It is meant to be used to record modules @imported by the current
compile unit, so a debugger an import the same modules to replicate this
environment before dropping into the expression evaluator.
DIModule is a sibling to DINamespace and behaves quite similarly.
In addition to the name of the module it also records the module
configuration details that are necessary to uniquely identify the module.
This includes the configuration macros (e.g., -DNDEBUG), the include path
where the module.map file is to be found, and the isysroot.
The idea is that the backend will turn this into a DW_TAG_module.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D9614
rdar://problem/20965932
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@241017 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Having different code paths for streamed and regular bitcode reading was a
source of bugs in the past and this defines them away.
It has a small but noticeable impact on performance. I timed running
"opt -disable-output -disable-verify" on a ltoed clang. It goes from
14.752845231 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.16% )
to
15.012463721 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.11% )
Extracted from a patch by Karl Schimpf.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@240305 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The patch is generated using this command:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
llvm/lib/
Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@240137 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The personality routine currently lives in the LandingPadInst.
This isn't desirable because:
- All LandingPadInsts in the same function must have the same
personality routine. This means that each LandingPadInst beyond the
first has an operand which produces no additional information.
- There is ongoing work to introduce EH IR constructs other than
LandingPadInst. Moving the personality routine off of any one
particular Instruction and onto the parent function seems a lot better
than have N different places a personality function can sneak onto an
exceptional function.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10429
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@239940 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Without this the included unit test would assert in
assert(BasicBlockFwdRefs.empty() && "Unresolved blockaddress fwd references");
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@239871 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Before this patch the bitcode reader would read a module from a file
that contained in order:
* Any number of non MODULE_BLOCK sub blocks.
* One MODULE_BLOCK
* Any number of non MODULE_BLOCK sub blocks.
* 4 '\n' characters to handle OS X's ranlib.
Since we support lazy reading of modules, any information that is relevant
for the module has to be in the MODULE_BLOCK or before it. We don't gain
anything from checking what is after.
This patch then changes the reader to stop once the MODULE_BLOCK has been
successfully parsed.
This avoids the ugly special case for .bc files in an archive and makes it
easier to embed bitcode files.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@239845 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch adds the safe stack instrumentation pass to LLVM, which separates
the program stack into a safe stack, which stores return addresses, register
spills, and local variables that are statically verified to be accessed
in a safe way, and the unsafe stack, which stores everything else. Such
separation makes it much harder for an attacker to corrupt objects on the
safe stack, including function pointers stored in spilled registers and
return addresses. You can find more information about the safe stack, as
well as other parts of or control-flow hijack protection technique in our
OSDI paper on code-pointer integrity (http://dslab.epfl.ch/pubs/cpi.pdf)
and our project website (http://levee.epfl.ch).
The overhead of our implementation of the safe stack is very close to zero
(0.01% on the Phoronix benchmarks). This is lower than the overhead of
stack cookies, which are supported by LLVM and are commonly used today,
yet the security guarantees of the safe stack are strictly stronger than
stack cookies. In some cases, the safe stack improves performance due to
better cache locality.
Our current implementation of the safe stack is stable and robust, we
used it to recompile multiple projects on Linux including Chromium, and
we also recompiled the entire FreeBSD user-space system and more than 100
packages. We ran unit tests on the FreeBSD system and many of the packages
and observed no errors caused by the safe stack. The safe stack is also fully
binary compatible with non-instrumented code and can be applied to parts of
a program selectively.
This patch is our implementation of the safe stack on top of LLVM. The
patches make the following changes:
- Add the safestack function attribute, similar to the ssp, sspstrong and
sspreq attributes.
- Add the SafeStack instrumentation pass that applies the safe stack to all
functions that have the safestack attribute. This pass moves all unsafe local
variables to the unsafe stack with a separate stack pointer, whereas all
safe variables remain on the regular stack that is managed by LLVM as usual.
- Invoke the pass as the last stage before code generation (at the same time
the existing cookie-based stack protector pass is invoked).
- Add unit tests for the safe stack.
Original patch by Volodymyr Kuznetsov and others at the Dependable Systems
Lab at EPFL; updates and upstreaming by myself.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6094
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@239761 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Use the same argument names as the members.
Use default member initializes.
Extracted from a patch by Karl Schimpf.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@239749 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If the type isn't trivially moveable emplace can skip a potentially
expensive move. It also saves a couple of characters.
Call sites were found with the ASTMatcher + some semi-automated cleanup.
memberCallExpr(
argumentCountIs(1), callee(methodDecl(hasName("push_back"))),
on(hasType(recordDecl(has(namedDecl(hasName("emplace_back")))))),
hasArgument(0, bindTemporaryExpr(
hasType(recordDecl(hasNonTrivialDestructor())),
has(constructExpr()))),
unless(isInTemplateInstantiation()))
No functional change intended.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@238602 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
so DWARF skeleton CUs can be expression in IR. A skeleton CU is a
(typically empty) DW_TAG_compile_unit that has a DW_AT_(GNU)_dwo_name and
a DW_AT_(GNU)_dwo_id attribute. It is used to refer to external debug info.
This is a prerequisite for clang module debugging as discussed in
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2014-November/040076.html.
In order to refer to external types stored in split DWARF (dwo) objects,
such as clang modules, we need to emit skeleton CUs, which identify the
dwarf object (i.e., the clang module) by filename (the SplitDebugFilename)
and a hash value, the dwo_id.
This patch only contains the IR changes. The idea is that a CUs with a
non-zero dwo_id field will be emitted together with a DW_AT_GNU_dwo_name
and DW_AT_GNU_dwo_id attribute.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D9488
rdar://problem/20091852
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@237949 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Adrian Prantl
Alexander Kornienko
Rafael Espindola
David Majnemer
Peter Collingbourne
Yaron Keren
Filipe Cabecinhas
Benjamin Kramer
Owen Anderson