Since we have at least one user of this function outside of CONFIG_NET
scope, we have to provide this function independently. The proposed
solution is to move it under lib/net_utils.c with corresponding
configuration variable and select wherever it is needed.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The umul_ppmm() macro for parisc uses the xmpyu assembler statement
which does calculation via a floating point register.
But usage of floating point registers inside the Linux kernel are not
allowed and gcc will stop compilation due to the -mdisable-fpregs
compiler option.
Fix this by disabling the umul_ppmm() and udiv_qrnnd() macros. The
mpilib will then use the generic built-in implementations instead.
Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Pull driver core fixes from Greg Kroah-Hartman:
"Here are 3 tiny driver core fixes for 3.10-rc2.
A needed symbol export, a change to make it easier to track down
offending sysfs files with incorrect attributes, and a klist bugfix.
All have been in linux-next for a while"
* tag 'driver-core-3.10-rc2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core:
klist: del waiter from klist_remove_waiters before wakeup waitting process
driver core: print sysfs attribute name when warning about bogus permissions
driver core: export subsys_virtual_register
There is a race between klist_remove and klist_release. klist_remove
uses a local var waiter saved on stack. When klist_release calls
wake_up_process(waiter->process) to wake up the waiter, waiter might run
immediately and reuse the stack. Then, klist_release calls
list_del(&waiter->list) to change previous
wait data and cause prior waiter thread corrupt.
The patch fixes it against kernel 3.9.
Signed-off-by: wang, biao <biao.wang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ERROR: "memcpy_fromiovec" [drivers/vhost/vhost_scsi.ko] undefined!
That function is only present with CONFIG_NET. Turns out that
crypto/algif_skcipher.c also uses that outside net, but it actually
needs sockets anyway.
In addition, commit 6d4f0139d6 added
CONFIG_NET dependency to CONFIG_VMCI for memcpy_toiovec, so hoist
that function and revert that commit too.
socket.h already includes uio.h, so no callers need updating; trying
only broke things fo x86_64 randconfig (thanks Fengguang!).
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Pull block driver updates from Jens Axboe:
"It might look big in volume, but when categorized, not a lot of
drivers are touched. The pull request contains:
- mtip32xx fixes from Micron.
- A slew of drbd updates, this time in a nicer series.
- bcache, a flash/ssd caching framework from Kent.
- Fixes for cciss"
* 'for-3.10/drivers' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block: (66 commits)
bcache: Use bd_link_disk_holder()
bcache: Allocator cleanup/fixes
cciss: bug fix to prevent cciss from loading in kdump crash kernel
cciss: add cciss_allow_hpsa module parameter
drivers/block/mg_disk.c: add CONFIG_PM_SLEEP to suspend/resume functions
mtip32xx: Workaround for unaligned writes
bcache: Make sure blocksize isn't smaller than device blocksize
bcache: Fix merge_bvec_fn usage for when it modifies the bvm
bcache: Correctly check against BIO_MAX_PAGES
bcache: Hack around stuff that clones up to bi_max_vecs
bcache: Set ra_pages based on backing device's ra_pages
bcache: Take data offset from the bdev superblock.
mtip32xx: mtip32xx: Disable TRIM support
mtip32xx: fix a smatch warning
bcache: Disable broken btree fuzz tester
bcache: Fix a format string overflow
bcache: Fix a minor memory leak on device teardown
bcache: Documentation updates
bcache: Use WARN_ONCE() instead of __WARN()
bcache: Add missing #include <linux/prefetch.h>
...
- make warning smp-safe
- result of atomic _unless_zero functions should be checked by caller
to avoid use-after-free error
- trivial whitespace fix.
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/12/391
Tested: compile x86, boot machine and run xfstests
Signed-off-by: Anatol Pomozov <anatol.pomozov@gmail.com>
[ Removed line-break, changed to use WARN_ON_ONCE() - Linus ]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Merge rwsem optimizations from Michel Lespinasse:
"These patches extend Alex Shi's work (which added write lock stealing
on the rwsem slow path) in order to provide rwsem write lock stealing
on the fast path (that is, without taking the rwsem's wait_lock).
