Requires --strict option during invocation:
~/linux$ scripts/checkpatch --strict foo.patch
This tests for a bad habits of mine like this:
return 0 ;
Note that it does allow a special case of a bare semicolon
for empty loops:
while (foo())
;
Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Revert the --strict test for the old preferred block
comment style in drivers/net and net/
Reported-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
checkpatch already makes an exception to the 80-column rule for quoted
strings, and Documentation/CodingStyle recommends not splitting quoted
strings across lines, because it breaks the ability to grep for the
string. Rather than just permitting this, actively warn about quoted
strings split across lines.
Test case:
void context(void)
{
struct { unsigned magic; const char *strdata; } foo[] = {
{ 42, "these strings"
"do not produce warnings" },
{ 256, "though perhaps"
"they should" },
};
pr_err("this string"
" should produce a warning\n");
pr_err("this multi-line string\n"
"should not produce a warning\n");
asm ("this asm\n\t"
"should not produce a warning");
}
Results of checkpatch on that test case:
WARNING: quoted string split across lines
+ " should produce a warning\n");
total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 15 lines checked
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Acked-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Add some more subjective --strict tests.
Add a test for block comments that start with a blank line followed only
by a line with just the comment block initiator. Prefer a blank line
followed by /* comment...
Add a test for unnecessary spaces after a cast.
Add a test for symmetric uses of braces in if/else blocks.
If one branch needs braces, then all branches should use braces.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
With any very high precedence operator it is not necessary to enforce
additional parentheses around simple negated expressions. This prevents
us requesting further perentheses around the following:
#define PMEM_IS_FREE(id, index) !(pmem[id].bitmap[index].allocated)
For now add logical and bitwise not and unary minus.
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Adjacent strings indicate concatentation, therefore look at identifiers
directly adjacent to literal strings as strings too. This allows us to
better detect the form below and accept it as a simple constant:
#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Fix checkpatch.pl when both -q and --ignore are given and prevents it from
printing a
NOTE: Ignored message types: blah
messages.
E.g., if I use -q --ignore PREFER_PACKED,PREFER_ALIGNED, i see:
NOTE: Ignored message types: PREFER_ALIGNED PREFER_PACKED
It makes no sense to print this when -q is given.
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Argument alignment across multiple lines should match the open
parenthesis.
Logical continuations should be at the end of the previous line, not the
start of a new line.
These are not required by CodingStyle so make the tests active only when
using --strict.
Improved by some examples from Bruce Allen.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: "Bruce W. Allen" <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Overly indented code should be refactored.
Suggest refactoring excessive indentation of of
if/else/for/do/while/switch statements.
For example:
$ cat t.c
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
if (1)
if (2)
if (3)
if (4)
if (5)
if (6)
if (7)
if (8)
;
return 0;
}
$ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl -f t.c
WARNING: Too many leading tabs - consider code refactoring
#12: FILE: t.c:12:
+ if (6)
WARNING: Too many leading tabs - consider code refactoring
#13: FILE: t.c:13:
+ if (7)
WARNING: Too many leading tabs - consider code refactoring
#14: FILE: t.c:14:
+ if (8)
total: 0 errors, 3 warnings, 17 lines checked
t.c has style problems, please review.
If any of these errors are false positives, please report
them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Fix up type and cast spacing checks such that all occurences on a line are
examined and reported. For example the line below has a valid cast and a
bad type, but currently we check the cast first which is good and stop:
u16* bar = (u16 *)baz;
We will also only report one of the errors in this example:
u16* bar = (u16*)bad;
Move to iterating across all casts and all types, reporting any failure.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
typeof may have various more complex forms as its arguement, not just an
identifier. For now allow us to leak to the first close perenthesis ')'.
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
We are incorrectly matching square brackets '[' and ']' leading to false
positives on more complex functions as below:
return (dt3155_fbuffer[m]->ready_head -
dt3155_fbuffer[m]->ready_len +
dt3155_fbuffer[m]->nbuffers)%
(dt3155_fbuffer[m]->nbuffers);
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
It is common to stub out a function as below, this is triggering a complex
macro format incorrectly. Sort this out:
#define cma_early_regions_reserve(reserve) do { } while (0)
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The following fragment defeats the DEVICE_ATTR style handing, check for
and ignore the close brace '}' in this context:
int foo()
{
}
DEVICE_ATTR(link_power_management_policy, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
ata_scsi_lpm_show, ata_scsi_lpm_put);
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_attr_link_power_management_policy);
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The intent of this check is to catch the options which the user will see
and ensure they are properly described. It is also common for internal
only options to have a brief description. Allow this form.
Reported-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Tested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
In the middle of a long definition or similar, there is no possibility of
finding a smaller sub-statement. Optimise this case by skipping statement
aquirey where there are no starts of statement (open brace '{' or
semi-colon ';'). We are likely to scan slightly more than needed still
but this is safest.
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
