Summary:
Add and instructions immediately after loads that only have their low
bits used, assuming that the (and (load x) c) will be matched as a
extload and the ands/truncs fed by the extload will be removed by isel.
Reviewers: mcrosier, qcolombet, ab
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14584
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@253722 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is another step towards allowing SimplifyCFG to speculate harder, but then have
CGP clean things up if the target doesn't like it.
Previous patches in this series:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12882http://reviews.llvm.org/D13297
D13297 should catch most expensive ops, but speculation of cttz/ctlz requires special
handling because of weirdness in the intrinsic definition for handling a zero input
(that definition can probably be blamed on x86).
For example, if we have the usual speculated-by-select expensive op pattern like this:
%tobool = icmp eq i64 %A, 0
%0 = tail call i64 @llvm.cttz.i64(i64 %A, i1 true) ; is_zero_undef == true
%cond = select i1 %tobool, i64 64, i64 %0
ret i64 %cond
There's an instcombine that will turn it into:
%0 = tail call i64 @llvm.cttz.i64(i64 %A, i1 false) ; is_zero_undef == false
This CGP patch is looking for that case and despeculating it back into:
entry:
%tobool = icmp eq i64 %A, 0
br i1 %tobool, label %cond.end, label %cond.true
cond.true:
%0 = tail call i64 @llvm.cttz.i64(i64 %A, i1 true) ; is_zero_undef == true
br label %cond.end
cond.end:
%cond = phi i64 [ %0, %cond.true ], [ 64, %entry ]
ret i64 %cond
This unfortunately may lead to poorer codegen (see the changes in the existing x86 test),
but if we increase speculation in SimplifyCFG (the next step in this patch series), then
we should avoid those kinds of cases in the first place.
The need for this patch was originally mentioned here:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D7506
with follow-up here:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D7554
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14630
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@253573 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Note, this was reviewed (and more details are in) http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20151109/312083.html
These intrinsics currently have an explicit alignment argument which is
required to be a constant integer. It represents the alignment of the
source and dest, and so must be the minimum of those.
This change allows source and dest to each have their own alignments
by using the alignment attribute on their arguments. The alignment
argument itself is removed.
There are a few places in the code for which the code needs to be
checked by an expert as to whether using only src/dest alignment is
safe. For those places, they currently take the minimum of src/dest
alignments which matches the current behaviour.
For example, code which used to read:
call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8* %dest, i8* %src, i32 500, i32 8, i1 false)
will now read:
call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8* align 8 %dest, i8* align 8 %src, i32 500, i1 false)
For out of tree owners, I was able to strip alignment from calls using sed by replacing:
(call.*llvm\.memset.*)i32\ [0-9]*\,\ i1 false\)
with:
$1i1 false)
and similarly for memmove and memcpy.
I then added back in alignment to test cases which needed it.
A similar commit will be made to clang which actually has many differences in alignment as now
IRBuilder can generate different source/dest alignments on calls.
In IRBuilder itself, a new argument was added. Instead of calling:
CreateMemCpy(Dst, Src, getInt64(Size), DstAlign, /* isVolatile */ false)
you now call
CreateMemCpy(Dst, Src, getInt64(Size), DstAlign, SrcAlign, /* isVolatile */ false)
There is a temporary class (IntegerAlignment) which takes the source alignment and rejects
implicit conversion from bool. This is to prevent isVolatile here from passing its default
parameter to the source alignment.
Note, changes in future can now be made to codegen. I didn't change anything here, but this
change should enable better memcpy code sequences.
Reviewed by Hal Finkel.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@253511 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a redo of r251849 except the tests have been split into arch-specific folders
to hopefully make the bots happy.
This is a follow-up from the discussion in D12965. The block-at-a-time limitation of
SelectionDAG also came up in D13297.
Without the InstCombine change from D12965, I don't expect this patch to make any
difference in the real world because InstCombine does not shrink cases like this in
visitSwitchInst(). But we need to have this CGP safety harness in place before
proceeding with any shrinkage in D12965, so we won't generate extra extends for compares.
I've opted for IR regression tests in the patch because that seems like a clearer way to
test the transform, but PowerPC CodeGen for an i16 widening test is shown below. x86
will need more work to solve: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22473
Before:
BB#0:
mr 4, 3
extsh. 3, 4
ble 0, .LBB0_5
BB#1:
cmpwi 3, 99
bgt 0, .LBB0_9
BB#2:
rlwinm 4, 4, 0, 16, 31 <--- 32-bit mask/extend
li 3, 0
cmplwi 4, 1
beqlr 0
BB#3:
cmplwi 4, 10
bne 0, .LBB0_12
BB#4:
li 3, 1
blr
.LBB0_5:
rlwinm 3, 4, 0, 16, 31 <--- 32-bit mask/extend
cmplwi 3, 65436
beq 0, .LBB0_13
BB#6:
cmplwi 3, 65526
beq 0, .LBB0_15
BB#7:
cmplwi 3, 65535
bne 0, .LBB0_12
BB#8:
li 3, 4
blr
.LBB0_9:
rlwinm 3, 4, 0, 16, 31 <--- 32-bit mask/extend
cmplwi 3, 100
beq 0, .LBB0_14
...
