There's no need for another variable local to this loop; we can use the
variable (of the same name!) already declared at the top of the function,
and not used till later (at which point it's initialized, so this is safe).
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
The first argument to posix_locks_conflict() is meant to be a lock request,
and the second a lock from an inode's lock request. It doesn't really
make a difference which order you call them in, since the only
asymmetric test in posix_lock_conflict() is the check whether the second
argument is a posix lock--and every caller already does that check for
some reason.
But may as well fix posix_test_lock() to call posix_locks_conflict()
with the arguments in the same order as everywhere else.
Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
The inode->i_flock list contains the leases, flocks and posix
locks in the specified order. However, the flocks are added in
the head of this list thus hiding the leases from F_GETLEASE
command, from time_out_leases() and other code that expects
the leases to come first.
The following example will demonstrate this:
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <unistd.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/file.h>
static void show_lease(int fd)
{
int res;
res = fcntl(fd, F_GETLEASE);
switch (res) {
case F_RDLCK:
printf("Read lease\n");
break;
case F_WRLCK:
printf("Write lease\n");
break;
case F_UNLCK:
printf("No leases\n");
break;
default:
printf("Some shit\n");
break;
}
}
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
int fd, res;
fd = open(argv[1], O_RDONLY);
if (fd == -1) {
perror("Can't open file");
return 1;
}
res = fcntl(fd, F_SETLEASE, F_WRLCK);
if (res == -1) {
perror("Can't set lease");
return 1;
}
show_lease(fd);
if (flock(fd, LOCK_SH) == -1) {
perror("Can't flock shared");
return 1;
}
show_lease(fd);
return 0;
}
The first call to show_lease() will show the write lease set, but
the second will show no leases.
Fix the flock adding so that the leases always stay in the head
of this list.
Found during making the flocks pid-namespaces aware.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Acked-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Slab destructors were no longer supported after Christoph's
c59def9f22 change. They've been
BUGs for both slab and slub, and slob never supported them
either.
This rips out support for the dtor pointer from kmem_cache_create()
completely and fixes up every single callsite in the kernel (there were
about 224, not including the slab allocator definitions themselves,
or the documentation references).
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Thanks to Doug Chapman for pointing out that the comment here is
inconsistent with the function prototype.
Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Since posix_test_lock(), like fcntl() and ->lock(), indicates absence or
presence of a conflict lock by setting fl_type to, respectively, F_UNLCK
or something other than F_UNLCK, the return value is no longer needed.
Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Currently leases are only kept locally, so there's no way for a distributed
filesystem to enforce them against multiple clients. We're particularly
interested in the case of nfsd exporting a cluster filesystem, in which
case nfsd needs cluster-coherent leases in order to implement delegations
correctly.
Also add some documentation.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
We've been using the convention that vfs_foo is the function that calls
a filesystem-specific foo method if it exists, or falls back on a
generic method if it doesn't; thus vfs_foo is what is called when some
other part of the kernel (normally lockd or nfsd) wants to get a lock,
whereas foo is what filesystems call to use the underlying local
functionality as part of their lock implementation.
So rename setlease to vfs_setlease (which will call a
filesystem-specific setlease after a later patch) and __setlease to
setlease.
Also, vfs_setlease need only be GPL-exported as long as it's only needed
by lockd and nfsd.
Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Share more code between setlease (used by nfsd) and fcntl.
Also some minor cleanup.
Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Return the newly allocated structure as the return value instead of
using a struct ** parameter.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
There's no point trying to return an error in these cases, which all represent
bugs in the callers.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
clarify that break_lease() checks for presence of any lock, not just leases.
Signed-off-by: David M. Richter <richterd@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
In 9d6a8c5c21 we changed posix_test_lock
to modify its single file_lock argument instead of taking separate input
and output arguments. This makes it no longer safe to set the output
lock's fl_type to F_UNLCK before looking for a conflict, since that
means searching for a conflict against a lock with type F_UNLCK.
This fixes a regression which causes F_GETLK to incorrectly report no
conflict on most filesystems (including any filesystem that doesn't do
its own locking).
Also fix posix_lock_to_flock() to copy the lock type. This isn't
strictly necessary, since the caller already does this; but it seems
less likely to cause confusion in the future.
Thanks to Doug Chapman for the bug report.
Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Acked-by: Doug Chapman <doug.chapman@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* 'server-cluster-locking-api' of git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux:
gfs2: nfs lock support for gfs2
lockd: add code to handle deferred lock requests
lockd: always preallocate block in nlmsvc_lock()
lockd: handle test_lock deferrals
lockd: pass cookie in nlmsvc_testlock
lockd: handle fl_grant callbacks
lockd: save lock state on deferral
locks: add fl_grant callback for asynchronous lock return
nfsd4: Convert NFSv4 to new lock interface
locks: add lock cancel command
locks: allow {vfs,posix}_lock_file to return conflicting lock
locks: factor out generic/filesystem switch from setlock code
locks: factor out generic/filesystem switch from test_lock
locks: give posix_test_lock same interface as ->lock
locks: make ->lock release private data before returning in GETLK case
locks: create posix-to-flock helper functions
locks: trivial removal of unnecessary parentheses
I have never seen a use of SLAB_DEBUG_INITIAL. It is only supported by
SLAB.
I think its purpose was to have a callback after an object has been freed
to verify that the state is the constructor state again? The callback is
performed before each freeing of an object.
I would think that it is much easier to check the object state manually
before the free. That also places the check near the code object
manipulation of the object.
Also the SLAB_DEBUG_INITIAL callback is only performed if the kernel was
compiled with SLAB debugging on. If there would be code in a constructor
handling SLAB_DEBUG_INITIAL then it would have to be conditional on
SLAB_DEBUG otherwise it would just be dead code. But there is no such code
in the kernel. I think SLUB_DEBUG_INITIAL is too problematic to make real
use of, difficult to understand and there are easier ways to accomplish the
same effect (i.e. add debug code before kfree).
There is a related flag SLAB_CTOR_VERIFY that is frequently checked to be
clear in fs inode caches. Remove the pointless checks (they would even be
pointless without removeal of SLAB_DEBUG_INITIAL) from the fs constructors.
This is the last slab flag that SLUB did not support. Remove the check for
unimplemented flags from SLUB.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Acquiring a lock on a cluster filesystem may require communication with
remote hosts, and to avoid blocking lockd or nfsd threads during such
communication, we allow the results to be returned asynchronously.
When a ->lock() call needs to block, the file system will return
-EINPROGRESS, and then later return the results with a call to the
routine in the fl_grant field of the lock_manager_operations struct.
This differs from the case when ->lock returns -EAGAIN to a blocking
lock request; in that case, the filesystem calls fl_notify when the lock
is granted, and the caller retries the original lock. So while
fl_notify is merely a hint to the caller that it should retry, fl_grant
actually communicates the final result of the lock operation (with the
lock already acquired in the succesful case).
Therefore fl_grant takes a lock, a status and, for the test lock case, a
conflicting lock. We also allow fl_grant to return an error to the
filesystem, to handle the case where the fl_grant requests arrives after
the lock manager has already given up waiting for it.
Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Lock managers need to be able to cancel pending lock requests. In the case
where the exported filesystem manages its own locks, it's not sufficient just
to call posix_unblock_lock(); we need to let the filesystem know what's
happening too.
We do this by adding a new fcntl lock command: FL_CANCELLK. Some day this
might also be made available to userspace applications that could benefit from
an asynchronous locking api.
Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
The nfsv4 protocol's lock operation, in the case of a conflict, returns
information about the conflicting lock.
It's unclear how clients can use this, so for now we're not going so far as to
add a filesystem method that can return a conflicting lock, but we may as well
return something in the local case when it's easy to.
Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Factor out the code that switches between generic and filesystem-specific lock
methods; eventually we want to call this from lock managers (lockd and nfsd)
too; currently they only call the generic methods.
This patch does that for all the setlk code.
Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Factor out the code that switches between generic and filesystem-specific lock
methods; eventually we want to call this from lock managers (lockd and nfsd)
too; currently they only call the generic methods.
This patch does that for test_lock.
Note that this hasn't been necessary until recently, because the few
filesystems that define ->lock() (nfs, cifs...) aren't exportable via NFS.
However GFS (and, in the future, other cluster filesystems) need to implement
their own locking to get cluster-coherent locking, and also want to be able to
export locking to NFS (lockd and NFSv4).
So we accomplish this by factoring out code such as this and exporting it for
the use of lockd and nfsd.
Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
posix_test_lock() and ->lock() do the same job but have gratuitously
different interfaces. Modify posix_test_lock() so the two agree,
simplifying some code in the process.
Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
The file_lock argument to ->lock is used to return the conflicting lock
when found. There's no reason for the filesystem to return any private
information with this conflicting lock, but nfsv4 is.
Fix nfsv4 client, and modify locks.c to stop calling fl_release_private
for it in this case.
Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Cc: "Trond Myklebust" <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>"
