Shell 2.2 spec defines =0x/=0X, =H/=h, =S, =L and =P for
hex number, hex array, ascii string, unicode string and
device path data.
The patch adds such support.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Chen A Chen <chen.a.chen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Cc: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
The patch doesn't impact the functionality.
The rename also fixes the inconsistency between function
header comments and function parameters.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
There are cases that the operands of an expression are all with rank less
than UINT64/INT64 and the result of the expression is explicitly cast to
UINT64/INT64 to fit the target size.
An example will be:
UINT32 a,b;
// a and b can be any unsigned int type with rank less than UINT64, like
// UINT8, UINT16, etc.
UINT64 c;
c = (UINT64) (a + b);
Some static code checkers may warn that the expression result might
overflow within the rank of "int" (integer promotions) and the result is
then cast to a bigger size.
The commit refines codes by the following rules:
1). When the expression is possible to overflow the range of unsigned int/
int:
c = (UINT64)a + b;
2). When the expression will not overflow within the rank of "int", remove
the explicit type casts:
c = a + b;
3). When the expression will be cast to pointer of possible greater size:
UINT32 a,b;
VOID *c;
c = (VOID *)(UINTN)(a + b); --> c = (VOID *)((UINTN)a + b);
4). When one side of a comparison expression contains only operands with
rank less than UINT32:
UINT8 a;
UINT16 b;
UINTN c;
if ((UINTN)(a + b) > c) {...} --> if (((UINT32)a + b) > c) {...}
For rule 4), if we remove the 'UINTN' type cast like:
if (a + b > c) {...}
The VS compiler will complain with warning C4018 (signed/unsigned
mismatch, level 3 warning) due to promoting 'a + b' to type 'int'.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
For pointer subtraction, the result is of type "ptrdiff_t". According to
the C11 standard (Committee Draft - April 12, 2011):
"When two pointers are subtracted, both shall point to elements of the
same array object, or one past the last element of the array object; the
result is the difference of the subscripts of the two array elements. The
size of the result is implementation-defined, and its type (a signed
integer type) is ptrdiff_t defined in the <stddef.h> header. If the result
is not representable in an object of that type, the behavior is
undefined."
In our codes, there are cases that the pointer subtraction is not
performed by pointers to elements of the same array object. This might
lead to potential issues, since the behavior is undefined according to C11
standard.
Also, since the size of type "ptrdiff_t" is implementation-defined. Some
static code checkers may warn that the pointer subtraction might underflow
first and then being cast to a bigger size. For example:
UINT8 *Ptr1, *Ptr2;
UINTN PtrDiff;
...
PtrDiff = (UINTN) (Ptr1 - Ptr2);
The commit will refine the pointer subtraction expressions by casting each
pointer to UINTN first and then perform the subtraction:
PtrDiff = (UINTN) Ptr1 - (UINTN) Ptr2;
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Type 0: Update "EDD Enhanced Disk Driver)..." to
"EDD (Enhanced Disk Driver)..." for
STR_SMBIOSVIEW_PRINTINFO_EDD_ENHANCED_DRIVER
Type 3: Use L" Laptop" instead of L" LapTop" in
SystemEnclosureTypeTable to match SMBIOS spec.
Type 10: The BIT7 of Device Type is representing the
status of device whether it is enabled or disabled.
But current code is not considering the BIT7 and will
print "Undefined Value" for enabled device. Type 41
has same definition of Device Type, the code is
correct and will be applied to Type 10 by this patch.
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Current PrintBitsInfo() will always print an additional trailing
" | " for the bit flags, for example,
Base Board Feature Flags: Hosting board | Replaceable |
Th patch is to eliminate trailing " | " in PrintBitsInfo(), then
the output will be like below
Base Board Feature Flags: Hosting board | Replaceable
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
The implementation was already there but through a private flag
"-_e". The patch removes "-_e" support and add "-ec" support.
Removing old "-_e" support makes the pci command more clean.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Added decoding of the new SMBIOS Type 43 record.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Augustine Linson P <linson.augustine@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
The smbiosview command was not displaying SMBIOS Type 3 Height, NumberofPowerCords, or SKU Number.
Added handling to display these values.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Chris Phillips <chrisp@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
The patch adds the "-sfo" support to "dmpstore" command.
When -l or -d is specified, -sfo is not supported.
When the variable specified by name and GUID cannot be found,
an error message is displayed; Otherwise, the SFO is displayed.
E.g.: "dmpstore -guid GuidThatDoesntExist -sfo" produces output
as:
ShellCommand,"dmpstore"
VariableInfo,"","GuidThatDoesntExist","","",""
"dmpstore NameThatDoesntExist -guid GuidThatDoesntExist -sfo"
produces output as:
ShellCommand,"dmpstore"
dmpstore: No matching variables found. Guid GuidThatDoesntExist, Name
NameThatDoesntExist
The difference between the above 2 cases is that former one only
specifies the GUID, but the latter one specifies both name and GUID.
Since not specifying GUID means to use GlobalVariableGuid,
"dmpstore NameThatDoesntExist -sfo" produces the similar output as
latter one.
I personally prefer to always produce SFO output for both cases.
But the above behavior is the discussion result between HPE engineers.
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen A Chen <chen.a.chen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tapan Shah <tapandshah@hpe.com>
Ruiyu Ni
Chen A Chen
Hao Wu
Star Zeng
Linson Augustine
Chris Phillips
Dandan Bi