There are some patches created by git format-patch that when scanned by
checkpatch report errors on lines like
To: address.tld
This is a checkpatch false positive.
Improve the logic a bit to ignore folded email headers to avoid emitting
these messages.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Using an else following a break or return can unnecessarily indent code
blocks.
ie:
for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
int foo = bar();
if (foo < 1)
break;
else
usleep(1);
}
is generally better written as:
for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
int foo = bar();
if (foo < 1)
break;
usleep(1);
}
Warn when a bare else statement is preceded by a break or return
indented 1 tab more than the else.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Logging messages that show some type of "out of memory" error are
generally unnecessary as there is a generic message and a stack dump
done by the memory subsystem.
These messages generally increase kernel size without much added value.
Emit a warning on these types of messages.
This test looks for any inserted message function, then looks at the
previous line for an "if (!foo)" or "if (foo == NULL)" test and then
looks at the preceding statement for an allocation function like "foo =
kmalloc()"
ie: this code matches:
foo = kmalloc();
if (foo == NULL) {
printk("Out of memory\n");
return -ENOMEM;
}
This test is very crude and incomplete.
This test can miss quite a lot of of OOM messages that do not have this
specific form.
ie: this code does not match:
foo = kmalloc();
if (!foo) {
rtn = -ENOMEM;
printk("Out of memory!\n");
goto out;
}
This test could also be a false positive when the logging message itself
does not specify anything about memory, but I did not find any false
positives in my limited testing.
spatch could be a better solution but correctness seems non-trivial for
that tool too.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Acked-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Using a #define ending in a semicolon is poor style and can lead to
unexpected code paths being executed.
Warn on uses of these #define types:
#define foo[(...)] bar;
#define foo[(...)] \
bar;
Based on a patch from Borislav Petkov.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Networking files are generally more strictly conformant to linux-kernel
style so make checkpatch more verbose by default for patches to files or
when checking files in these directories.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
We attempt to search for compatible strings which use a variable token in
the documented name such as <chip> or <soc>. While this was attempted to
be handled, it's utterly broken.
The desired forms of matching are:
vendor,<chip>-*
vendor,name<part#>-*
For <chip>, lower case characters and numbers are permitted. For <part#>,
only numeric values are allowed.
With this change, the number of missing compatible strings reported in
arch/arm/boot/dts is reduced from 1071 to 960.
Reported-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@epfl.ch>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This test prevents code from being aligned around the : for easy visual
counting of bitfield lengths.
ie:
int foo : 1,
int bar : 2,
int foobar :29;
should be acceptable so remove the test.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Suggested-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Currently the parenthesis alignment test works only on misalignments of
if statements like
if (foo(bar,
baz)
Expand the test to find misalignments like:
static inline int foo(int bar,
int baz)
and
foo(bar,
baz);
and
foo = bar(baz,
qux);
Expand the $Inline keyword for __inline and __inline__ too.
Add $Inline to $Declare so it also matches "static inline <foo>".
These checks are only performed with --strict.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
A commit hook for the Gerrit code review server [1] inserts change
identifiers so Gerrit can track patches through multiple revisions.
These identifiers are noise in the context of the upstream kernel.
(Many Gerrit servers are private. Even given a public instance, given
only a Change-Id, one must guess which server a change was tracked on.
Patches submitted to the Linux kernel mailing lists should be able to
stand on their own. If it's truly useful to reference code review on a
Gerrit server, a URL is a much clearer way to do so.) Thus, issue an
error when a Change-Id line is encountered before the Signed-off-by.
1. https://gerrit.googlesource.com/gerrit/+/master/gerrit-server/src/main/resources/com/google/gerrit/server/tools/root/hooks/commit-msg
Signed-off-by: Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Revert commit 7e4915e789 ("checkpatch: add warning of future
__GFP_NOFAIL use").
There are no plans to remove __GFP_NOFAIL.
__GFP_NOFAIL exists to
a) centralise the retry-allocation-for-ever operation into the core
allocator, which is the appropriate implementation site and
b) permit us to identify code sites which aren't handling memory
exhaustion appropriately.
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Networking prefers this style, so warn when it's not used.
Networking uses:
void foo(int bar)
{
int baz;
code...
}
not
void foo(int bar)
{
int baz;
code...
}
There are a limited number of false positives when using macros to
declare variables like:
WARNING: networking uses a blank line after declarations
#330: FILE: net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c:330:
+ int dif = sk->sk_bound_dev_if;
+ INET_ADDR_COOKIE(acookie, saddr, daddr)
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
With a compatible string like
compatible = "foo";
checkpatch will currently try to find "foo" in vendor-prefixes.txt,
which is wrong since the vendor prefix is empty in this specific case.
Skip the vendor test if the compatible is not like
compatible = "vendor,something";
Signed-off-by: Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@epfl.ch>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
