This broke some out-of-tree AMDGPU tests that relied on the old behavior
wherein isIntrinsic() would return true for any function that starts
with "llvm.". And in general that change will not play nicely with
out-of-tree backends.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@277087 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
getName() involves a hashtable lookup, so is expensive given how
frequently isIntrinsic() is called. (In particular, many users cast to
IntrinsicInstr or one of its subclasses before calling
getIntrinsicID().)
This has an incidental functional change: Before, isIntrinsic() would
return true for any function whose name started with "llvm.", even if it
wasn't properly an intrinsic. The new behavior seems more correct to
me, because it's strange to say that isIntrinsic() is true, but
getIntrinsicId() returns "not an intrinsic".
Some callers want the old behavior -- they want to know whether the
caller is a recognized intrinsic, or might be one in some other version
of LLVM. For them, we added Function::hasLLVMReservedName(), which
checks whether the name starts with "llvm.".
This change is good for a 1.5% e2e speedup compiling a large Eigen
benchmark.
Reviewers: bogner
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22065
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@276942 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
MSVC provide exception handlers with enhanced information to deal with security buffer feature (/GS).
To be more secure, the security cookies (GS and SEH) are validated when unwinding the stack.
The following code:
```
void f() {}
void foo() {
__try {
f();
} __except(1) {
f();
}
}
```
Reviewers: majnemer, rnk
Subscribers: thakis, llvm-commits, chrisha
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21101
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@274239 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
SimplifyCFG had logic to insert calls to llvm.trap for two very
particular IR patterns: stores and invokes of undef/null.
While InstCombine canonicalizes certain undefined behavior IR patterns
to stores of undef, phase ordering means that this cannot be relied upon
in general.
There are much better tools than llvm.trap: UBSan and ASan.
N.B. I could be argued into reverting this change if a clear argument as
to why it is important that we synthesize llvm.trap for stores, I'd be
hard pressed to see why it'd be useful for invokes...
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@273778 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Clarify what this RemapFlag actually means.
- Change the flag name to match its intended behaviour.
- Clearly document that it's not supposed to affect globals.
- Add a host of FIXMEs to indicate how to fix the behaviour to match
the intent of the flag.
RF_IgnoreMissingLocals should only affect the behaviour of
RemapInstruction for function-local operands; namely, for operands of
type Argument, Instruction, and BasicBlock. Currently, it is *only*
passed into RemapInstruction calls (and the transitive MapValue calls
that it makes).
When I split Metadata from Value I didn't understand the flag, and I
used it in a bunch of places for "global" metadata.
This commit doesn't have any functionality change, but prepares to
cleanup MapMetadata and MapValue.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@265628 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Inline-asm calls aren't annotated with funclet bundle operands because
they don't throw and cannot be inlined through. We shouldn't require
them to bear an funclet bundle operand.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@261942 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Those commits created an artificial edge from a cleanup to a synthesized
catchswitch in order to get the MSVC personality routine to execute
cleanups which don't cleanupret and are not wrapped by a catchswitch.
This worked well enough but is not a complete solution in situations
where there the cleanup infinite loops.
However, the real deal breaker behind this approach comes about from a
degenerate case where the cleanup is post-dominated by unreachable *and*
throws an exception. This ends poorly because the catchswitch will
inadvertently catch the exception.
Because of this we should go back to our previous behavior of not
executing certain cleanups (identical behavior with the Itanium ABI
implementation in clang, GCC and ICC).
N.B. I think this could be salvaged by making the catchpad rethrow the
exception and properly transforming throwing calls in the cleanup into
invokes.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@259338 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
A cleanup can have paths which unwind or end up in unreachable.
If there is an unreachable path *and* a path which unwinds to caller,
we would mistakenly inject an unwind path to a catchswitch on the
unreachable path. This results in a verifier assertion firing because
the cleanup unwinds to two different places: to the caller and to the
catchswitch.
This occured because we used getCleanupRetUnwindDest to determine if the
cleanuppad had no cleanuprets.
This is incorrect, getCleanupRetUnwindDest returns null for cleanuprets
which unwind to caller.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@258651 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Cleanups in C++ are a little weird. They are only guaranteed to be
reliably executed if, and only if, there is a viable catch handler which
can handle the exception.