I have unfortunately been unable to push this through -next before due
to Ingo Molnar / David Howells / Peter Zijlstra being busy with other
things. However, this has gotten some attention from Rik van Riel and
Davidlohr Bueso who both commented that they felt this was ready for
v3.10, and Ingo Molnar has said that he was OK with me pushing
directly to you. So, here goes :)
Davidlohr got the following test results from pgbench running on a
quad-core laptop:
| db_size | clients | tps-vanilla | tps-rwsem |
+---------+----------+----------------+--------------+
| 160 MB | 1 | 5803 | 6906 | + 19.0%
| 160 MB | 2 | 13092 | 15931 |
| 160 MB | 4 | 29412 | 33021 |
| 160 MB | 8 | 32448 | 34626 |
| 160 MB | 16 | 32758 | 33098 |
| 160 MB | 20 | 26940 | 31343 | + 16.3%
| 160 MB | 30 | 25147 | 28961 |
| 160 MB | 40 | 25484 | 26902 |
| 160 MB | 50 | 24528 | 25760 |
------------------------------------------------------
| 1.6 GB | 1 | 5733 | 7729 | + 34.8%
| 1.6 GB | 2 | 9411 | 19009 | + 101.9%
| 1.6 GB | 4 | 31818 | 33185 |
| 1.6 GB | 8 | 33700 | 34550 |
| 1.6 GB | 16 | 32751 | 33079 |
| 1.6 GB | 20 | 30919 | 31494 |
| 1.6 GB | 30 | 28540 | 28535 |
| 1.6 GB | 40 | 26380 | 27054 |
| 1.6 GB | 50 | 25241 | 25591 |
------------------------------------------------------
| 7.6 GB | 1 | 5779 | 6224 |
| 7.6 GB | 2 | 10897 | 13611 | + 24.9%
| 7.6 GB | 4 | 32683 | 33108 |
| 7.6 GB | 8 | 33968 | 34712 |
| 7.6 GB | 16 | 32287 | 32895 |
| 7.6 GB | 20 | 27770 | 31689 | + 14.1%
| 7.6 GB | 30 | 26739 | 29003 |
| 7.6 GB | 40 | 24901 | 26683 |
| 7.6 GB | 50 | 17115 | 25925 | + 51.5%
------------------------------------------------------
(Davidlohr also has one additional patch which further improves
throughput, though I will ask him to send it directly to you as I have
suggested some minor changes)."
* emailed patches from Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>:
rwsem: no need for explicit signed longs
x86 rwsem: avoid taking slow path when stealing write lock
rwsem: do not block readers at head of queue if other readers are active
rwsem: implement support for write lock stealing on the fastpath
rwsem: simplify __rwsem_do_wake
rwsem: skip initial trylock in rwsem_down_write_failed
rwsem: avoid taking wait_lock in rwsem_down_write_failed
rwsem: use cmpxchg for trying to steal write lock
rwsem: more agressive lock stealing in rwsem_down_write_failed
rwsem: simplify rwsem_down_write_failed
rwsem: simplify rwsem_down_read_failed
rwsem: move rwsem_down_failed_common code into rwsem_down_{read,write}_failed
rwsem: shorter spinlocked section in rwsem_down_failed_common()
rwsem: make the waiter type an enumeration rather than a bitmask
This change fixes a race condition where a reader might determine it
needs to block, but by the time it acquires the wait_lock the rwsem has
active readers and no queued waiters.
In this situation the reader can run in parallel with the existing
active readers; it does not need to block until the active readers
complete.
Thanks to Peter Hurley for noticing this possible race.
Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
When we decide to wake up readers, we must first grant them as many read
locks as necessary, and then actually wake up all these readers. But in
order to know how many read shares to grant, we must first count the
readers at the head of the queue. This might take a while if there are
many readers, and we want to be protected against a writer stealing the
lock while we're counting. To that end, we grant the first reader lock
before counting how many more readers are queued.
