commit ceeab92971 upstream.
The comments in the code indicate that file_info should be released if the
function fails. This releasing is done at the label out_free, not out.
The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
// <smpl>
@r exists@
local idexpression x;
statement S;
expression E;
identifier f,f1,l;
position p1,p2;
expression *ptr != NULL;
@@
x@p1 = kmem_cache_zalloc(...);
...
if (x == NULL) S
<... when != x
when != if (...) { <+...x...+> }
(
x->f1 = E
|
(x->f1 == NULL || ...)
|
f(...,x->f1,...)
)
...>
(
return <+...x...+>;
|
return@p2 ...;
)
@script:python@
p1 << r.p1;
p2 << r.p2;
@@
print "* file: %s kmem_cache_zalloc %s" % (p1[0].file,p1[0].line)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
commit 31f73bee3e upstream.
In ecryptfs_lookup_and_interpose_lower() the lower mount is not decremented
if allocation of a dentry info struct failed. As a result the lower filesystem
cant be unmounted any more (since it is considered busy). This patch corrects
the reference counting.
Signed-off-by: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
commit c43f7b8fb0 upstream.
Lower filesystems that only implemented unlocked_ioctl weren't being
passed ioctl calls because eCryptfs only checked for
lower_file->f_op->ioctl and returned -ENOTTY if it was NULL.
eCryptfs shouldn't implement ioctl(), since it doesn't require the BKL.
This patch introduces ecryptfs_unlocked_ioctl() and
ecryptfs_compat_ioctl(), which passes the calls on to the lower file
system.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ecryptfs/+bug/469664
Reported-by: James Dupin <james.dupin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
commit a6f80fb7b5 upstream.
The function ecryptfs_uid_hash wrongly assumes that the
second parameter to hash_long() is the number of hash
buckets instead of the number of hash bits.
This patch fixes that and renames the variable
ecryptfs_hash_buckets to ecryptfs_hash_bits to make it
clearer.
Fixes: CVE-2010-2492
Signed-off-by: Andre Osterhues <aosterhues@escrypt.com>
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
commit cfce08c6bd upstream.
If the lower file system driver has extended attributes disabled,
ecryptfs' own access functions return -ENOSYS instead of -EOPNOTSUPP.
This breaks execution of programs in the ecryptfs mount, since the
kernel expects the latter error when checking for security
capabilities in xattrs.
Signed-off-by: Christian Pulvermacher <pulvermacher@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
commit 3a60a1686f upstream.
Create a getattr handler for eCryptfs symlinks that is capable of
reading the lower target and decrypting its path. Prior to this patch,
a stat's st_size field would represent the strlen of the encrypted path,
while readlink() would return the strlen of the decrypted path. This
could lead to confusion in some userspace applications, since the two
values should be equal.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524919
Reported-by: Loïc Minier <loic.minier@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
commit 133b8f9d63 upstream.
Since tmpfs has no persistent storage, it pins all its dentries in memory
so they have d_count=1 when other file systems would have d_count=0.
->lookup is only used to create new dentries. If the caller doesn't
instantiate it, it's freed immediately at dput(). ->readdir reads
directly from the dcache and depends on the dentries being hashed.
When an ecryptfs mount is mounted, it associates the lower file and dentry
with the ecryptfs files as they're accessed. When it's umounted and
destroys all the in-memory ecryptfs inodes, it fput's the lower_files and
d_drop's the lower_dentries. Commit 4981e081 added this and a d_delete in
2008 and several months later commit caeeeecf removed the d_delete. I
believe the d_drop() needs to be removed as well.
The d_drop effectively hides any file that has been accessed via ecryptfs
from the underlying tmpfs since it depends on it being hashed for it to
be accessible. I've removed the d_drop on my development node and see no
ill effects with basic testing on both tmpfs and persistent storage.
As a side effect, after ecryptfs d_drops the dentries on tmpfs, tmpfs
BUGs on umount. This is due to the dentries being unhashed.
tmpfs->kill_sb is kill_litter_super which calls d_genocide to drop
the reference pinning the dentry. It skips unhashed and negative dentries,
but shrink_dcache_for_umount_subtree doesn't. Since those dentries
still have an elevated d_count, we get a BUG().