This means that reachability of a cleanup is lexically determined by it
being nested with a try-block which unwinds to a catch. It is *cannot*
be reasoned about by examining the control flow edges leaving a cleanup.
Usually this is not a problem. It becomes a problem when there are *no*
edges out of a cleanup because we believed that code post-dominated by
the cleanup is dead. In LLVM's case, this code is what informs the
personality routine about the presence of a suitable catch handler.
However, the lack of edges to that catch handler makes the handler
become unreachable which causes us to remove it. By removing the
handler, the cleanup becomes unreachable.
Instead, inject a catch-all handler with every cleanup that has no
unwind edges. This will allow us to properly unwind the stack.
This fixes PR25997.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@258580 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Rename to getCatchSwitchParentPad, to make it more clear which ancestor
the "parent" in question is. Add a comment pointing out the key feature
that the returned pad indicates which funclet contains the successor
block.
Reviewers: rnk, andrew.w.kaylor, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16222
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@257933 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Windows EH keeping track of which frame index corresponds to a catchpad
in order to inform the runtime where the catch parameter should be
initialized. LLVM's optimizations are able to prove that the memory
used by the catch parameter can be reused with another memory
optimization, changing it's frame index.
We need to keep WinEHFuncInfo up to date with respect to this or we will
miscompile/assert.
This fixes PR26069.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@257158 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The functionality that calculateCatchReturnSuccessorColors provides was
once non-trivial: it was a computation layered on top of funclet
coloring.
These days, LLVM IR directly encodes what
calculateCatchReturnSuccessorColors computed, obsoleting the need for
it.
No functionality change is intended.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@256965 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Fix the CLR state numbering to generate correct tables, and update the lit
test to verify them.
The CLR numbering assigns one state number to each catchpad and
cleanuppad.
It also computes two tree-like relations over states:
1) Each state has a "HandlerParentState", which is the state of the next
outer handler enclosing this state's handler (same as nearest ancestor
per the ParentPad linkage on EH pads, but skipping over catchswitches).
2) Each state has a "TryParentState", which:
a) for a catchpad that's not the last handler on its catchswitch, is
the state of the next catchpad on that catchswitch.
b) for all other pads, is the state of the pad whose try region is the
next outer try region enclosing this state's try region. The "try
regions are not present as such in the IR, but will be inferred
based on the placement of invokes and pads which reach each other
by exceptional exits.
Catchswitches do not get their own states, but each gets mapped to the
state of its first catchpad.
Table generation requires each state's "unwind dest" state to have a lower
state number than the given state.
Since HandlerParentState can be computed as a function of a pad's
ParentPad, and TryParentState can be computed as a function of its unwind
dest and the TryParentStates of its children, the CLR state numbering
algorithm first computes HandlerParentState in a top-down pass, then
computes TryParentState in a bottom-up pass.
Also reword some comments/names in the CLR EH table generation to make the
distinction between the different kinds of "parent" clear.
Reviewers: rnk, andrew.w.kaylor, majnemer
Subscribers: AndyAyers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15325
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@256760 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Add a pass to update catchrets when their successors get cloned; the
existing pass doesn't catch these because it walks the funclet whose
blocks are being cloned but the catchret is in a child funclet.
Also update the test for removing incoming PHI values; when the
predecessor is a catchret, the relevant color is the catchret's parentPad,
not its block's color.
Reviewers: andrew.w.kaylor, rnk, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15840
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@256689 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Recolor the IR to make sure our computed colors are not hiding any bugs.
Also, verifyFunction if we are running some post-preparation operations;
some of these operations can hide latent bugs.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@256687 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
missing includes so that the pointee types for DenseMap pointer keys and
such are complete prior to us querying the pointer traits for them.
This is part of a series of patches to allow LLVM to check for complete
pointee types when computing its pointer traits. This is absolutely
necessary to get correct (or reproducible) results for things like how
many low bits are guaranteed to be zero.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@256550 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We visited the same catchswitch twice because it was both the child of
another funclet and the predecessor of a cleanuppad.
Instead, change the numbering algorithm to only recurse if the unwind
destination of the inner funclet agrees with the unwind destination of
the catchswitch.
This fixes PR25926.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@256317 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Andrew Kaylor
Simon Pilgrim
Mehdi Amini
Justin Lebar
Etienne Bergeron
David Majnemer
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
Joseph Tremoulet
NAKAMURA Takumi
Chandler Carruth