The file(s) below do not use LINUX_VERSION_CODE nor KERNEL_VERSION.
drivers/leds/leds-hp-disk.c
drivers/misc/panasonic-laptop.c
This patch removes the said #include <version.h>.
Signed-off-by: Huang Weiyi <weiyi.huang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
As it is, all instances of ->release() for files that have ->fasync()
need to remember to evict file from fasync lists; forgetting that
creates a hole and we actually have a bunch that *does* forget.
So let's keep our lives simple - let __fput() check FASYNC in
file->f_flags and call ->fasync() there if it's been set. And lose that
crap in ->release() instances - leaving it there is still valid, but we
don't have to bother anymore.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
For the time being build for ia64-sn2 alone when CONFIG_IA64_GENERIC is
specified.
This eliminates a dependency of the XP/XPC drivers on having the GRU
driver insmod'd in order to insmod them, when running on an ia64-sn2
system.
On such a system the GRU driver serves no useful purpose.
Signed-off-by: Dean Nelson <dcn@sgi.com>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
drivers/misc/intel_menlow.c:107: warning: format ‘%ld’ expects type ‘long int’, but argument 3 has type ‘long long unsigned int’
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
sync with acpi_driver_data(device)
and acpi_evaluate_integer(..., long long)
changes that happened since this driver
was checked in.
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
panasonic-laptop uses many acpi_*() functions so it should
depend on ACPI; otherwise there are approximately 70
warnings/errors generated.
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Based on analysis and a patch from Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>.
Instruct the ThinkPad ACPI firmware to remove delays on the processing of
backlight brightness changes. This method is present on ThinkPad
Vista-compatible BIOSes with standard ACPI backlight level control.
Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Trivial fix makes the error message match the code before it (ibm->driver
vs ibm->acpi-driver) better.
Signed-off-by: Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl>
Acked-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Attempt to preserve fan state across sleep and hibernation if the fan
control mode is enabled.
For safety reasons, only the PWM OFF (fan at 100%) or maximum
closed-loop level (level 7) are preserved. If the fan state was set
to anything else, it will not be restored.
Also, should the fan be at PWM OFF mode at resume, it will be left at
that state (but this is extremely unlikely, no ThinkPad firmware was
ever reported to do this).
For reference, the known states used for fan control upon resume by
the firmware are either "auto" or "level 7" depending on whether the
laptop wakes due to normal conditions or a thermal emergency.
Fixes: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11331
Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Cc: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
The AE_BAD_ADDRESS exception code is now unused in ACPICA.
For linux, it's only used at wmi.c and acer-wmi.c.
I checked both wmi.c and acer-wmi.c, the AE_BAD_ADDRESS exception code
has no special meaning. The parent functions just call AE_SUCCESS() or
AE_FAILURE() to check the return status.
So it's safe to replace AE_BAD_ADDRESS with AE_ERROR.
Signed-off-by Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
On my HP 2510, pressing the (i) button generates an unknown keycode:
0x213b. So here is a patch adding support for it. However, as it seems
there is already support for a similar button connected to 0x231b as
keycode, I wonder if it could be a typo in the driver?
Signed-off-by: Eric Piel <eric.piel@tremplin-utc.net>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