This patch removes the d_drop call and fixes both issues.
This issue was reported at:
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567887
Reported-by: Árpád Bíró <biroa@demasz.hu>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Cc: Dustin Kirkland <kirkland@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
commit f8f484d1b6 upstream.
The i_blocks field of an eCryptfs inode cannot be trusted, but
generic_fillattr() uses it to instantiate the blocks field of a stat()
syscall when a filesystem doesn't implement its own getattr(). Users
have noticed that the output of du is incorrect on newly created files.
This patch creates ecryptfs_getattr() which calls into the lower
filesystem's getattr() so that eCryptfs can use its kstat.blocks value
after calling generic_fillattr(). It is important to note that the
block count includes the eCryptfs metadata stored in the beginning of
the lower file plus any padding used to fill an extent before
encryption.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ecryptfs/+bug/390833
Reported-by: Dominic Sacré <dominic.sacre@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Tim Gardner <timg@tpi.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
commit e27759d7a3 upstream.
Ecryptfs_open dereferences a pointer to the private lower file (the one
stored in the ecryptfs inode), without checking if the pointer is NULL.
Right afterward, it initializes that pointer if it is NULL. Swap order of
statements to first initialize. Bug discovered by Duckjin Kang.
Signed-off-by: Duckjin Kang <fromdj2k@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <ezk@cs.sunysb.edu>
Cc: Dustin Kirkland <kirkland@canonical.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
commit ece550f51b upstream.
The "full_alg_name" variable is used on a couple error paths, so we
shouldn't free it until the end.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
eCryptfs no longer uses a netlink interface to communicate with
ecryptfsd, so NET is not a valid dependency anymore.
MD5 is required and must be built for eCryptfs to be of any use.
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
When calling vfs_unlink() on the lower dentry, d_delete() turns the
dentry into a negative dentry when the d_count is 1. This eventually
caused a NULL pointer deref when a read() or write() was done and the
negative dentry's d_inode was dereferenced in
ecryptfs_read_update_atime() or ecryptfs_getxattr().
Placing mutt's tmpdir in an eCryptfs mount is what initially triggered
the oops and I was able to reproduce it with the following sequence:
open("/tmp/upper/foo", O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_EXCL|O_NOFOLLOW, 0600) = 3
link("/tmp/upper/foo", "/tmp/upper/bar") = 0
unlink("/tmp/upper/foo") = 0
open("/tmp/upper/bar", O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_NOFOLLOW, 0600) = 4
unlink("/tmp/upper/bar") = 0
write(4, "eCryptfs test\n"..., 14 <unfinished ...>
+++ killed by SIGKILL +++
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ecryptfs/+bug/387073
Reported-by: Loïc Minier <loic.minier@canonical.com>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: ecryptfs-devel@lists.launchpad.net
Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Errors returned from vfs_read() and vfs_write() calls to the lower
filesystem were being masked as -EINVAL. This caused some confusion to
users who saw EINVAL instead of ENOSPC when the disk was full, for
instance.
Also, the actual bytes read or written were not accessible by callers to
ecryptfs_read_lower() and ecryptfs_write_lower(), which may be useful in
some cases. This patch updates the error handling logic where those
functions are called in order to accept positive return codes indicating
success.
Cc: Eric Sandeen <esandeen@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: ecryptfs-devel@lists.launchpad.net
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
When searching through the global authentication tokens for a given key
signature, verify that a matching key has not been revoked and has not
expired. This allows the `keyctl revoke` command to be properly used on
keys in use by eCryptfs.
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: ecryptfs-devel@lists.launchpad.net
Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Returns -ENOTSUPP when attempting to use filename encryption with
something other than a password authentication token, such as a private
token from openssl. Using filename encryption with a userspace eCryptfs
key module is a future goal. Until then, this patch handles the
situation a little better than simply using a BUG_ON().
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: ecryptfs-devel@lists.launchpad.net
Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
If the lower inode is read-only, don't attempt to open the lower file
read/write and don't hand off the open request to the privileged
eCryptfs kthread for opening it read/write. Instead, only try an
unprivileged, read-only open of the file and give up if that fails.
This patch fixes an oops when eCryptfs is mounted on top of a read-only
mount.
