>] (drm_ioctl) from [<c03a4510>] (do_vfs_ioctl+0xb0/0x8ac) [ 130.896187] [<c03a4510>] (do_vfs_ioctl) from [<c03a4d40>] (ksys_ioctl+0x34/0x60) [ 130.903593] [<c03a4d40>] (ksys_ioctl) from [<c0201000>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x28) Cc: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/261044/
2018-11-08 08:04:22 -08:00
struct dma_fence __rcu *fence;
/**
drm: Revert syncobj timeline changes. Daniel suggested I submit this, since we're still seeing regressions from it. This is a revert to before 48197bc564c7 ("drm: add syncobj timeline support v9") and its followon fixes. Fixes this on first V3D testcase execution: [ 48.767088] ============================================ [ 48.772410] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [ 48.777739] 4.19.0-rc6+ #489 Not tainted [ 48.781668] -------------------------------------------- [ 48.786993] shader_runner/3284 is trying to acquire lock: [ 48.792408] ce309d7f (&(&array->lock)->rlock){....}, at: dma_fence_add_callback+0x30/0x23c [ 48.800714] [ 48.800714] but task is already holding lock: [ 48.806559] c5952bd3 (&(&array->lock)->rlock){....}, at: dma_fence_add_callback+0x30/0x23c [ 48.814862] [ 48.814862] other info that might help us debug this: [ 48.821410] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 48.821410] [ 48.827338] CPU0 [ 48.829788] ---- [ 48.832239] lock(&(&array->lock)->rlock); [ 48.836434] lock(&(&array->lock)->rlock); [ 48.840640] [ 48.840640] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 48.840640] [ 48.846582] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 130.763560] 1 lock held by cts-runner/3270: [ 130.767745] #0: 7834b793 (&(&array->lock)->rlock){-...}, at: dma_fence_add_callback+0x30/0x23c [ 130.776461] stack backtrace: [ 130.780825] CPU: 1 PID: 3270 Comm: cts-runner Not tainted 4.19.0-rc6+ #486 [ 130.787706] Hardware name: Broadcom STB (Flattened Device Tree) [ 130.793645] [<c021269c>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c020db1c>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 130.801404] [<c020db1c>] (show_stack) from [<c0c2c4b0>] (dump_stack+0xa8/0xd4) [ 130.808642] [<c0c2c4b0>] (dump_stack) from [<c0281a84>] (__lock_acquire+0x848/0x1a68) [ 130.816483] [<c0281a84>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c02835d8>] (lock_acquire+0xd8/0x22c) [ 130.824326] [<c02835d8>] (lock_acquire) from [<c0c49948>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x54/0x68) [ 130.832777] [<c0c49948>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave) from [<c086bf54>] (dma_fence_add_callback+0x30/0x23c) [ 130.842183] [<c086bf54>] (dma_fence_add_callback) from [<c086d4c8>] (dma_fence_array_enable_signaling+0x58/0xec) [ 130.852371] [<c086d4c8>] (dma_fence_array_enable_signaling) from [<c086c00c>] (dma_fence_add_callback+0xe8/0x23c) [ 130.862647] [<c086c00c>] (dma_fence_add_callback) from [<c06d8774>] (drm_syncobj_wait_ioctl+0x518/0x614) [ 130.872143] [<c06d8774>] (drm_syncobj_wait_ioctl) from [<c06b8458>] (drm_ioctl_kernel+0xb0/0xf0) [ 130.880940] [<c06b8458>] (drm_ioctl_kernel) from [<c06b8818>] (drm_ioctl+0x1d8/0x390) [ 130.888782] [<c06b8818>] (drm_ioctl) from [<c03a4510>] (do_vfs_ioctl+0xb0/0x8ac) [ 130.896187] [<c03a4510>] (do_vfs_ioctl) from [<c03a4d40>] (ksys_ioctl+0x34/0x60) [ 130.903593] [<c03a4d40>] (ksys_ioctl) from [<c0201000>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x28) Cc: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/261044/
2018-11-08 08:04:22 -08:00
* @cb_list: List of callbacks to call when the &fence gets replaced.
*/
struct list_head cb_list;
/**
drm/syncobj: add IOCTL to register an eventfd Introduce a new DRM_IOCTL_SYNCOBJ_EVENTFD IOCTL which signals an eventfd from a syncobj. This is useful for Wayland compositors to handle wait-before-submit. Wayland clients can send a timeline point to the compositor before the point has materialized yet, then compositors can wait for the point to materialize via this new IOCTL. The existing DRM_IOCTL_SYNCOBJ_TIMELINE_WAIT IOCTL is not suitable because it blocks. Compositors want to integrate the wait with their poll(2)-based event loop. Requirements for new uAPI: - User-space patch: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wlroots/wlroots/-/merge_requests/4262 - IGT: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/igt-dev/2023-July/057893.html v2: - Wait for fence when flags is zero - Improve documentation (Pekka) - Rename IOCTL (Christian) - Fix typo in drm_syncobj_add_eventfd() (Christian) v3: - Link user-space + IGT patches - Add reference from overview docs v4: fix IOCTL number conflict with GETFB2 (Nicholas Choi, Vitaly Prosyak) Signed-off-by: Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Acked-by: Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@collabora.com> Cc: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Cc: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl> Cc: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org> Cc: James Jones <jajones@nvidia.com> Cc: Austin Shafer <ashafer@nvidia.com> Cc: Vitaly Prosyak <vprosyak@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230714111257.11940-1-contact@emersion.fr
2023-07-14 11:13:03 +00:00
* @ev_fd_list: List of registered eventfd.
*/
struct list_head ev_fd_list;
/**
* @lock: Protects &cb_list and &ev_fd_list, and write-locks &fence.
*/
drm: Revert syncobj timeline changes. Daniel suggested I submit this, since we're still seeing regressions from it. This is a revert to before 48197bc564c7 ("drm: add syncobj timeline support v9") and its followon fixes. Fixes this on first V3D testcase execution: [ 48.767088] ============================================ [ 48.772410] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [ 48.777739] 4.19.0-rc6+ #489 Not tainted [ 48.781668] -------------------------------------------- [ 48.786993] shader_runner/3284 is trying to acquire lock: [ 48.792408] ce309d7f (&(&array->lock)->rlock){....}, at: dma_fence_add_callback+0x30/0x23c [ 48.800714] [ 48.800714] but task is already holding lock: [ 48.806559] c5952bd3 (&(&array->lock)->rlock){....}, at: dma_fence_add_callback+0x30/0x23c [ 48.814862] [ 48.814862] other info that might help us debug this: [ 48.821410] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 48.821410] [ 48.827338] CPU0 [ 48.829788] ---- [ 48.832239] lock(&(&array->lock)->rlock); [ 48.836434] lock(&(&array->lock)->rlock); [ 48.840640] [ 48.840640] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 48.840640] [ 48.846582] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 130.763560] 1 lock held by cts-runner/3270: [ 130.767745] #0: 7834b793 (&(&array->lock)->rlock){-...}, at: dma_fence_add_callback+0x30/0x23c [ 130.776461] stack backtrace: [ 130.780825] CPU: 1 PID: 3270 Comm: cts-runner Not tainted 4.19.0-rc6+ #486 [ 130.787706] Hardware name: Broadcom STB (Flattened Device Tree) [ 130.793645] [<c021269c>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c020db1c>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 130.801404] [<c020db1c>] (show_stack) from [<c0c2c4b0>] (dump_stack+0xa8/0xd4) [ 130.808642] [<c0c2c4b0>] (dump_stack) from [<c0281a84>] (__lock_acquire+0x848/0x1a68) [ 130.816483] [<c0281a84>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c02835d8>] (lock_acquire+0xd8/0x22c) [ 130.824326] [<c02835d8>] (lock_acquire) from [<c0c49948>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x54/0x68) [ 130.832777] [<c0c49948>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave) from [<c086bf54>] (dma_fence_add_callback+0x30/0x23c) [ 130.842183] [<c086bf54>] (dma_fence_add_callback) from [<c086d4c8>] (dma_fence_array_enable_signaling+0x58/0xec) [ 130.852371] [<c086d4c8>] (dma_fence_array_enable_signaling) from [<c086c00c>] (dma_fence_add_callback+0xe8/0x23c) [ 130.862647] [<c086c00c>] (dma_fence_add_callback) from [<c06d8774>] (drm_syncobj_wait_ioctl+0x518/0x614) [ 130.872143] [<c06d8774>] (drm_syncobj_wait_ioctl) from [<c06b8458>] (drm_ioctl_kernel+0xb0/0xf0) [ 130.880940] [<c06b8458>] (drm_ioctl_kernel) from [<c06b8818>] (drm_ioctl+0x1d8/0x390) [ 130.888782] [<c06b8818>] (drm_ioctl) from [<c03a4510>] (do_vfs_ioctl+0xb0/0x8ac) [ 130.896187] [<c03a4510>] (do_vfs_ioctl) from [<c03a4d40>] (ksys_ioctl+0x34/0x60) [ 130.903593] [<c03a4d40>] (ksys_ioctl) from [<c0201000>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x28) Cc: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/261044/
2018-11-08 08:04:22 -08:00
spinlock_t lock;
/**
* @file: A file backing for this syncobj.
*/
struct file *file;
};
void drm_syncobj_free(struct kref *kref);
/**
* drm_syncobj_get - acquire a syncobj reference
* @obj: sync object
*
* This acquires an additional reference to @obj. It is illegal to call this
* without already holding a reference. No locks required.
*/
static inline void
drm_syncobj_get(struct drm_syncobj *obj)
{
kref_get(&obj->refcount);
}
/**
* drm_syncobj_put - release a reference to a sync object.
* @obj: sync object.
