For some m68k configs, I get:
| net/rfkill/rfkill-input.c: In function 'rfkill_start':
| net/rfkill/rfkill-input.c:208: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
As the incomplete type is `struct task_struct', including <linux/sched.h> fixes
it.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The LED state was not being updated by rfkill_force_state(), which
will cause regressions in wireless drivers that had old-style rfkill
support and are updated to use rfkill_force_state().
The LED state was not being updated when a change was detected through
the rfkill->get_state() hook, either.
Move the LED trigger update calls into notify_rfkill_state_change(),
where it should have been in the first place. This takes care of both
issues above.
Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Currently, rfkill would stand in the way of properly supporting wireless
devices that are capable of waking the system up from sleep or hibernation
when they receive a special wireless message. It would also get in the way
of mesh devices that need to remain operational even during platform
suspend.
To avoid that, stop trying to block the transmitters on the rfkill class
suspend handler.
Drivers that need rfkill's older behaviour will have to implement it by
themselves in their own suspend handling.
Do note that rfkill *will* attempt to restore the transmitter state on
resume in any situation. This happens after the driver's resume method is
called by the suspend core (class devices resume after the devices they are
attached to have been resumed).
The following drivers need to check if they need to explicitly block
their transmitters in their own suspend handlers (maintainers Cc'd):
arch/arm/mach-pxa/tosa-bt.c
drivers/net/usb/hso.c
drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/* (USB might need it?)
drivers/net/wireless/b43/ (SSB over USB might need it?)
drivers/misc/hp-wmi.c
eeepc-laptop w/rfkill support (not in mainline yet)
Compal laptop w/rfkill support (not in mainline yet)
toshiba-acpi w/rfkill support (not in mainline yet)
Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Cc: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Bird <ajb@spheresystems.co.uk>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: Cezary Jackiewicz <cezary.jackiewicz@gmail.com>
Cc: Philip Langdale <philipl@overt.org>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
rfkill_mutex and rfkill->mutex are too easy to confuse with each other.
Rename rfkill_mutex to rfkill_global_mutex, so that they are easier to tell
apart with just one glance.
Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
BUG_ON() and WARN() the heck out of buggy drivers calling into the rfkill
subsystem.
Also switch from WARN_ON(1) to the new descriptive WARN().
Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Switch sysfs parsing to something that actually works properly.
Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
While it is interesting to not add last-enum-markers because it allows gcc
to warn us of switch() statements missing a valid state, we really should
be handling memory corruption on a rfkill state with default clauses,
anyway.
So add RFKILL_STATE_MAX and use it where applicable. It makes for safer
code in the long run.
Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
rfkill is not a small, mere detail in wireless support. Once it starts
supporting rfkill and users start counting on that support, a wireless
device is at risk of operating in dangerous conditions should rfkill
support fail to properly activate.
Therefore, add the required __must_check annotations on some key functions
of the rfkill API, for which the wireless drivers absolutely MUST handle
the failure mode safely in order to avoid a potentially dangerous situation
where the wireless transmitter is left enabled when the user don't want it
to.
Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Add a second set of global states, "rfkill_default_states", to track the
state that will be used when the first rfkill class of a given type is
registered, and also to save "undo" information when rfkill_epo is called.
Add a new exported function, rfkill_set_default(), which can be used by
platform drivers to restore radio state saved by the platform across
reboots or shutdown.
Also, fix rfkill_epo to properly update rfkill_states, but still preserve a
copy of the state so that we can undo the effect of rfkill_epo later if we
want to. Add rfkill_restore_states() to restore rfkill_states from the
copy.
Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Detect and abort with -EEXIST if rfkill_register is called twice on the
same rfkill struct. And WARN_ON(it) for good measure.
While at it, flag when we are adding the first switch of a type, we will
need that information later.
Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Guard rfkill controllers attached to a rfkill class against state changes
after class suspend has been issued.
Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Provide default activate function to set the state of the led
when the led becomes bound to the trigger
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Allow the rfkill driver to specify led trigger name.
By default it still defaults to the name of rfkill switch.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Every time a new input device that is capable of one of the
rfkill EV_SW events (currently only SW_RFKILL_ALL) is connected to
rfkill-input, we must check the states of the input EV_SW switches
and take action. Otherwise, we will ignore the initial switch state.