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <esandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: ecryptfs-devel@lists.launchpad.net
Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Returns an error when an unrecognized cipher code is present in a tag 3
packet or an ecryptfs_crypt_stat cannot be initialized. Also sets an
crypt_stat->tfm error pointer to NULL to ensure that it will not be
incorrectly freed in ecryptfs_destroy_crypt_stat().
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: ecryptfs-devel@lists.launchpad.net
Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
So, I compiled a 2.6.31-rc5 kernel with ecryptfs and loaded its module.
When it came time to mount my filesystem, I got this in dmesg, and it
refused to mount:
[93577.776637] Unable to allocate crypto cipher with name [aes]; rc = [-2]
[93577.783280] Error attempting to initialize key TFM cipher with name = [aes]; rc = [-2]
[93577.791183] Error attempting to initialize cipher with name = [aes] and key size = [32]; rc = [-2]
[93577.800113] Error parsing options; rc = [-22]
I figured from the error message that I'd either forgotten to load "aes"
or that my key size was bogus. Neither one of those was the case. In
fact, I was missing the CRYPTO_ECB config option and the 'ecb' module.
Unfortunately, there's no trace of 'ecb' in that error message.
I've done two things to fix this. First, I've modified ecryptfs's
Kconfig entry to select CRYPTO_ECB and CRYPTO_CBC. I also took CRYPTO
out of the dependencies since the 'select' will take care of it for us.
I've also modified the error messages to print a string that should
contain both 'ecb' and 'aes' in my error case. That will give any
future users a chance of finding the right modules and Kconfig options.
I also wonder if we should:
select CRYPTO_AES if !EMBEDDED
since I think most ecryptfs users are using AES like me.
Cc: ecryptfs-devel@lists.launchpad.net
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dustin Kirkland <kirkland@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com: Removed extra newline, 80-char violation]
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Lockdep reports the following valid-looking possible AB-BA deadlock with
global_auth_tok_list_mutex and keysig_list_mutex:
ecryptfs_new_file_context() ->
ecryptfs_copy_mount_wide_sigs_to_inode_sigs() ->
mutex_lock(&mount_crypt_stat->global_auth_tok_list_mutex);
-> ecryptfs_add_keysig() ->
mutex_lock(&crypt_stat->keysig_list_mutex);
vs
ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set() ->
mutex_lock(&crypt_stat->keysig_list_mutex);
-> ecryptfs_find_global_auth_tok_for_sig() ->
mutex_lock(&mount_crypt_stat->global_auth_tok_list_mutex);
ie the two mutexes are taken in opposite orders in the two different
code paths. I'm not sure if this is a real bug where two threads could
actually hit the two paths in parallel and deadlock, but it at least
makes lockdep impossible to use with ecryptfs since this report triggers
every time and disables future lockdep reporting.
Since ecryptfs_add_keysig() is called only from the single callsite in
ecryptfs_copy_mount_wide_sigs_to_inode_sigs(), the simplest fix seems to
be to move the lock of keysig_list_mutex back up outside of the where
global_auth_tok_list_mutex is taken. This patch does that, and fixes
the lockdep report on my system (and ecryptfs still works OK).
