This fallthrough if other cases are added between fabs and default
could cause fabs to fall to the next case resulting in a bug.
Better getting rid of it immediately just to be sure.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@292003 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
After r289755, the AssumptionCache is no longer needed. Variables affected by
assumptions are now found by using the new operand-bundle-based scheme. This
new scheme is more computationally efficient, and also we need much less
code...
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@289756 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
As Eli noted in the post-commit thread for r288833, the use of
swapOperands() may not be allowed in InstSimplify, so I'm
removing those calls here pending further review.
The swap mutates the icmp, and there doesn't appear to be precedent
for instruction mutation in InstSimplify.
I didn't actually have any tests for those cases, so I'm adding
a few here.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@288855 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
All of these (and a few more) are already handled by InstCombine,
but we shouldn't have to wait until then to simplify these because
they're cheap to deal with here in InstSimplify.
This is the 'and' sibling of the earlier 'or' patch:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL288833
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@288841 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
All of these (and a few more) are already handled by InstCombine,
but we shouldn't have to wait until then to simplify these because
they're cheap to deal with here in InstSimplify.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@288833 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Note that the non-splat lshr+lshr test folded, but that does not
work in general. Something is missing or wrong in computeKnownBits
as the non-splat shl+shl test still shows.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@288005 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
0 - X --> X, if X is 0 or the minimum signed value
0 - X --> 0, if X is 0 or the minimum signed value and the sub is NSW
I noticed this pattern might be created in the backend after the change from D25485,
so we'll want to add a similar fold for the DAG.
The use of computeKnownBits in InstSimplify may be something to investigate if the
compile time of InstSimplify is noticeable. We could replace computeKnownBits with
specific pattern matchers or limit the recursion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25785
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@284649 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We don't need to call `GetCompareTy(LHS)' every single time true or false is
returned from function SimplifyFCmpInst as suggested by Sanjay in review D24142.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@280491 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch fixes a crash caused by an incorrect folding of an ordered comparison
between a packed floating point vector and a splat vector of NaN.
An ordered comparison between a vector and a constant vector of NaN, should
always be folded into a constant vector where each element is i1 false.
Since revision 266175, SimplifyFCmpInst folds the ordered fcmp into a scalar
'false'. Later on, this would cause an assertion failure, since the value type
of the folded value doesn't match the expected value type of the uses of the
original instruction: "Assertion failed: New->getType() == getType() &&
"replaceAllUses of value with new value of different type!".
This patch fixes the issue and adds a test case to the already existing test
InstSimplify/floating-point-compares.ll.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24143
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@280488 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Sanjay Patel
Marcello Maggioni
Matt Arsenault
David Majnemer
Daniel Jasper
Hal Finkel
Zia Ansari
Sanjoy Das
Andrea Di Biagio