We also require some adjustments to the wake_type semantics.
RWSEM_WAKE_NO_ACTIVE used to mean that we had found the count to be
RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS, in which case the rwsem was known to be free as
nobody could steal it while we hold the wait_lock. This doesn't make
sense once we implement fastpath write lock stealing, so we now use
RWSEM_WAKE_ANY in that case.
Similarly, when rwsem_down_write_failed found that a read lock was
active, it would use RWSEM_WAKE_READ_OWNED which signalled that new
readers could be woken without checking first that the rwsem was
available. We can't do that anymore since the existing readers might
release their read locks, and a writer could steal the lock before we
wake up additional readers. So, we have to use a new RWSEM_WAKE_READERS
value to indicate we only want to wake readers, but we don't currently
hold any read lock.
Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This is mostly for cleanup value:
- We don't need several gotos to handle the case where the first
waiter is a writer. Two simple tests will do (and generate very
similar code).
- In the remainder of the function, we know the first waiter is a reader,
so we don't have to double check that. We can use do..while loops
to iterate over the readers to wake (generates slightly better code).
Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
In rwsem_down_write_failed(), if there are active locks after we wake up
(i.e. the lock got stolen from us), skip taking the wait_lock and go
back to sleep immediately.
Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Using rwsem_atomic_update to try stealing the write lock forced us to
undo the adjustment in the failure path. We can have simpler and faster
code by using cmpxchg instead.
Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Some small code simplifications can be achieved by doing more agressive
lock stealing:
- When rwsem_down_write_failed() notices that there are no active locks
(and thus no thread to wake us if we decided to sleep), it used to wake
the first queued process. However, stealing the lock is also sufficient
to deal with this case, so we don't need this check anymore.
- In try_get_writer_sem(), we can steal the lock even when the first waiter
is a reader. This is correct because the code path that wakes readers is
protected by the wait_lock. As to the performance effects of this change,
they are expected to be minimal: readers are still granted the lock
(rather than having to acquire it themselves) when they reach the front
of the wait queue, so we have essentially the same behavior as in
rwsem-spinlock.
Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
When waking writers, we never grant them the lock - instead, they have
to acquire it themselves when they run, and remove themselves from the
wait_list when they succeed.
As a result, we can do a few simplifications in rwsem_down_write_failed():
- We don't need to check for !waiter.task since __rwsem_do_wake() doesn't
remove writers from the wait_list
- There is no point releaseing the wait_lock before entering the wait loop,
as we will need to reacquire it immediately. We can change the loop so
that the lock is always held at the start of each loop iteration.
- We don't need to get a reference on the task structure, since the task
is responsible for removing itself from the wait_list. There is no risk,
like in the rwsem_down_read_failed() case, that a task would wake up and
exit (thus destroying its task structure) while __rwsem_do_wake() is
still running - wait_lock protects against that.
Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
When trying to acquire a read lock, the RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS
adjustment doesn't cause other readers to block, so we never have to
worry about waking them back after canceling this adjustment in
rwsem_down_read_failed().
We also never want to steal the lock in rwsem_down_read_failed(), so we
don't have to grab the wait_lock either.
Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Remove the rwsem_down_failed_common function and replace it with two
identical copies of its code in rwsem_down_{read,write}_failed.
This is because we want to make different optimizations in
rwsem_down_{read,write}_failed; we are adding this pure-duplication
step as a separate commit in order to make it easier to check the
following steps.
Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This change reduces the size of the spinlocked and TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE
sections in rwsem_down_failed_common():
- We only need the sem->wait_lock to insert ourselves on the wait_list;
the waiter node can be prepared outside of the wait_lock.
- The task state only needs to be set to TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE immediately
before checking if we actually need to sleep; it doesn't need to protect
the entire function.
Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
We are not planning to add some new waiter flags, so we can convert the
waiter type into an enumeration.
Background: David Howells suggested I do this back when I tried adding
a new waiter type for unfair readers. However, I believe the cleanup
applies regardless of that use case.
Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
