When the last hunk of a patch is short it will trigger errors from
checkpatch:
Use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//)
at /usr/local/bin/checkpatch.pl line 394.
Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string
at /usr/local/bin/checkpatch.pl line 397.
Use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//)
Avoid touching beyond the last line. Reported by Julien Brunel.
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Cc: Julien Brunel <brunel@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Report the correct lines for single statement blocks. Currently we are
reporting the right number of lines, but not skipping the negative lines.
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
We should skip over and check the lines which follow preprocessor
statements, labels, and blank lines. These all have legitimate reasons to
be indented differently.
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
We are currently only reporting syspect indents if the conditional is
modified but the indent missmatch could be generated by the body changing,
make sure we catch both. Also only report the first line of the body, and
more importantly make sure we report the raw copy of the line. Finally
report the indent levels to make it easier to understand what is wrong.
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Absolute references to kernel source files are generally only useful
locally to the originator of the patch. Check for any such references and
report them.
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
It is much more likely that an architecture file will want to directly
include asm header files. Reduce this WARNING to a CHECK when the
referencing file is in the arch directory.
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
It is possible to have other include/asm paths within the tree which are
not subject to the do not edit checks. Ignore those.
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
We are not counting the lines in the block correctly which causes the
comment scan to stop prematurly and thus miss comments which end at the
end of the block. Fix this up.
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
It is a common and sane idiom to allow a single return on the end of a
case statement:
switch (...) {
case foo: return bar;
}
Add an exception for this.
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Labels have different indent rules and must be ignored when checking the
conditional indent levels. Also correct identify labels in single
statement conditionals.
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
It is possible to use double ampersand (&&) in unary context where it
means the address of a goto label. Handle spacing for it.
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
It is wholy reasonable to have square brackets representing array slices
in braces on the same line. These should be spaced.
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
When checking spacing for pointer checks the type cannot start in the
middle of a word, ie. this is not 'int * bar':
x = fooint * bar;
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Now that we have a variants system, move to using that to carry the
unary/binary designation for +, -, &, and *.
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Add checks for the question mark colon operator spacing, and also check
the other uses of colon. Colon means a number of things:
- it introduces the else part of the ?: operator,
- it terminates a goto label,
- it terminates the case value,
- it separates the identifier from the bit size on bit fields, and
- it is used to introduce option types in asm().
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
