Commit 28c2103 added new state ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD, so the device power
states array must be expanded by one also.
v2: Use ACPI_D_STATE_COUNT instead of number 5 for the array size.
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Oldřich Jedlička <oldium.pro@seznam.cz>
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
All ACPICA locks are allocated by the same function,
acpi_os_create_lock(), with the help of a local variable called
"lock". Thus, when lockdep is enabled, it uses "lock" as the
name of all those locks and regards them as instances of the same
lock, which causes it to report possible locking problems with them
when there aren't any.
To work around this problem, define acpi_os_create_lock() as a macro
and make it pass its argument to spin_lock_init(), so that lockdep
uses it as the name of the new lock. Define this macron in a
Linux-specific file, to minimize the resulting modifications of
the OS-independent ACPICA parts.
This change is based on an earlier patch from Andrea Righi and it
addresses a regression from 2.6.39 tracked as
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38152
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Reported-and-tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Tested-by: Andrea Righi <andrea@betterlinux.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
_SxW returns an Integer containing the lowest D-state supported in state
Sx. If OSPM has not indicated that it supports _PR3, then the value “3”
corresponds to D3. If it has indicated _PR3 support, the value “3”
represents D3hot and the value “4” represents D3cold.
Linux does set _OSC._PR3, so we should fix it to expect that _SxW can
return 4.
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Usually, there are multiple processors defined in ACPI table, for
example
Scope (_PR)
{
Processor (CPU0, 0x00, 0x00000410, 0x06) {}
Processor (CPU1, 0x01, 0x00000410, 0x06) {}
Processor (CPU2, 0x02, 0x00000410, 0x06) {}
Processor (CPU3, 0x03, 0x00000410, 0x06) {}
}
processor_physically_present(...) will be called to check whether those
processors are physically present.
Currently we have below codes in processor_physically_present,
cpuid = acpi_get_cpuid(...);
if ((cpuid == -1) && (num_possible_cpus() > 1))
return false;
return true;
In UP kernel, acpi_get_cpuid(...) always return -1 and
num_possible_cpus() always return 1, so
processor_physically_present(...) always returns true for all passed in
processor handles.
This is wrong for UP processor or SMP processor running UP kernel.
This patch removes the !SMP version of acpi_get_cpuid(), so both UP and
SMP kernel use the same acpi_get_cpuid function.
And for UP kernel, only processor 0 is valid.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16548https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16357
Tested-by: Anton Kochkov <anton.kochkov@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Ambroz Bizjak <ambrop7@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Moved this internal space id in preparation for ACPI 5.0 changes
that will include some new space IDs.
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
APEI ERST firmware interface and implementation has no multiple users
in mind. For example, if there is four records in storage with ID: 1,
2, 3 and 4, if two ERST readers enumerate the records via
GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID as follow,
reader 1 reader 2
1
2
3
4
-1
-1
where -1 signals there is no more record ID.
Reader 1 has no chance to check record 2 and 4, while reader 2 has no
chance to check record 1 and 3. And any other GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID will
return -1, that is, other readers will has no chance to check any
record even they are not cleared by anyone.
This makes raw GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID not suitable for used by multiple
users.
To solve the issue, an in-memory ERST record ID cache is designed and
implemented. When enumerating record ID, the ID returned by
GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID is added into cache in addition to be returned to
caller. So other readers can check the cache to get all record ID
available.
Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
After redefining CONFIG_PM to depend on (CONFIG_PM_SLEEP ||
CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME) the CONFIG_PM_OPS option is redundant and can be
replaced with CONFIG_PM.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
The revision number in the FADT has been found to be completely
unreliable and cannot be trusted. Only the table length can be
used to infer the actual version.
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
The wakeup.run_wake_count ACPI device field is only used by the PCI
runtime PM code to "protect" devices from being prepared for
generating wakeup signals more than once in a row. However, it
really doesn't provide any protection, because (1) all of the
functions it is supposed to protect use their own reference counters
effectively ensuring that the device will be set up for generating
wakeup signals just once and (2) the PCI runtime PM code uses
wakeup.run_wake_count in a racy way, since nothing prevents
acpi_dev_run_wake() from being called concurrently from two different
threads for the same device.
Remove the wakeup.run_wake_count ACPI device field which is
unnecessary, confusing and used in a wrong way.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
* 'acpica' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6:
ACPICA: Update version to 20110112
ACPICA: Update all ACPICA copyrights and signons to 2011
ACPICA: Fix issues/fault with automatic "serialized" method support
ACPICA: Debugger: Lock namespace for duration of a namespace dump
ACPICA: Fix namespace race condition
ACPICA: Fix memory leak in acpi_ev_asynch_execute_gpe_method().
