Using a #define ending in a semicolon is poor style and can lead to
unexpected code paths being executed.
Warn on uses of these #define types:
#define foo[(...)] bar;
#define foo[(...)] \
bar;
Based on a patch from Borislav Petkov.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Networking files are generally more strictly conformant to linux-kernel
style so make checkpatch more verbose by default for patches to files or
when checking files in these directories.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
We attempt to search for compatible strings which use a variable token in
the documented name such as <chip> or <soc>. While this was attempted to
be handled, it's utterly broken.
The desired forms of matching are:
vendor,<chip>-*
vendor,name<part#>-*
For <chip>, lower case characters and numbers are permitted. For <part#>,
only numeric values are allowed.
With this change, the number of missing compatible strings reported in
arch/arm/boot/dts is reduced from 1071 to 960.
Reported-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@epfl.ch>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This test prevents code from being aligned around the : for easy visual
counting of bitfield lengths.
ie:
int foo : 1,
int bar : 2,
int foobar :29;
should be acceptable so remove the test.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Suggested-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Currently the parenthesis alignment test works only on misalignments of
if statements like
if (foo(bar,
baz)
Expand the test to find misalignments like:
static inline int foo(int bar,
int baz)
and
foo(bar,
baz);
and
foo = bar(baz,
qux);
Expand the $Inline keyword for __inline and __inline__ too.
Add $Inline to $Declare so it also matches "static inline <foo>".
These checks are only performed with --strict.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
A commit hook for the Gerrit code review server [1] inserts change
identifiers so Gerrit can track patches through multiple revisions.
These identifiers are noise in the context of the upstream kernel.
(Many Gerrit servers are private. Even given a public instance, given
only a Change-Id, one must guess which server a change was tracked on.
Patches submitted to the Linux kernel mailing lists should be able to
stand on their own. If it's truly useful to reference code review on a
Gerrit server, a URL is a much clearer way to do so.) Thus, issue an
error when a Change-Id line is encountered before the Signed-off-by.
1. https://gerrit.googlesource.com/gerrit/+/master/gerrit-server/src/main/resources/com/google/gerrit/server/tools/root/hooks/commit-msg
Signed-off-by: Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Revert commit 7e4915e789 ("checkpatch: add warning of future
__GFP_NOFAIL use").
There are no plans to remove __GFP_NOFAIL.
__GFP_NOFAIL exists to
a) centralise the retry-allocation-for-ever operation into the core
allocator, which is the appropriate implementation site and
b) permit us to identify code sites which aren't handling memory
exhaustion appropriately.
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Networking prefers this style, so warn when it's not used.
Networking uses:
void foo(int bar)
{
int baz;
code...
}
not
void foo(int bar)
{
int baz;
code...
}
There are a limited number of false positives when using macros to
declare variables like:
WARNING: networking uses a blank line after declarations
#330: FILE: net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c:330:
+ int dif = sk->sk_bound_dev_if;
+ INET_ADDR_COOKIE(acookie, saddr, daddr)
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
With a compatible string like
compatible = "foo";
checkpatch will currently try to find "foo" in vendor-prefixes.txt,
which is wrong since the vendor prefix is empty in this specific case.
Skip the vendor test if the compatible is not like
compatible = "vendor,something";
Signed-off-by: Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@epfl.ch>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The current octal permissions test is very slow.
When patch ("checkpatch: add checks for constant non-octal permissions")
was added, processing time approximately tripled.
Regain almost all of the performance by not looping through all the
possible functions unless the line contains one of the functions.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Modify warning message when printk is used in a patch. It mentions to
use subsystem_dbg instead of netdev_dbg as the first preferred format of
logging debug messages.
Signed-off-by: Yogesh Chaudhari <mr.yogesh@gmail.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This test is a bit noisy and opinions seem to agree that it should not
warn in a lot more situations.
It seems people agree that:
return (foo || bar);
and
return foo || bar;
are both acceptable style and checkpatch should be silent about them.
For now, it warns on parentheses around a simple constant or a single
function or a ternary.
return (foo);
return (foo(bar));
return (foo ? bar : baz);
The last ternary test may be quieted in the future.
Modify the deparenthesize function to only strip balanced leading and
trailing parentheses.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: Monam Agarwal <monamagarwal123@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
It's very common to have normal block comments for the initial comments
of a file description preface.
So for files in drivers/net and net/ don't emit a warning when the first
comment block in the file uses the normal block comment style and not
the networking block comment style.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
static const char* arrays create smaller text as each function call does
not have to populate the array.
Emit a warning when char *arrays aren't static const and the array is
not apparently global by being declared in the first column.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
checkpatch could not distinguish between a variable in a struct named
jiffies and the normal jiffies.
foo->jiffies
would emit a "Comparing jiffies" arning.
Update the $Compare variable to do a negative look-behind for "-" when
finding a ">" so that a pointer dereference like -> isn't a comparison.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Emit a warning when using any of these __constant_<foo> forms:
__constant_cpu_to_be[x]
__constant_cpu_to_le[x]
__constant_be[x]_to_cpu
__constant_le[x]_to_cpu
__constant_htons
__constant_ntohs
Using any of these outside of include/uapi/ isn't preferred as using the
function without __constant_ is identical when the argument is a
constant.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Cc: Simon Wunderlich <sw@simonwunderlich.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
umode_t permissions are sometimes mistakenly written with decimal
constants. Verify that numeric permissions are using octal.
Add a list of the most commonly used functions and macros that have
umode_t permissions and the argument position.
Add a $Octal type to $Constant.
Allow $LvalOrFunc to be a pointer indirection too.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Checks for some function pointer return styles are too strict. Fix
them.
Multiple spaces after function pointer return types are allowed.
int (*foo)(int bar)
Spaces after function pointer returns of pointer types are not required.
int *(*foo)(int bar)
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
