so DWARF skeleton CUs can be expression in IR. A skeleton CU is a
(typically empty) DW_TAG_compile_unit that has a DW_AT_(GNU)_dwo_name and
a DW_AT_(GNU)_dwo_id attribute. It is used to refer to external debug info.
This is a prerequisite for clang module debugging as discussed in
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2014-November/040076.html.
In order to refer to external types stored in split DWARF (dwo) objects,
such as clang modules, we need to emit skeleton CUs, which identify the
dwarf object (i.e., the clang module) by filename (the SplitDebugFilename)
and a hash value, the dwo_id.
This patch only contains the IR changes. The idea is that a CUs with a
non-zero dwo_id field will be emitted together with a DW_AT_GNU_dwo_name
and DW_AT_GNU_dwo_id attribute.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D9488
rdar://problem/20091852
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@237949 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Added isLoadableOrStorableType to PointerType.
We were doing some checks in some places, occasionally assert()ing instead
of telling the caller. With this patch, I'm putting all type checking in
the same place for load/store type instructions, and verifying the same
thing every time.
I also added a check for load/store of a function type.
Applied extracted check to Load, Store, and Cmpxcg.
I don't have exhaustive tests for all of these, but all Error() calls in
TypeCheckLoadStoreInst are being tested (in invalid.test).
Reviewers: dblaikie, rafael
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9785
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@237619 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Somehow I dropped this in r233585, and we haven't had `DEBUG_LOC_AGAIN`
records since. Add it back. Also tests that the output assembly looks
okay.
Fixes PR23436.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@236661 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
We don't seem to need to assert here, since this function's callers expect
to get a nullptr on error. This way we don't assert on user input.
Bug found with AFL fuzz.
Reviewers: rafael
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9308
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@236027 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
As a space optimization, this instruction would just encode the pointer
type of the first operand and use the knowledge that the second and
third operands would be of the pointee type of the first. When typed
pointers go away, this assumption will no longer be available - so
encode the type of the second operand explicitly and rely on that for
the third.
Test case added to demonstrate the backwards compatibility concern,
which only comes up when the definition of the second operand comes
after the use (hence the weird basic block sequence) - at which point
the type needs to be explicitly encoded in the bitcode and the record
length changes to accommodate this.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@235966 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8