*/
static inline void
drm_syncobj_put(struct drm_syncobj *obj)
{
kref_put(&obj->refcount, drm_syncobj_free);
}
drm: Revert syncobj timeline changes. Daniel suggested I submit this, since we're still seeing regressions from it. This is a revert to before 48197bc564c7 ("drm: add syncobj timeline support v9") and its followon fixes. Fixes this on first V3D testcase execution: [ 48.767088] ============================================ [ 48.772410] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [ 48.777739] 4.19.0-rc6+ #489 Not tainted [ 48.781668] -------------------------------------------- [ 48.786993] shader_runner/3284 is trying to acquire lock: [ 48.792408] ce309d7f (&(&array->lock)->rlock){....}, at: dma_fence_add_callback+0x30/0x23c [ 48.800714] [ 48.800714] but task is already holding lock: [ 48.806559] c5952bd3 (&(&array->lock)->rlock){....}, at: dma_fence_add_callback+0x30/0x23c [ 48.814862] [ 48.814862] other info that might help us debug this: [ 48.821410] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 48.821410] [ 48.827338] CPU0 [ 48.829788] ---- [ 48.832239] lock(&(&array->lock)->rlock); [ 48.836434] lock(&(&array->lock)->rlock); [ 48.840640] [ 48.840640] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 48.840640] [ 48.846582] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 130.763560] 1 lock held by cts-runner/3270: [ 130.767745] #0: 7834b793 (&(&array->lock)->rlock){-...}, at: dma_fence_add_callback+0x30/0x23c [ 130.776461] stack backtrace: [ 130.780825] CPU: 1 PID: 3270 Comm: cts-runner Not tainted 4.19.0-rc6+ #486 [ 130.787706] Hardware name: Broadcom STB (Flattened Device Tree) [ 130.793645] [<c021269c>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c020db1c>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 130.801404] [<c020db1c>] (show_stack) from [<c0c2c4b0>] (dump_stack+0xa8/0xd4) [ 130.808642] [<c0c2c4b0>] (dump_stack) from [<c0281a84>] (__lock_acquire+0x848/0x1a68) [ 130.816483] [<c0281a84>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c02835d8>] (lock_acquire+0xd8/0x22c) [ 130.824326] [<c02835d8>] (lock_acquire) from [<c0c49948>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x54/0x68) [ 130.832777] [<c0c49948>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave) from [<c086bf54>] (dma_fence_add_callback+0x30/0x23c) [ 130.842183] [<c086bf54>] (dma_fence_add_callback) from [<c086d4c8>] (dma_fence_array_enable_signaling+0x58/0xec) [ 130.852371] [<c086d4c8>] (dma_fence_array_enable_signaling) from [<c086c00c>] (dma_fence_add_callback+0xe8/0x23c) [ 130.862647] [<c086c00c>] (dma_fence_add_callback) from [<c06d8774>] (drm_syncobj_wait_ioctl+0x518/0x614) [ 130.872143] [<c06d8774>] (drm_syncobj_wait_ioctl) from [<c06b8458>] (drm_ioctl_kernel+0xb0/0xf0) [ 130.880940] [<c06b8458>] (drm_ioctl_kernel) from [<c06b8818>] (drm_ioctl+0x1d8/0x390) [ 130.888782] [<c06b8818>] (drm_ioctl) from [<c03a4510>] (do_vfs_ioctl+0xb0/0x8ac) [ 130.896187] [<c03a4510>] (do_vfs_ioctl) from [<c03a4d40>] (ksys_ioctl+0x34/0x60) [ 130.903593] [<c03a4d40>] (ksys_ioctl) from [<c0201000>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x28) Cc: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/261044/
2018-11-08 08:04:22 -08:00
/**
* drm_syncobj_fence_get - get a reference to a fence in a sync object
* @syncobj: sync object.
*
* This acquires additional reference to &drm_syncobj.fence contained in @obj,
* if not NULL. It is illegal to call this without already holding a reference.
* No locks required.
*
* Returns:
* Either the fence of @obj or NULL if there's none.
*/
static inline struct dma_fence *
drm_syncobj_fence_get(struct drm_syncobj *syncobj)
{
struct dma_fence *fence;
rcu_read_lock();
fence = dma_fence_get_rcu_safe(&syncobj->fence);
rcu_read_unlock();
return fence;
}
struct drm_syncobj *drm_syncobj_find(struct drm_file *file_private,
u32 handle);
void drm_syncobj_add_point(struct drm_syncobj *syncobj,
struct dma_fence_chain *chain,
struct dma_fence *fence,
uint64_t point);
void drm_syncobj_replace_fence(struct drm_syncobj *syncobj,
struct dma_fence *fence);
int drm_syncobj_find_fence(struct drm_file *file_private,
u32 handle, u64 point, u64 flags,
struct dma_fence **fence);
void drm_syncobj_free(struct kref *kref);
int drm_syncobj_create(struct drm_syncobj **out_syncobj, uint32_t flags,
struct dma_fence *fence);
int drm_syncobj_get_handle(struct drm_file *file_private,
struct drm_syncobj *syncobj, u32 *handle);
int drm_syncobj_get_fd(struct drm_syncobj *syncobj, int *p_fd);
#endif