From 0a0633e551eb5596c480dd66d0ade38783dfdcaf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: pstef <3462925+pstef@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2026 08:11:58 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] EE: the multiply predicate is one instruction, not three

Parking the mask in d10 removed the Mov/Fmov that materialised it. The
boundary term's instruction-count comparison, a few lines below, was
never updated to match.
---
 pcsx2/arm64/iFPUd-arm64.cpp | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/pcsx2/arm64/iFPUd-arm64.cpp b/pcsx2/arm64/iFPUd-arm64.cpp
index 6c799a78c8..3836b7b136 100644
--- a/pcsx2/arm64/iFPUd-arm64.cpp
+++ b/pcsx2/arm64/iFPUd-arm64.cpp
@@ -567,7 +567,7 @@ static void recFPUOp(int info, int eeRecDst, int op /*0=add,1=sub*/, bool acc)
 // one-directional (it can only miss a deficit, never invent one) and rare in
 // general operand space, per the count above. The term needs a bitfield extract
 // NEON has no equivalent for, so it has to go through GPRs and come back --
-// sketched at ten instructions against this predicate's three.
+// sketched at ten instructions against this predicate's one.
 // The resulting interpreter divergence is pinned by
 // EeRecFpuFull.MulDefectDropsTheBoundaryTermTheInterpreterModels.
 //