Pull ext4 updates from Ted Ts'o:
"Lots of bugs fixes, including Zheng and Jan's extent status shrinker
fixes, which should improve CPU utilization and potential soft lockups
under heavy memory pressure, and Eric Whitney's bigalloc fixes"
* tag 'ext4_for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4: (26 commits)
ext4: ext4_da_convert_inline_data_to_extent drop locked page after error
ext4: fix suboptimal seek_{data,hole} extents traversial
ext4: ext4_inline_data_fiemap should respect callers argument
ext4: prevent fsreentrance deadlock for inline_data
ext4: forbid journal_async_commit in data=ordered mode
jbd2: remove unnecessary NULL check before iput()
ext4: Remove an unnecessary check for NULL before iput()
ext4: remove unneeded code in ext4_unlink
ext4: don't count external journal blocks as overhead
ext4: remove never taken branch from ext4_ext_shift_path_extents()
ext4: create nojournal_checksum mount option
ext4: update comments regarding ext4_delete_inode()
ext4: cleanup GFP flags inside resize path
ext4: introduce aging to extent status tree
ext4: cleanup flag definitions for extent status tree
ext4: limit number of scanned extents in status tree shrinker
ext4: move handling of list of shrinkable inodes into extent status code
ext4: change LRU to round-robin in extent status tree shrinker
ext4: cache extent hole in extent status tree for ext4_da_map_blocks()
ext4: fix block reservation for bigalloc filesystems
...
When we're enabling journal features, we cannot use the predicate
jbd2_journal_has_csum_v2or3() because we haven't yet set the sb
feature flag fields! Moreover, we just finished loading the shash
driver, so the test is unnecessary; calculate the seed always.
Without this patch, we fail to initialize the checksum seed the first
time we turn on journal_checksum, which means that all journal blocks
written during that first mount are corrupt. Transactions written
after the second mount will be fine, since the feature flag will be
set in the journal superblock. xfstests generic/{034,321,322} are the
regression tests.
(This is important for 3.18.)
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.coM>
Reported-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
The old hash function didn't work well for 64-bit block numbers, and
used undefined (negative) shift right behavior. Use the generic
64-bit hash function instead.
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reported-by: Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@samsung.com>
__jbd2_journal_clean_checkpoint_list() returns number of buffers it
freed but noone was using the value so just stop doing that. This
also allows for simplifying the calling convention for
journal_clean_once_cp_list().
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Yuanhan has reported that when he is running fsync(2) heavy workload
creating new files over ramdisk, significant amount of time is spent in
__jbd2_journal_clean_checkpoint_list() trying to clean old transactions
(but they cannot be cleaned up because flusher hasn't yet checkpointed
those buffers). The workload can be generated by:
fs_mark -d /fs/ram0/1 -D 2 -N 2560 -n 1000000 -L 1 -S 1 -s 4096
Reduce the amount of scanning by stopping to scan the transaction list
once we find a transaction that cannot be checkpointed. Note that this
way of cleaning is still enough to keep freeing space in the journal
after fully checkpointed transactions.
Reported-and-tested-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
If EIO happens after we have dropped j_state_lock, we won't notice
that the journal has been aborted. So it is reasonable to move this
check after we have grabbed the j_checkpoint_mutex and re-grabbed the
j_state_lock. This patch helps to prevent false positive complain
after EIO.
