According to the TCG specifications measurements or hashes of the BIOS code
and data are extended into TPM PCRS and a log is kept in an ACPI table of
these extensions for later validation if desired. This patch exports the
values in the ACPI table through a security-fs seq_file.
Signed-off-by: Seiji Munetoh <munetoh@jp.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Reiner Sailer <sailer@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kylene Hall <kjhall@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Leave the overloaded "hotplug" word to susbsystems which are handling
real devices. The driver core does not "plug" anything, it just exports
the state to userspace and generates events.
Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
This is an interim patch until changes in an updated
ACPICA core increase the limit to 255.
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This has been broken for months. On resume, we call acpi_pci_link_set()
with interrupts off, so we get a warning when we try to do a kmalloc of non
atomic memory. The actual allocation is just 2 long's (plus extra byte for
some reason I can't fathom), so a simple conversion to GFP_ATOMIC is
probably the safest way to fix this.
The error looks like this..
Debug: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.c:2486
in_atomic():0, irqs_disabled():1
[<c0143f6c>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x40/0x56
[<c0206a2e>] acpi_pci_link_set+0x3f/0x17f
[<c0206f96>] irqrouter_resume+0x1e/0x3c
[<c0239bca>] __sysdev_resume+0x11/0x6b
[<c0239e88>] sysdev_resume+0x34/0x52
[<c023de21>] device_power_up+0x5/0xa
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: "Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Commit 64c7c8f885 broke the ACPI C2 and C3
sleep states, because it left TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG active even though
those states do not actually poll the reschedule flag at all. As a
result, the CPU wouldn't get sent an IPI when it was to be woken up, and
would only notice that it had runnable processes on the next timer tick.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
(cherry picked from ef4611613657dfb8af8d336f2f61f08cfcdc9d8a commit)