The full output of lockdep fixed by this patch is:
=======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.31-2-generic #14~rbd2
-------------------------------------------------------
gdm/2640 is trying to acquire lock:
(&mount_crypt_stat->global_auth_tok_list_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8121591e>] ecryptfs_find_global_auth_tok_for_sig+0x2e/0x90
but task is already holding lock:
(&crypt_stat->keysig_list_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81217728>] ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x58/0x2b0
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&crypt_stat->keysig_list_mutex){+.+.+.}:
[<ffffffff8108c897>] check_prev_add+0x2a7/0x370
[<ffffffff8108cfc1>] validate_chain+0x661/0x750
[<ffffffff8108d2e7>] __lock_acquire+0x237/0x430
[<ffffffff8108d585>] lock_acquire+0xa5/0x150
[<ffffffff815526cd>] __mutex_lock_common+0x4d/0x3d0
[<ffffffff81552b56>] mutex_lock_nested+0x46/0x60
[<ffffffff8121526a>] ecryptfs_add_keysig+0x5a/0xb0
[<ffffffff81213299>] ecryptfs_copy_mount_wide_sigs_to_inode_sigs+0x59/0xb0
[<ffffffff81214b06>] ecryptfs_new_file_context+0xa6/0x1a0
[<ffffffff8120e42a>] ecryptfs_initialize_file+0x4a/0x140
[<ffffffff8120e54d>] ecryptfs_create+0x2d/0x60
[<ffffffff8113a7d4>] vfs_create+0xb4/0xe0
[<ffffffff8113a8c4>] __open_namei_create+0xc4/0x110
[<ffffffff8113d1c1>] do_filp_open+0xa01/0xae0
[<ffffffff8112d8d9>] do_sys_open+0x69/0x140
[<ffffffff8112d9f0>] sys_open+0x20/0x30
[<ffffffff81013132>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
-> #0 (&mount_crypt_stat->global_auth_tok_list_mutex){+.+.+.}:
[<ffffffff8108c675>] check_prev_add+0x85/0x370
[<ffffffff8108cfc1>] validate_chain+0x661/0x750
[<ffffffff8108d2e7>] __lock_acquire+0x237/0x430
[<ffffffff8108d585>] lock_acquire+0xa5/0x150
[<ffffffff815526cd>] __mutex_lock_common+0x4d/0x3d0
[<ffffffff81552b56>] mutex_lock_nested+0x46/0x60
[<ffffffff8121591e>] ecryptfs_find_global_auth_tok_for_sig+0x2e/0x90
[<ffffffff812177d5>] ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x105/0x2b0
[<ffffffff81212f49>] ecryptfs_write_headers_virt+0xc9/0x120
[<ffffffff8121306d>] ecryptfs_write_metadata+0xcd/0x200
[<ffffffff8120e44b>] ecryptfs_initialize_file+0x6b/0x140
[<ffffffff8120e54d>] ecryptfs_create+0x2d/0x60
[<ffffffff8113a7d4>] vfs_create+0xb4/0xe0
[<ffffffff8113a8c4>] __open_namei_create+0xc4/0x110
[<ffffffff8113d1c1>] do_filp_open+0xa01/0xae0
[<ffffffff8112d8d9>] do_sys_open+0x69/0x140
[<ffffffff8112d9f0>] sys_open+0x20/0x30
[<ffffffff81013132>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
other info that might help us debug this:
2 locks held by gdm/2640:
#0: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#11){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8113cb8b>] do_filp_open+0x3cb/0xae0
#1: (&crypt_stat->keysig_list_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81217728>] ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x58/0x2b0
stack backtrace:
Pid: 2640, comm: gdm Tainted: G C 2.6.31-2-generic #14~rbd2
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8108b988>] print_circular_bug_tail+0xa8/0xf0
[<ffffffff8108c675>] check_prev_add+0x85/0x370
[<ffffffff81094912>] ? __module_text_address+0x12/0x60
[<ffffffff8108cfc1>] validate_chain+0x661/0x750
[<ffffffff81017275>] ? print_context_stack+0x85/0x140
[<ffffffff81089c68>] ? find_usage_backwards+0x38/0x160
[<ffffffff8108d2e7>] __lock_acquire+0x237/0x430
[<ffffffff8108d585>] lock_acquire+0xa5/0x150
[<ffffffff8121591e>] ? ecryptfs_find_global_auth_tok_for_sig+0x2e/0x90
[<ffffffff8108b0b0>] ? check_usage_backwards+0x0/0xb0
[<ffffffff815526cd>] __mutex_lock_common+0x4d/0x3d0
[<ffffffff8121591e>] ? ecryptfs_find_global_auth_tok_for_sig+0x2e/0x90
[<ffffffff8121591e>] ? ecryptfs_find_global_auth_tok_for_sig+0x2e/0x90
[<ffffffff8108c02c>] ? mark_held_locks+0x6c/0xa0
[<ffffffff81125b0d>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0xfd/0x1a0
[<ffffffff8108c34d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x14d/0x190
[<ffffffff81552b56>] mutex_lock_nested+0x46/0x60
[<ffffffff8121591e>] ecryptfs_find_global_auth_tok_for_sig+0x2e/0x90
[<ffffffff812177d5>] ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x105/0x2b0
[<ffffffff81212f49>] ecryptfs_write_headers_virt+0xc9/0x120
[<ffffffff8121306d>] ecryptfs_write_metadata+0xcd/0x200
[<ffffffff81210240>] ? ecryptfs_init_persistent_file+0x60/0xe0
[<ffffffff8120e44b>] ecryptfs_initialize_file+0x6b/0x140
[<ffffffff8120e54d>] ecryptfs_create+0x2d/0x60
[<ffffffff8113a7d4>] vfs_create+0xb4/0xe0
[<ffffffff8113a8c4>] __open_namei_create+0xc4/0x110
[<ffffffff8113d1c1>] do_filp_open+0xa01/0xae0
[<ffffffff8129a93e>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x5e/0xb0
[<ffffffff8155410b>] ? _spin_unlock+0x2b/0x40
[<ffffffff81139e9b>] ? getname+0x3b/0x240
[<ffffffff81148a5a>] ? alloc_fd+0xfa/0x140
[<ffffffff8112d8d9>] do_sys_open+0x69/0x140
[<ffffffff81553b8f>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
[<ffffffff8112d9f0>] sys_open+0x20/0x30
[<ffffffff81013132>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
In ecryptfs_destroy_inode(), inode_info->lower_file_mutex is locked,
and just after the mutex is unlocked, the code does:
kmem_cache_free(ecryptfs_inode_info_cache, inode_info);
This means that if another context could possibly try to take the same
mutex as ecryptfs_destroy_inode(), then it could end up getting the
mutex just before the data structure containing the mutex is freed.
So any such use would be an obvious use-after-free bug (catchable with
slab poisoning or mutex debugging), and therefore the locking in
ecryptfs_destroy_inode() is not needed and can be dropped.
Similarly, in ecryptfs_destroy_crypt_stat(), crypt_stat->keysig_list_mutex
is locked, and then the mutex is unlocked just before the code does:
memset(crypt_stat, 0, sizeof(struct ecryptfs_crypt_stat));
Therefore taking this mutex is similarly not necessary.
Removing this locking fixes false-positive lockdep reports such as the
following (and they are false-positives for exactly the same reason
that the locking is not needed):
=================================
[ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
2.6.31-2-generic #14~rbd3
---------------------------------
inconsistent {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} -> {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} usage.
kswapd0/323 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
(&inode_info->lower_file_mutex){+.+.?.}, at: [<ffffffff81210d34>] ecryptfs_destroy_inode+0x34/0x100
{RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} state was registered at:
[<ffffffff8108c02c>] mark_held_locks+0x6c/0xa0
[<ffffffff8108c10f>] lockdep_trace_alloc+0xaf/0xe0
[<ffffffff81125a51>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x41/0x1a0
[<ffffffff8113117a>] get_empty_filp+0x7a/0x1a0
[<ffffffff8112dd46>] dentry_open+0x36/0xc0
[<ffffffff8121a36c>] ecryptfs_privileged_open+0x5c/0x2e0
[<ffffffff81210283>] ecryptfs_init_persistent_file+0xa3/0xe0
[<ffffffff8120e838>] ecryptfs_lookup_and_interpose_lower+0x278/0x380
[<ffffffff8120f97a>] ecryptfs_lookup+0x12a/0x250
[<ffffffff8113930a>] real_lookup+0xea/0x160
[<ffffffff8113afc8>] do_lookup+0xb8/0xf0
[<ffffffff8113b518>] __link_path_walk+0x518/0x870
[<ffffffff8113bd9c>] path_walk+0x5c/0xc0
[<ffffffff8113be5b>] do_path_lookup+0x5b/0xa0
[<ffffffff8113bfe7>] user_path_at+0x57/0xa0
[<ffffffff811340dc>] vfs_fstatat+0x3c/0x80
[<ffffffff8113424b>] vfs_stat+0x1b/0x20
[<ffffffff81134274>] sys_newstat+0x24/0x50
[<ffffffff81013132>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
irq event stamp: 7811
hardirqs last enabled at (7811): [<ffffffff810c037f>] call_rcu+0x5f/0x90
hardirqs last disabled at (7810): [<ffffffff810c0353>] call_rcu+0x33/0x90
softirqs last enabled at (3764): [<ffffffff810631da>] __do_softirq+0x14a/0x220
softirqs last disabled at (3751): [<ffffffff8101440c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
other info that might help us debug this:
2 locks held by kswapd0/323:
#0: (shrinker_rwsem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff810f67ed>] shrink_slab+0x3d/0x190
#1: (&type->s_umount_key#35){.+.+..}, at: [<ffffffff811429a1>] prune_dcache+0xd1/0x1b0
stack backtrace:
Pid: 323, comm: kswapd0 Tainted: G C 2.6.31-2-generic #14~rbd3
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8108ad6c>] print_usage_bug+0x18c/0x1a0
[<ffffffff8108aff0>] ? check_usage_forwards+0x0/0xc0
[<ffffffff8108bac2>] mark_lock_irq+0xf2/0x280
[<ffffffff8108bd87>] mark_lock+0x137/0x1d0
[<ffffffff81164710>] ? fsnotify_clear_marks_by_inode+0x30/0xf0
[<ffffffff8108bee6>] mark_irqflags+0xc6/0x1a0
[<ffffffff8108d337>] __lock_acquire+0x287/0x430
[<ffffffff8108d585>] lock_acquire+0xa5/0x150
[<ffffffff81210d34>] ? ecryptfs_destroy_inode+0x34/0x100
[<ffffffff8108d2e7>] ? __lock_acquire+0x237/0x430
[<ffffffff815526ad>] __mutex_lock_common+0x4d/0x3d0
[<ffffffff81210d34>] ? ecryptfs_destroy_inode+0x34/0x100
[<ffffffff81164710>] ? fsnotify_clear_marks_by_inode+0x30/0xf0
[<ffffffff81210d34>] ? ecryptfs_destroy_inode+0x34/0x100
[<ffffffff8129a91e>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x5e/0xb0
[<ffffffff81552b36>] mutex_lock_nested+0x46/0x60
[<ffffffff81210d34>] ecryptfs_destroy_inode+0x34/0x100
[<ffffffff81145d27>] destroy_inode+0x87/0xd0
[<ffffffff81146b4c>] generic_delete_inode+0x12c/0x1a0
[<ffffffff81145832>] iput+0x62/0x70
[<ffffffff811423c8>] dentry_iput+0x98/0x110
[<ffffffff81142550>] d_kill+0x50/0x80
[<ffffffff81142623>] prune_one_dentry+0xa3/0xc0
[<ffffffff811428b1>] __shrink_dcache_sb+0x271/0x290
[<ffffffff811429d9>] prune_dcache+0x109/0x1b0
[<ffffffff81142abf>] shrink_dcache_memory+0x3f/0x50
[<ffffffff810f68dd>] shrink_slab+0x12d/0x190
[<ffffffff810f9377>] balance_pgdat+0x4d7/0x640
[<ffffffff8104c4c0>] ? finish_task_switch+0x40/0x150
[<ffffffff810f63c0>] ? isolate_pages_global+0x0/0x60
[<ffffffff810f95f7>] kswapd+0x117/0x170
[<ffffffff810777a0>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40
[<ffffffff810f94e0>] ? kswapd+0x0/0x170
[<ffffffff810773be>] kthread+0x9e/0xb0
[<ffffffff8101430a>] child_rip+0xa/0x20
[<ffffffff81013c90>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
[<ffffffff81077320>] ? kthread+0x0/0xb0
[<ffffffff81014300>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier <roland@digitalvampire.org>
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
The parse_tag_3_packet function does not check if the tag 3 packet contains a
encrypted key size larger than ECRYPTFS_MAX_ENCRYPTED_KEY_BYTES.
Signed-off-by: Ramon de Carvalho Valle <ramon@risesecurity.org>
[tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com: Added printk newline and changed goto to out_free]
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org (2.6.27 and 30)
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Tag 11 packets are stored in the metadata section of an eCryptfs file to
store the key signature(s) used to encrypt the file encryption key.
After extracting the packet length field to determine the key signature
length, a check is not performed to see if the length would exceed the
key signature buffer size that was passed into parse_tag_11_packet().
Thanks to Ramon de Carvalho Valle for finding this bug using fsfuzzer.
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org (2.6.27 and 30)
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