We also need to re-check the states of the EV_SW switches after
a device that was under an exclusive grab is released back to us,
since we got no input events from that device while it was grabbed.
Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
For some stupid reason, I sent and old version of the patch minor kernel
doc-fix patch, and it got merged before I noticed the problem. This is an
incremental fix on top.
Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
There are two mutexes in rfkill:
rfkill->mutex, which protects some of the fields of a rfkill struct, and is
also used for callback serialization.
rfkill_mutex, which protects the global state, the list of registered
rfkill structs and rfkill->claim.
Make sure to use the correct mutex, and to not miss locking rfkill->mutex
even when we already took rfkill_mutex.
Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
rfkill needs to unregister the led trigger AFTER a call to
rfkill_remove_switch(), otherwise it will not update the LED state,
possibly leaving it ON when it should be OFF.
To make led-trigger unregistering safer, guard against unregistering a
trigger twice, and also against issuing trigger events to a led trigger
that was unregistered. This makes the error unwind paths more resilient.
Refer to "rfkill: Register LED triggers before registering switch".
Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
While the rfkill class does work with just get_state(), it doesn't work
well on devices that are subject to external events that cause rfkill state
changes.
Document that rfkill_force_state() is required in those cases.
Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
rfkill_add_switch() calls rfkill_toggle_radio() to set the state of a
recently registered rfkill class to the current global state [for that
rfkill->type].
The rfkill_toggle_radio() call is going to error out if the hardware is
RFKILL_STATE_HARD_BLOCKED, and the global state is RFKILL_STATE_UNBLOCKED.
That is a quite normal situation which I missed to account for. As things
stand, the error return from rfkill_toggle_radio ends up causing
rfkill_register to bail out with an error (de-registering the new switch in
the process), which is Not Nice.
Change rfkill_add_switch() to not return errors because of a failed call to
rfkill_toggle_radio(). We can go back to returning errors again (if that's
indeed the right thing to do) if we define the exact error codes the
rfkill->toggle_radio callbacks are to return in each situation, so that we
can ignore the right ones only.
Bug reported by "kionez <kionez@anche.no>".
Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Cc: kionez <kionez@anche.no>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Improve rfkill_toggle_radio's kernel-doc header a bit.
Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
The current naming of rfkill_state causes a lot of confusion: not only the
"kill" in rfkill suggests negative logic, but also the fact that rfkill cannot
turn anything on (it can just force something off or stop forcing something
off) is often forgotten.
Rename RFKILL_STATE_OFF to RFKILL_STATE_SOFT_BLOCKED (transmitter is blocked
and will not operate; state can be changed by a toggle_radio request), and
RFKILL_STATE_ON to RFKILL_STATE_UNBLOCKED (transmitter is not blocked, and may
operate).
Also, add a new third state, RFKILL_STATE_HARD_BLOCKED (transmitter is blocked
and will not operate; state cannot be changed through a toggle_radio request),
which is used by drivers to indicate a wireless transmiter was blocked by a
hardware rfkill line that accepts no overrides.
Keep the old names as #defines, but document them as deprecated. This way,
drivers can be converted to the new names *and* verified to actually use rfkill
correctly one by one.
Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
SW_RFKILL_ALL is the "emergency power-off all radios" input event. It must
be handled, and must always do the same thing as far as the rfkill system
is concerned: all transmitters are to go *immediately* offline.
For safety, do NOT allow userspace to override EV_SW SW_RFKILL_ALL OFF. As
long as rfkill-input is loaded, that event will *always* be processed, and
it will *always* force all rfkill switches to disable all wireless
transmitters, regardless of user_claim attribute or anything else.
Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
The whole current_state thing seems completely useless and a source of
problems in rfkill-input, since state comparison is already done in rfkill,
and rfkill-input is more than likely to become out of sync with the real
state.
Signed-off-by: Fabien Crespel <fabien@crespel.net>
Acked-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Use the notification chains to also send uevents, so that userspace can be
notified of state changes of every rfkill switch.
Userspace should use these events for OSD/status report applications and
rfkill GUI frontends. HAL might want to broadcast them over DBUS, for
example. It might be also useful for userspace implementations of
rfkill-input, or to use HAL as the platform driver which promotes rfkill
switch change events into input events (to synchronize all other switches)
when necessary for platforms that lack a convenient platform-specific
kernel module to do it.
Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
