Check CONFIG_FREEZER instead of CONFIG_PM because kprobe booster
depends on freeze_processes() and thaw_processes() when CONFIG_PREEMPT=y.
This fixes a linkage error which occurs when CONFIG_PREEMPT=y, CONFIG_PM=y
and CONFIG_FREEZER=n.
Reported-by: Cheng Renquan <crquan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Freezer fails to compile if with the following configuration
settings:
CONFIG_CGROUPS=y
CONFIG_CGROUP_FREEZER=y
CONFIG_MODULES=y
CONFIG_FREEZER=y
CONFIG_PM=y
CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n
Fix this by making process.o compilation depend on CONFIG_FREEZER.
Reported-by: Cheng Renquan <crquan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Fix __request_region() parameter kernel-doc notation and parameter name:
Warning(linux-2.6.28-git10//kernel/resource.c:627): No description found for parameter 'flags'
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Mike's change: 0a582440f "sched: fix sched_slice())" broke group
scheduling by forgetting to reload cfs_rq on each loop.
This patch fixes aim7 regression and specjbb2005 regression becomes
less than 1.5% on 8-core stokley.
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Tested-by: Jayson King <dev@jaysonking.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Often the cause of kernel unaligned access warnings is not
obvious from just the ip displayed in the warning. This adds
the option via proc to dump the stack in addition to the warning.
The default is off (just display the 1 line warning). To enable
the stack to be shown: echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/unaligned-dump-stack
Signed-off-by: Doug Chapman <doug.chapman@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Impact: fix SCHED_IDLE latency problems
OK, so we have 1 running task A (which is obviously curr and the tree is
equally obviously empty).
'A' nicely chugs along, doing its thing, carrying min_vruntime along as it
goes.
Then some whacko speed freak SCHED_IDLE task gets inserted due to SMP
balancing, which is very likely far right, in that case
update_curr
update_min_vruntime
cfs_rq->rb_leftmost := true (the crazy task sitting in a tree)
vruntime = se->vruntime
and voila, min_vruntime is waaay right of where it ought to be.
OK, so why did I write it like that to begin with...
Aah, yes.
Say we've just dequeued current
schedule
deactivate_task(prev)
dequeue_entity
update_min_vruntime
Then we'll set
vruntime = cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
we find !cfs_rq->curr, but do find someone in the tree. Then we _must_
do vruntime = se->vruntime, because
vruntime = min_vruntime(vruntime := cfs_rq->min_vruntime, se->vruntime)
will not advance vruntime, and cause lags the other way around (which we
fixed with that initial patch: 1af5f730fc
(sched: more accurate min_vruntime accounting).
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Tested-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Stronger SCHED_IDLE isolation:
- no SCHED_IDLE buddies
- never let SCHED_IDLE preempt on wakeup
- always preempt SCHED_IDLE on wakeup
- limit SLEEPER fairness for SCHED_IDLE.
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Increase the SCHED_IDLE weight from 2 to 3, this gives much more stable
vruntime numbers.
time advanced in 100ms:
weight=2
64765.988352
67012.881408
88501.412352
weight=3
35496.181411
34130.971298
35497.411573
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Impact: make rt-limit tunables work again
Mark Glines reported:
> I've got an issue on x86-64 where I can't configure the system to allow
> RT tasks for a non-root user.
>
> In 2.6.26.5, I was able to do the following to set things up nicely:
> echo 450000 >/sys/kernel/uids/0/cpu_rt_runtime
> echo 450000 >/sys/kernel/uids/1000/cpu_rt_runtime
>
> Seems like every value I try to echo into the /sys files returns EINVAL.
For UID grouping we initialize the root group with infinite bandwidth
which by default is actually more than the global limit, therefore the
bandwidth check always fails.
Because the root group is a phantom group (for UID grouping) we cannot
runtime adjust it, therefore we let it reflect the global bandwidth
settings.
Reported-by: Mark Glines <mark@glines.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
* 'syscalls' of git://git390.osdl.marist.edu/pub/scm/linux-2.6: (44 commits)
[CVE-2009-0029] s390 specific system call wrappers
[CVE-2009-0029] System call wrappers part 33
[CVE-2009-0029] System call wrappers part 32
[CVE-2009-0029] System call wrappers part 31
[CVE-2009-0029] System call wrappers part 30
[CVE-2009-0029] System call wrappers part 29
[CVE-2009-0029] System call wrappers part 28
[CVE-2009-0029] System call wrappers part 27
[CVE-2009-0029] System call wrappers part 26
[CVE-2009-0029] System call wrappers part 25
[CVE-2009-0029] System call wrappers part 24
[CVE-2009-0029] System call wrappers part 23
[CVE-2009-0029] System call wrappers part 22
[CVE-2009-0029] System call wrappers part 21
[CVE-2009-0029] System call wrappers part 20
[CVE-2009-0029] System call wrappers part 19
[CVE-2009-0029] System call wrappers part 18
[CVE-2009-0029] System call wrappers part 17
[CVE-2009-0029] System call wrappers part 16
[CVE-2009-0029] System call wrappers part 15
...