#DMESG:
__jbd2_log_wait_for_space: needed 8448 blocks and only had 8386 space available
__jbd2_log_wait_for_space: no way to get more journal space in ram1-8
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 15 PID: 6739 at fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c:168 __jbd2_log_wait_for_space+0x188/0x200()
Modules linked in: brd iTCO_wdt lpc_ich mfd_core igb ptp dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod
CPU: 15 PID: 6739 Comm: fsstress Tainted: G W 3.17.0-rc2-00429-g684de57 #139
Hardware name: Intel Corporation W2600CR/W2600CR, BIOS SE5C600.86B.99.99.x028.061320111235 06/13/2011
00000000000000a8 ffff88077aaab878 ffffffff815c1a8c 00000000000000a8
0000000000000000 ffff88077aaab8b8 ffffffff8106ce8c ffff88077aaab898
ffff8807c57e6000 ffff8807c57e6028 0000000000002100 ffff8807c57e62f0
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff815c1a8c>] dump_stack+0x51/0x6d
[<ffffffff8106ce8c>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0
[<ffffffff8106ceda>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
[<ffffffff812419f8>] __jbd2_log_wait_for_space+0x188/0x200
[<ffffffff8123be9a>] start_this_handle+0x4da/0x7b0
[<ffffffff810990e5>] ? local_clock+0x25/0x30
[<ffffffff810aba87>] ? lockdep_init_map+0xe7/0x180
[<ffffffff8123c5bc>] jbd2__journal_start+0xdc/0x1d0
[<ffffffff811f2414>] ? __ext4_new_inode+0x7f4/0x1330
[<ffffffff81222a38>] __ext4_journal_start_sb+0xf8/0x110
[<ffffffff811f2414>] __ext4_new_inode+0x7f4/0x1330
[<ffffffff810ac359>] ? lock_release_holdtime+0x29/0x190
[<ffffffff812025bb>] ext4_create+0x8b/0x150
[<ffffffff8117fe3b>] vfs_create+0x7b/0xb0
[<ffffffff8118097b>] do_last+0x7db/0xcf0
[<ffffffff8117e31d>] ? inode_permission+0x4d/0x50
[<ffffffff811845d2>] path_openat+0x242/0x590
[<ffffffff81191a76>] ? __alloc_fd+0x36/0x140
[<ffffffff81184a6a>] do_filp_open+0x4a/0xb0
[<ffffffff81191b61>] ? __alloc_fd+0x121/0x140
[<ffffffff81172f20>] do_sys_open+0x170/0x220
[<ffffffff8117300e>] SyS_open+0x1e/0x20
[<ffffffff811715d6>] SyS_creat+0x16/0x20
[<ffffffff815c7e12>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
---[ end trace cd71c831f82059db ]---
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Free the buffer head if the journal descriptor block fails checksum
verification.
This is the jbd2 port of the e2fsprogs patch "e2fsck: free bh on csum
verify error in do_one_pass".
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Clear all three journal checksum feature flags before turning on
whichever journal checksum options we want. Rearrange the error
checking so that newer flags get complained about first.
Reported-by: TR Reardon <thomas_reardon@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Sicne the jbd/jbd2 superblock is not released until the file system is
unmounted, allocate the buffer cache from the non-moveable area to
allow page migration and CMA allocations to more easily succeed.
Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
When we discover written out buffer in transaction checkpoint list we
don't have to recheck validity of a transaction. Either this is the
last buffer in a transaction - and then we are done - or this isn't
and then we can just take another buffer from the checkpoint list
without dropping j_list_lock.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
The __jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint() doesn't require an elevated
b_count; indeed, until the jh structure gets released by the call to
jbd2_journal_put_journal_head(), the bh's b_count is elevated by
virtue of the existence of the jh structure.
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
__wait_cp_io() is only called by jbd2_log_do_checkpoint(). Fold it in
to make it a bit easier to understand.
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
__process_buffer() is only called by jbd2_log_do_checkpoint(), and it
had a very complex locking protocol where it would be called with the
j_list_lock, and sometimes exit with the lock held (if the return code
was 0), or release the lock.
This was confusing both to humans and to smatch (which erronously
complained that the lock was taken twice).
Folding __process_buffer() to the caller allows us to simplify the
control flow, making the resulting function easier to read and reason
about, and dropping the compiled size of fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c by 150
bytes (over 4% of the text size).
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
It turns out that there are some serious problems with the on-disk
format of journal checksum v2. The foremost is that the function to
calculate descriptor tag size returns sizes that are too big. This
causes alignment issues on some architectures and is compounded by the
fact that some parts of jbd2 use the structure size (incorrectly) to
determine the presence of a 64bit journal instead of checking the
feature flags.
