Summary:
While woring on mapping attributes in the C API, it clearly appeared that the recent changes in the API on the C++ side left Function and Call/Invoke with an attribute API that grew in an ad hoc manner. This makes it difficult to work with it, because one doesn't know which overloads exists and which do not.
Make sure that getter/setter function exists for both enum and string version. Remove inconsistent getter/setter, unless they have many callsites.
This should make it easier to work with attributes in the future.
This doesn't change how attribute works.
Reviewers: bkramer, whitequark, mehdi_amini, void
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21514
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@281019 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In order to make the optimizer smarter about using the 'returned' argument
attribute (generally, but motivated by my llvm.noalias intrinsic work), add a
utility function to Call/InvokeInst, and CallSite, to make it easy to get the
returned call argument (when one exists).
P.S. There is already an unfortunate amount of code duplication between
CallInst and InvokeInst, and this adds to it. We should probably clean that up
separately.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22204
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@275031 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We neglected to transfer operand bundles for some transforms. These
were found via inspection, I'll try to come up with some test cases.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@268011 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is part of solving PR27344:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27344
CGP should undo the SimplifyCFG transform for the same reason that earlier patches have used this
same mechanism: it's possible that passes between SimplifyCFG and CGP may be able to optimize the
IR further with a select in place.
For the TLI hook default, >99% taken or not taken is chosen as the default threshold for a highly
predictable branch. Even the most limited HW branch predictors will be correct on this branch almost
all the time, so even a massive mispredict penalty perf loss would be overcome by the win from all
the times the branch was predicted correctly.
As a follow-up, we could make the default target hook less conservative by using the SchedMachineModel's
MispredictPenalty. Or we could just let targets override the default by implementing the hook with that
and other target-specific options. Note that trying to statically determine mispredict rates for
close-to-balanced profile weight data is generally impossible if the HW is sufficiently advanced. Ie,
50/50 taken/not-taken might still be 100% predictable.
Finally, note that this patch as-is will not solve PR27344 because the current __builtin_unpredictable()
branch weight default values are 4 and 64. A proposal to change that is in D19435.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19488
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@267572 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
While we're here, fix the comment and variable names to make it
clear that these are raw weights, not percentages.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@267491 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: [u|s]gt and [u|s]lt imply [u|s]ge and [u|s]le are true, respectively.
I've simplified the existing tests and added additional tests to cover the new
cases mentioned above. I've also added tests for all the cases where the
first compare doesn't imply anything about the second compare.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@267171 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
EarlyCSE had inconsistent behavior with regards to flag'd instructions:
- In some cases, it would pessimize if the available instruction had
different flags by not performing CSE.
- In other cases, it would miscompile if it replaced an instruction
which had no flags with an instruction which has flags.
Fix this by being more consistent with our flag handling by utilizing
andIRFlags.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@267111 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
If a PHI has an incoming undef, we can pretend that it is equal to one
non-undef, non-self incoming value.
This is particularly relevant in combination with the StructurizeCFG
pass, which introduces PHI nodes with undefs. Previously, this lead to
branch conditions that were uniform before StructurizeCFG to become
non-uniform afterwards, which confused the SIAnnotateControlFlow
pass.
This fixes a crash when Mesa radeonsi compiles a shader from
dEQP-GLES3.functional.shaders.switch.switch_in_for_loop_dynamic_vertex
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, jingyue
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19013
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@266347 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
In the context of http://wg21.link/lwg2445 C++ uses the concept of
'stronger' ordering but doesn't define it properly. This should be fixed
in C++17 barring a small question that's still open.
The code currently plays fast and loose with the AtomicOrdering
enum. Using an enum class is one step towards tightening things. I later
also want to tighten related enums, such as clang's
AtomicOrderingKind (which should be shared with LLVM as a 'C++ ABI'
enum).
This change touches a few lines of code which can be improved later, I'd
like to keep it as NFC for now as it's already quite complex. I have
related changes for clang.
As a follow-up I'll add:
bool operator<(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator>(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator<=(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator>=(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
This is separate so that clang and LLVM changes don't need to be in sync.
Reviewers: jyknight, reames
Subscribers: jyknight, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18775
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@265602 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
A ``swifterror`` attribute can be applied to a function parameter or an
AllocaInst.
This commit does not include any target-specific change. The target-specific
optimization will come as a follow-up patch.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18092
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@265189 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Sanjay Patel
Peter Collingbourne
Sanjoy Das
Amaury Sechet
Xinliang David Li
Tim Northover
Hal Finkel
David Majnemer
Chad Rosier
Nicolai Haehnle
JF Bastien
Manman Ren