After:
BB#0:
rlwinm 4, 3, 0, 16, 31 <--- mask/extend to 32-bit and then use that for comparisons
cmpwi 4, 999
ble 0, .LBB0_5
BB#1:
lis 3, 0
ori 3, 3, 65525
cmpw 4, 3
bgt 0, .LBB0_9
BB#2:
cmplwi 4, 1000
beq 0, .LBB0_14
BB#3:
cmplwi 4, 65436
bne 0, .LBB0_13
BB#4:
li 3, 6
blr
.LBB0_5:
li 3, 0
cmplwi 4, 1
beqlr 0
BB#6:
cmplwi 4, 10
beq 0, .LBB0_12
BB#7:
cmplwi 4, 100
bne 0, .LBB0_13
BB#8:
li 3, 2
blr
.LBB0_9:
cmplwi 4, 65526
beq 0, .LBB0_15
BB#10:
cmplwi 4, 65535
bne 0, .LBB0_13
...
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13532
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251857 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a follow-up from the discussion in D12965. The block-at-a-time limitation of
SelectionDAG also came up in D13297.
Without the InstCombine change from D12965, I don't expect this patch to make any
difference in the real world because InstCombine does not shrink cases like this in
visitSwitchInst(). But we need to have this CGP safety harness in place before
proceeding with any shrinkage in D12965, so we won't generate extra extends for compares.
I've opted for IR regression tests in the patch because that seems like a clearer way to
test the transform, but PowerPC CodeGen for an i16 widening test is shown below. x86
will need more work to solve: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22473
Before:
BB#0:
mr 4, 3
extsh. 3, 4
ble 0, .LBB0_5
BB#1:
cmpwi 3, 99
bgt 0, .LBB0_9
BB#2:
rlwinm 4, 4, 0, 16, 31 <--- 32-bit mask/extend
li 3, 0
cmplwi 4, 1
beqlr 0
BB#3:
cmplwi 4, 10
bne 0, .LBB0_12
BB#4:
li 3, 1
blr
.LBB0_5:
rlwinm 3, 4, 0, 16, 31 <--- 32-bit mask/extend
cmplwi 3, 65436
beq 0, .LBB0_13
BB#6:
cmplwi 3, 65526
beq 0, .LBB0_15
BB#7:
cmplwi 3, 65535
bne 0, .LBB0_12
BB#8:
li 3, 4
blr
.LBB0_9:
rlwinm 3, 4, 0, 16, 31 <--- 32-bit mask/extend
cmplwi 3, 100
beq 0, .LBB0_14
...
After:
BB#0:
rlwinm 4, 3, 0, 16, 31 <--- mask/extend to 32-bit and then use that for comparisons
cmpwi 4, 999
ble 0, .LBB0_5
BB#1:
lis 3, 0
ori 3, 3, 65525
cmpw 4, 3
bgt 0, .LBB0_9
BB#2:
cmplwi 4, 1000
beq 0, .LBB0_14
BB#3:
cmplwi 4, 65436
bne 0, .LBB0_13
BB#4:
li 3, 6
blr
.LBB0_5:
li 3, 0
cmplwi 4, 1
beqlr 0
BB#6:
cmplwi 4, 10
beq 0, .LBB0_12
BB#7:
cmplwi 4, 100
bne 0, .LBB0_13
BB#8:
li 3, 2
blr
.LBB0_9:
cmplwi 4, 65526
beq 0, .LBB0_15
BB#10:
cmplwi 4, 65535
bne 0, .LBB0_13
...
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13532
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251849 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When the target does not support these intrinsics they should be converted to a chain of scalar load or store operations.
If the mask is not constant, the scalarizer will build a chain of conditional basic blocks.
I added isLegalMaskedGather() isLegalMaskedScatter() APIs.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13722
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251237 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This was originally checked in at r250527, but reverted at r250570 because of PR25222.
There were at least 2 problems:
1. The cost check was checking for an instruction with an exact cost of TCC_Expensive;
that should have been >=.
2. The cause of the clang stage 1 failures was illegally sinking 'call' instructions;
we can't sink instructions that may have side effects / are not safe to execute speculatively.
Fixed those conditions in sinkSelectOperand() and added test cases.
Original commit message:
This is a follow-up to the discussion in D12882.
Ideally, we would like SimplifyCFG to be able to form select instructions even when the operands
are expensive (as defined by the TTI cost model) because that may expose further optimizations.
However, we would then like a later pass like CodeGenPrepare to undo that transformation if the
target would likely benefit from not speculatively executing an expensive op (this patch).
Once we have this safety mechanism in place, we can adjust SimplifyCFG to restore its
select-formation behavior that changed with r248439.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13297
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@250743 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Originally I planned to use the same interface for masked gather/scatter and set isConsecutive to "false" in this case.
Now I'm implementing masked gather/scatter and see that the interface is inconvenient. I want to add interfaces isLegalMaskedGather() / isLegalMaskedScatter() instead of using the "Consecutive" parameter in the existing interfaces.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13850
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@250686 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Ideally, we would like SimplifyCFG to be able to form select instructions even when the operands
are expensive (as defined by the TTI cost model) because that may expose further optimizations.
However, we would then like a later pass like CodeGenPrepare to undo that transformation if the
target would likely benefit from not speculatively executing an expensive op (this patch).
Once we have this safety mechanism in place, we can adjust SimplifyCFG to restore its
select-formation behavior that changed with r248439.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13297
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@250527 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Reid Kleckner
Andrew Kaylor
Geoff Berry
Sanjay Patel
Pete Cooper
Igor Laevsky
Elena Demikhovsky
Rafael Espindola
Benjamin Kramer
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith