With the new powerpc architecture we don't seem to be able to disable huge
pages anymore.
mm/built-in.o(.toc1+0xae0): undefined reference to `HPAGE_SHIFT'
make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
We seem to need to define HPAGE_SHIFT to something when HUGETLB_PAGE isn't
defined. This patch defines it to PAGE_SHIFT when we have no support.
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This patch merges align.c, the result isn't quite what was in ppc64 nor
what was in ppc32 :) It should implement all the functionalities of both
though. Kumar, since you played with that in the past, I suppose you
have some test cases for verifying that it works properly before I dig
out the 601 machine ? :)
Since it's likely that I won't be able to test all scenario, code
inspection is much welcome.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
My earlier merge of delay.h introduced a timebase-based udelay for
32-bit machines but also broke the 601, which doesn't have the
timebase register. This fixes it by using the 601's RTC register on
the 601, and also moves __delay() and udelay() to be out-of-line in
arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c. These functions aren't really performance
critical, after all.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
The fix to topology.h (5cfccd7f13) seems to have
a typeo, struct sched_domain has an idle_idx member but not an idle_id
member. I assume this is the fix.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Due to incomplete memory constraints, gcc would miscompile code with
sigaddset on i386 if sig arg was const.
A quote form Jakub to make the issue clear:
"You need either
__asm__("btsl %1,%0" : "+m"(*set) : "Ir"(_sig-1) : "cc");
or
__asm__("btsl %1,%0" : "=m"(*set) : "Ir"(_sig-1), "m"(*set) : "cc");
because the btsl instruction doesn't just set the memory to some
value, but needs to read its previous content as well. If you don't
tell that fact to GCC, GCC is of course free to optimize as if the asm
was just setting the value and not depended on the previous value."
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
There is no definition for seadint_init() and the unprotected prototype
breaks compilation of assembler files.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
If the kernel supports both G5 and pSeries, and CONFIG_EEH is enabled,
eeh_init() is (quite reasonably) never called when we boot on a G5. Yet
eeh_check_failure() still gets called. We should avoid doing that if
!eeh_subsystem_enabled.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
