Shift the first year to 1968 for Sun SPARC machines.
Move this logic from platform specific files to rtc driver
as this fixes problems with calculating a century bit.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Helt <krzysztof.h1@wp.pl>
Tested-by: Alexander Beregalov
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Latest mainline gives this section mismatch on sparc:
The function current_pc() references
the variable __init no_sun4u_here.
This is often because current_pc lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of no_sun4u_here is wrong.
Since current_pc() is used only in early time, it is correct to
put it in .init section.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The latest mainline gives this section mismatch on sparc:
The function __devinit apc_probe() references
a variable __initdata apc_no_idle.
If apc_no_idle is only used by apc_probe then
annotate apc_no_idle with a matching annotation.
Since the commit 7e7e2f0356,
apc_probe() is on __devinit so we have to correct apc_no_idle
which is referenced by this function.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
arch/sparc/kernel/sun4d_smp.c: In function ‘smp4d_callin’:
arch/sparc/kernel/sun4d_smp.c:101: error: implicit declaration of function ‘notify_cpu_starting’
arch/sparc/kernel/sun4m_smp.c: In function ‘smp4m_callin’:
arch/sparc/kernel/sun4m_smp.c:74: error: implicit declaration of function ‘notify_cpu_starting’
Signed-off-by: Robert Reif <reif@earthlink.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
I have no SPARC compiler handy to verify, but it looks like this
is another file that doesn't need <linux/miscdevices.h> ...
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Since the first argument is always NULL, the only side effect
is to disable the PROFILE_IRQ, so just do that directly.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This is the only use of the clear_profile_irq() btfixup entry,
which just eats up lots of dead space on other platform types.
A subsequent commit will delete the other implementations and
the btfixup entry as well.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
As noticed by Russell King, we were not setting this properly
to the number of entries, but rather the total size.
This results in the core dumping code allocating waayyyy too
much memory.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
As noticed by Russell King, we were not setting this properly
to the number of entries, but rather the total size.
This results in the core dumping code allocating waayyyy too
much memory.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
