Now that PointerType is no longer a SequentialType, all SequentialTypes
have an associated number of elements, so we can move that information to
the base class, allowing for a number of simplifications.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27122
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@288464 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
As proposed on llvm-dev:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-October/106640.html
This is for a couple of reasons:
- Values of type PointerType are unlike the other SequentialTypes (arrays
and vectors) in that they do not hold values of the element type. By moving
PointerType we can unify certain aspects of how the other SequentialTypes
are handled.
- PointerType will have no place in the SequentialType hierarchy once
pointee types are removed, so this is a necessary step towards removing
pointee types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26595
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@288462 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This introduces the basic functionality to support "token types".
The motivation stems from the need to perform operations on a Value
whose provenance cannot be obscured.
There are several applications for such a type but my immediate
motivation stems from WinEH. Our personality routine enforces a
single-entry - single-exit regime for cleanups. After several rounds of
optimizations, we may be left with a terminator whose "cleanup-entry
block" is not entirely clear because control flow has merged two
cleanups together. We have experimented with using labels as operands
inside of instructions which are not terminators to indicate where we
came from but found that LLVM does not expect such exotic uses of
BasicBlocks.
Instead, we can use this new type to clearly associate the "entry point"
and "exit point" of our cleanup. This is done by having the cleanuppad
yield a Token and consuming it at the cleanupret.
The token type makes it impossible to obscure or otherwise hide the
Value, making it trivial to track the relationship between the two
points.
What is the burden to the optimizer? Well, it turns out we have already
paid down this cost by accepting that there are certain calls that we
are not permitted to duplicate, optimizations have to watch out for
such instructions anyway. There are additional places in the optimizer
that we will probably have to update but early examination has given me
the impression that this will not be heroic.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11861
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@245029 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
As documented in the LLVM Coding Standards, indeed MSVC incorrectly asserts
on this in Debug mode. This happens when building clang with Visual C++ and
-triple i686-pc-windows-gnu on these clang regression tests:
clang/test/CodeGen/2011-03-08-ZeroFieldUnionInitializer.c
clang/test/CodeGen/empty-union-init.c
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@243996 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
contained types into the space when we have no contained types. This
fixes the UB stemming from a call to memcpy with a null pointer. This
also reduces the calls to allocate because this actually happens in
a notable client - Clang.
Found by UBSan.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@243944 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Added isLoadableOrStorableType to PointerType.
We were doing some checks in some places, occasionally assert()ing instead
of telling the caller. With this patch, I'm putting all type checking in
the same place for load/store type instructions, and verifying the same
thing every time.
I also added a check for load/store of a function type.
Applied extracted check to Load, Store, and Cmpxcg.
I don't have exhaustive tests for all of these, but all Error() calls in
TypeCheckLoadStoreInst are being tested (in invalid.test).
Reviewers: dblaikie, rafael
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9785
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@237619 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The i128 type is needed as a builtin type in order to support the v1i128 vector
type. The PowerPC ABI requires that the i128 and v1i128 types are handled
differently when passed as parameters to functions (i128 is passed in pairs of
GPRs, v1i128 is passed in a single vector register).
http://reviews.llvm.org/D8564
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@235196 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Apparently some code finally started to tickle this after my
canonicalization changes to instcombine.
The bug stems from trying to form a vector type out of scalars that
aren't compatible at all. In this example, from x86_mmx values. The code
in the vectorizer that checks for reasonable types whas checking for
aggregates or vectors, but there are lots of other types that should
just never reach the vectorizer.
Debugging this was made more confusing by the lie in an assert in
VectorType::get() -- it isn't that the types are *primitive*. The types
must be integer, pointer, or floating point types. No other types are
allowed.
I've improved the assert and added a helper to the vectorizer to handle
the element type validity checks. It now re-uses the VectorType static
function and then further excludes weird target-specific types that we
probably shouldn't be touching here (x86_fp80 and ppc_fp128). Neither of
these are really reachable anyways (neither 80-bit nor 128-bit things
will get vectorized) but it seems better to just eagerly exclude such
nonesense.
I've added a test case, but while it definitely covers two of the paths
through this code there may be more paths that would benefit from test
coverage. I'm not familiar enough with the SLP vectorizer to synthesize
test cases for all of these, but was able to update the code itself by
inspection.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@228899 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is to be consistent with StringSet and ultimately with the standard
library's associative container insert function.
This lead to updating SmallSet::insert to return pair<iterator, bool>,
and then to update SmallPtrSet::insert to return pair<iterator, bool>,
and then to update all the existing users of those functions...
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222334 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Having two ways to do this doesn't seem terribly helpful and
consistently using the insert version (which we already has) seems like
it'll make the code easier to understand to anyone working with standard
data structures. (I also updated many references to the Entry's
key and value to use first() and second instead of getKey{Data,Length,}
and get/setValue - for similar consistency)
Also removes the GetOrCreateValue functions so there's less surface area
to StringMap to fix/improve/change/accommodate move semantics, etc.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222319 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Make this conservatively correct and report false for different
address spaces, which might require a nontrivial translation.
Based on the few uses of this, I don't think this currently
breaks anything.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216846 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Peter Collingbourne
Benjamin Kramer
Sanjay Patel
Craig Topper
David Majnemer
Yaron Keren
Chandler Carruth
Nick Lewycky
Filipe Cabecinhas
Kit Barton
David Blaikie
Matt Arsenault