Check to make sure the blank lines aren't comment lines like:
bool foo(bool bar)
{
/* Don't warn on a leading comment */
return !bar;
/* Don't warn on a trailing comment either */
}
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Figure out first how to determine if this is in a struct declaration or in
a function body before enabling this.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Allow "#define foo struct.member" without bleating a warning.
This also allows "#define foo bar.baz->qux" and so on.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Comparing get_jiffies_64() is almost always wrong and time_before64 and
time_after64 should be used instead.
Warn on any comparison to get_jiffies_64().
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Comparing jiffies is almost always wrong and time_before and time_after
should be used instead.
Warn on any comparison to jiffies.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Some block comments in network are written as:
/* block comment line 1
block comment line 2
*/
Emit a warning on the "block comment line 2" because it should be
/* block comment line 1
* block comment line 2
*/
This warning is only emitted on the second line of a block comment.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Show the first line of the comment after a line with just /* to better
show where the defective comment style is in the file.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Commit be987d9f80 ("checkpatch: improve CamelCase test for Page") added
it but it shouldn't be there. Must have been my fault.
Make sure that the tested variable doesn't contain a constant.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Add another test for memory allocation style to follow
Documentation/CodingStyle:
Chapter 14: Allocating memory
The preferred form for passing a size of a struct is the following:
p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), ...);
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The gcc extension for binary constants that start with 0b is only
supported with gcc version 4.3 or higher.
The kernel can still be compiled with earlier versions of gcc, so have
checkpatch emit a warning for these constants.
Restructure checkpatch's constant finding code a bit to support finding
these binary constants.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Suggested-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Do not bleat a message on nominally acceptable CamelCase uses that are
separated by an _ like drm_core_has_MTRR.
CamelCase tests are also a bit noisy against certain types of code
acceptable to some kernel developers.
Make the test applicable only with --strict.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
As people started using Suggested-by as standard signature, adding
"Suggested-by" to the standard signature so that checkpatch won't
generate warning when Suggested-by is used in patch signature
Signed-off-by: Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@ti.com>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This check was intended to catch extra newlines at the end of a function
definition, but it would trigger on any closing brace, including those
of inline functions and macro definitions, triggering false positives.
Now, only closing braces on a line by themselves trigger this check.
Tested with:
$ cat test.h
/* test.h - Test file */
static inline int foo(void) { return 0; }
static inline int bar(void)
{
return 1;
}
$ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict -f test.h # Before this commit
CHECK: Blank lines aren't necessary before a close brace '}'
+
+static inline int foo(void) { return 0; }
CHECK: Blank lines aren't necessary before a close brace '}'
+
+}
total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 2 checks, 9 lines checked
$ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict -f test.h # After this commit
CHECK: Blank lines aren't necessary before a close brace '}'
+
+}
total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 1 checks, 9 lines checked
Signed-off-by: Matthijs Kooijman <matthijs@stdin.nl>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Complain about files with an executable bit set that are not in a scripts/
directory and are not type .pl, .py, .awk, or .sh
Based on an initial patch from Stephen.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Fix checkpatch misreporting defect with stringification macros
ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parenthesis
#27: FILE: arch/arm/include/asm/kgdb.h:41:
+#define ___to_string(X) #X
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Reported-by: Vincent Stehlé <v-stehle@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Do not test udelay() for a value less than 10usec when passed a variable
instead of a hard-coded number; there is no way for checkpatch to know the
value of the variable. As it is today, it will complain about variables
with alphanumeric characters plus '_', e.g. foo_bar, but not variables
with other characters, eg. foo->bar.
Signed-off-by: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
kcalloc is sometimes misused with the first and second arguments switched.
Same issue with kmalloc_array too.
Bleat if sizeof is the first argument
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
I'm getting a ton of these:
WARNING: Avoid CamelCase: <PageTransHuge>
#140: FILE: mm/migrate.c:1576:
+ if (PageTransHuge(page) && page_count(page) != 3) {
So exclude anything which starts with "Page".
Tested-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Commit 74349bcced ("checkpatch: add support for floating point
constants") added an unnecessary match variable that caused tests that
used a $Constant or $LvalOrFunc to have one too many matches.
This causes problems with usleep_range, min/max and other extended
tests.
Avoid using match variables in $Float.
Avoid using match variables in $Assignment too.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
