module_param(bool) used to counter-intuitively take an int. In
fddd5201 (mid-2009) we allowed bool or int/unsigned int using a messy
trick.
It's time to remove the int/unsigned int option. For this version
it'll simply give a warning, but it'll break next kernel version.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
commit d05c65fff0 ("genirq: spurious: Run only one poller at a time")
introduced a regression, leaving the boot options 'irqfixup' and
'irqpoll' non-functional. The patch placed tests in each function, to
exit if the function is already running. The test in 'misrouted_irq'
exited when it should have proceeded, effectively disabling
'misrouted_irq' and 'poll_spurious_irqs'.
The check for an already running poller needs to be "!= 1" not "== 1"
as "1" is the value when the first poller starts running.
Signed-off-by: Edward Donovan <edward.donovan@numble.net>
Cc: maciej.rutecki@gmail.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1320175784-6745-1-git-send-email-edward.donovan@numble.net
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # >= 2.6.39
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
The detection of spurios interrupts is currently limited to first level
handler. In force-threaded mode we never notice if the threaded irq does
not feel responsible.
This patch catches the return value of the threaded handler and forwards
it to the spurious detector. If the primary handler returns only
IRQ_WAKE_THREAD then the spourious detector ignores it because it gets
called again from the threaded handler.
[ tglx: Report the erroneous return value early and bail out ]
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1306824972-27067-2-git-send-email-sebastian@breakpoint.cc
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
We really need these flags for some of the interrupt chips. Move it
from internal state to irq_data and provide proper accessors.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
That's the right data structure to look at for arch code.
Accessor functions are provided.
irqd_is_per_cpu(irqdata);
irqd_can_balance(irqdata);
Coders who access them directly will be tracked down and slapped with
stinking trouts.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
We need to maintain the flag for now in both fields status and istate.
Add a CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO_COMPAT switch to allow testing w/o
the status one. Wrap the access to status IRQ_INPROGRESS in a inline
which can be turned of with CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO_COMPAT along
with the define.
There is no reason that anything outside of core looks at this. That
needs some modifications, but we'll get there.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
With the chip.end() function gone we might run into a situation where
a poll call runs and the real interrupt comes in, sees IRQ_INPROGRESS
and disables the line. That might be a perfect working one, which will
then be masked forever.
So mark them polled while the poll runs. When the real handler sees
IRQ_INPROGRESS it checks the poll flag and waits for the polling to
complete. Add the necessary amount of sanity checks to it to avoid
deadlocks.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
There is no point in polling disabled lines.
percpu does not make sense at all because we only poll on the cpu
we're currently running on. Also polling per_cpu interrupts is racy as
hell. The handler runs without locking so we might get a huge
surprise.
If the timer interrupt needs polling, then we wont get there anyway.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
try_one_irq() contains redundant code and lots of useless checks for
shared interrupts. Check for shared before setting IRQ_INPROGRESS and
then call handle_IRQ_event() while pending. Shorter version with the
same functionality.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
We cannot walk the action chain unlocked. Even if IRQ_INPROGRESS is
set an action can be removed and we follow a null pointer. It's safe
to take the lock there, because the code which removes the action will
call synchronize_irq() which waits unlocked for IRQ_INPROGRESS going
away.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
This option covers now the old chip functions and the irq_desc data
fields which are moving to struct irq_data. More stuff will follow.
Pretty handy for testing a conversion, whether something broke or not.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