Therefore, introduce journal checksum v3, which enlarges the
descriptor block tag format to allow for full 32-bit checksums of
journal blocks, fix the journal tag function to return the correct
sizes, and fix the jbd2 recovery code to use feature flags to
determine 64bitness.
Add a few function helpers so we don't have to open-code quite so
many pieces.
Switching to a 16-byte block size was found to increase journal size
overhead by a maximum of 0.1%, to convert a 32-bit journal with no
checksumming to a 32-bit journal with checksum v3 enabled.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reported-by: TR Reardon <thomas_reardon@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
When recovering the journal, don't fall into an infinite loop if we
encounter a corrupt journal block. Instead, just skip the block and
return an error, which fails the mount and thus forces the user to run
a full filesystem fsck.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
The current "wait_on_bit" interface requires an 'action'
function to be provided which does the actual waiting.
There are over 20 such functions, many of them identical.
Most cases can be satisfied by one of just two functions, one
which uses io_schedule() and one which just uses schedule().
So:
Rename wait_on_bit and wait_on_bit_lock to
wait_on_bit_action and wait_on_bit_lock_action
to make it explicit that they need an action function.
Introduce new wait_on_bit{,_lock} and wait_on_bit{,_lock}_io
which are *not* given an action function but implicitly use
a standard one.
The decision to error-out if a signal is pending is now made
based on the 'mode' argument rather than being encoded in the action
function.
All instances of the old wait_on_bit and wait_on_bit_lock which
can use the new version have been changed accordingly and their
action functions have been discarded.
wait_on_bit{_lock} does not return any specific error code in the
event of a signal so the caller must check for non-zero and
interpolate their own error code as appropriate.
The wait_on_bit() call in __fscache_wait_on_invalidate() was
ambiguous as it specified TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE but used
fscache_wait_bit_interruptible as an action function.
David Howells confirms this should be uniformly
"uninterruptible"
The main remaining user of wait_on_bit{,_lock}_action is NFS
which needs to use a freezer-aware schedule() call.
A comment in fs/gfs2/glock.c notes that having multiple 'action'
functions is useful as they display differently in the 'wchan'
field of 'ps'. (and /proc/$PID/wchan).
As the new bit_wait{,_io} functions are tagged "__sched", they
will not show up at all, but something higher in the stack. So
the distinction will still be visible, only with different
function names (gds2_glock_wait versus gfs2_glock_dq_wait in the
gfs2/glock.c case).
Since first version of this patch (against 3.15) two new action
functions appeared, on in NFS and one in CIFS. CIFS also now
uses an action function that makes the same freezer aware
schedule call as NFS.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> (fscache, keys)
Acked-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> (gfs2)
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140707051603.28027.72349.stgit@notabene.brown
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
The mount manpage says of the max_batch_time option,
This optimization can be turned off entirely
by setting max_batch_time to 0.
But the code doesn't do that. So fix the code to do
that.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fix up error messages printed when the transaction pointers in a
journal head are inconsistent. This improves the error messages which
are printed when running xfstests generic/068 in data=journal mode.
See the bug report at: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60786
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
It's not needed until we start trying to modifying fields in the
journal_head which are protected by j_list_lock.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
It's not needed until we start trying to modifying fields in the
journal_head which are protected by j_list_lock.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
jh->b_transaction is adequately protected for reading by the
jbd_lock_bh_state(bh), so we don't need to take j_list_lock in
__journal_try_to_free_buffer().
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
We don't otherwise need j_list_lock during the rest of commit phase
#7, so add the transaction to the checkpoint list at the very end of
commit phase #6. This allows us to drop j_list_lock earlier, which is
a good thing since it is a super hot lock.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
The two hottest locks, and thus the biggest scalability bottlenecks,
in the jbd2 layer, are the j_list_lock and j_state_lock. This has
inspired some people to do some truly unnatural things[1].
[1] https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/fast14/fast14-paper_kang.pdf
We don't need to be holding both j_state_lock and j_list_lock while
calculating the journal statistics, so move those calculations to the
very end of jbd2_journal_commit_transaction.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
